OpenText Data Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

The compared OpenText and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #23 in BRS , with an average rating of 7.4, and holds a 0.6% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #4 in DLP , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,552 Views
968 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Read 59 Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews

4,244 Views
2,768 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Data Protector and Symantec Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: May 2019).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

May 2019

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (23rd)

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Data Protector and Symantec Data Loss Prevention aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Data Protector is designed for Backup and Recovery and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, down 0.7% compared to last year.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 7.2% mindshare, down 11.7% since last year.

Backup and Recovery

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

ARAVINDAN K

Information Security Engineer 4 at Amadeus

Strengthened security operations with endpoint-level protection but database flexibility could improve

Symantec Data Loss Prevention has proprietary metadata and is well-suited for endpoint-level security. It stands out for supporting multiple protocols like email and SMTP without needing user profile login for endpoint agents. Once policies are downloaded to the local system, they function independently of a user's login. The solution helps enhance security operations when integrated with ServiceNow and offers robust incident response capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."

"Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

"The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange."

"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"The solution offers great reporting."

"Good end point encryption and data loss prevention."

"I found Symantec to be user-friendly and easy to use."

"The product is very robust."

"The incident response options and reporting features are particularly strong, with the inclusion of Incident Classification Assessment (ICA) for integrated reporting."

"The incident response capability has been instrumental in mitigating potential data loss."

"The tool's really working well, and the agents are good."

"Technical support is very professional and responsive."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."

"This solution is not scalable."

"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"The technical support is poor and should be improved."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"The product must improve its interface."

"Symantec could be better with infrastructure."

"There is room for improvement in the remote control capabilities of the DLP solution."

"Different departments should manage administration, reporting, normalization and incident management."

"The product must provide data encryption."

"In my opinion, Symantec DLP could improve by offering a better online service option, making it more competitive compared to Forcepoint. Performance could also be enhanced, especially in terms of prevention capabilities. Additionally, it would be beneficial to add features that allow for better policy integration with GDPR, such as international credit, bank account, or identity management. This would make it more straightforward for IT, especially in regions like Indonesia."

"The enforce service is difficult to understand, and free courses made available on the internet would be useful."

"A significant area for improvement in the product is reducing the number of agents required and improving integration as a unified client ecosystem."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"The price of Symantec DLP is fair. I don't recall the cost of the license, but it wasn't outrageous enough that it was an obstacle to approval. I'm not concerned with how much per seat or server, but I know they charge a lot."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"From what I know the pricing is good, it's not too expensive. If you negotiate you can get a good price."

"The product is high-priced."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."

"The price is a bit high."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

Pricing is high compared to other solutions. If they offer suitable features and a compatible price, we can attract clients. If the tech support becomes good, the price becomes less of a concern. W...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector. This has been an issue, especially when troubleshooting or integrating with other vendor-spe...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

I do not have an idea about pricing, as it is handled by another team responsible for procurements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle, especially compared to other products like Forcepoint, which offer MSSQL database options that are more convenient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 70% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 38% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 19% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

March 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

March 2025

Download Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Symantec DLP

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

May 2019

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.