Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP comparison

Broadcom and Trellix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Trellix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 4.2% mindshare in DLP, compared to Trellix’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Trellix DLP compete in the data protection and security category. Symantec appears to have the upper hand with its advanced machine learning capabilities and comprehensive feature set, making it a stronger choice for complex and sensitive data environments.

Features: Symantec DLP offers comprehensive monitoring and protection of sensitive data on computers, advanced machine learning capabilities for document classification, and supports various encryption methods, now extended to tablets. Trellix DLP provides robust endpoint security, integrated data encryption, and a unified console for managing multiple security aspects, although it falls short in advanced document classification.

Room for Improvement: Symantec DLP struggles with implementation complexity, reliance on Oracle databases, and the need for improved false positive reduction. Trellix DLP could improve by supporting a broader range of operating systems, specifically Linux and Mac, and enhancing browser compatibility. User interface enhancements would benefit both solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec DLP requires careful on-premises deployment planning and has mixed feedback on post-acquisition customer service responsiveness. Trellix DLP offers simpler deployment but could improve initial setup processes and support response times.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec DLP's Oracle database dependence can be cost-prohibitive for smaller businesses, though larger entities find it competitive. The ROI is promising through reduced incident management costs. Trellix DLP offers a straightforward yearly license model, perceived as reasonable, providing measurable ROI through data protection and reduced incidents.

To learn more, read our detailed Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is 4.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix DLP is 3.1%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Data Loss Prevention	4.2%
Trellix DLP	3.1%
Cloudflare One	1.7%
Other	91.0%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

OZGURTOSUN

Technical Team Leader at Redington (India) Ltd

Experienced implementation enhances security with robust detection and centralized management

A significant case highlighted an improvement need when a banking company lost 500 customer information pieces through screenshots. The data theft occurred through individual screenshots of credit note pages rather than taking complete PDF files. This incident led to the suggestion for implementing image detection methods, as Data Loss Prevention solutions needed to analyze image details. Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images. The pricing structure remains an area for improvement. We lost a POC despite installing 2,000 endpoints because Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to other solutions. Although the competing product couldn't match all the best practices, the price difference influenced the final decision.

Read full review

GANESAN K

Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

Distributors highly benefit from advanced data monitoring and seamless integration features

The Machine Learning capability could be improved, particularly in data discovery. When given sensitive data expressions, the system retrieves files that are not always related. The system should adhere strictly to the given expression rather than just focusing on keywords within the expression. In endpoint features, while the detection rate is good, there could be improvements in remediation and rollback solutions during attacks. Other solutions now include such options since providing 100% security is impossible. The flexibility varies across environments. Enterprise customers find the product performs well without affecting their data, with scans running as scheduled. However, SMB customers experience some performance issues during scanning. Since EDR is integrated, users must access the EDR console to check endpoint detections. It would be beneficial if this functionality were incorporated within the EPO console, as the current threat graphs link doesn't display endpoint threat graphs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudflare Access is a stable solution."

"Cloudflare Access is part of the Zero Trust philosophy."

"This solution is easy to understand and easy to configure."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"I'm very satisfied with the environment and the dashboard."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Technical support is very professional and responsive."

"The data matching features are the most valuable due to the easy policy setup and implementation."

"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."

"I have never experienced any stability issues during the eight years of using the solution."

"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."

"There's only one policy needed to implement for all channels."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is endpoint security."

"The solution can easily scale."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros

"It is a very stable solution."

"Trellix's technical support deserves a perfect rating, and I would rate it ten out of ten compared to other solutions."

"Trellix DLP offers many features, using EDR, EPP, disk encryption, and other features."

"I rate the product an eight out of ten."

"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."

"The support from both the vendor and Trellix is excellent."

"The solution involves implementing the confidentiality, utility, and availability principles."

"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."

More Trellix DLP pros

Cons

"I would like them to include a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."

More Cloudflare One cons

"I would like to see an improved interface, with better documentation and integration with other products."

"The enforce service is difficult to understand, and free courses made available on the internet would be useful."

"I do have a problem with the database."

"Symantec could improve by being more creative and simplifying the functions. Additionally, the data protection should be bundled with data classification and labeling instead of them being separate."

"The installation is more complex than other solutions."

"The one downside for Symantec is that, due to its transition from Symantec to Broadcom, there's been a lot of changes. I am based in the Philippines and we don't have a contact person locally for any Symantec."

"In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company; however, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption."

"A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle, especially compared to other products like Forcepoint, which offer MSSQL database options that are more convenient."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected."

"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."

"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."

"Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies."

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected. The agents often affect endpoint performance negatively and do not behave consistently across all machines."

"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."

"The bugs need improvement."

"The support team's response time during the night is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Trellix DLP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The product charges a little on the higher side."

"The solution should be less expensive to allow more people the opportunity to use it. Some of their competitors are less expensive. There is a license required to use the solution and we purchased an annual license."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"DLP could be a bit cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP works with Oracle Database. Oracle Database licensing is much more expensive than other databases. That might be a drawback for customers. The pricing is on a yearly subscription basis."

"I think it is an expensive tool."

"Support is a little costly, but you get what you pay for."

"I think that it's an expensive product, even as an enterprise-suite product."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"The pricing depends on the number of users in a company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

23%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	28

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

I am not aware of the licensing cost for Symantec Data Loss Prevention because the licensing cost is up to senior man...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

In future updates of Symantec Data Loss Prevention, I would like to see improvements based on the many attacks happen...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trellix?

Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trellix?

The management aspect is that its management is proprietary. You cannot integrate it with other platforms like a SIEM...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trellix?

First, be clear about the scope of your DLP. Be very clear on the list and your inventory of assets to protect, becau...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 9% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 10% of the time

SkyGuard DLP vs Trellix DLP

Compared 8% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Trellix DLP

Compared 7% of the time

MIND vs Trellix DLP

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix DLP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

March 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

March 2026

Download Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix DLP

March 2026

Download Trellix DLP product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Symantec DLP

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom

Trellix DLP is the ultimate data loss prevention (DLP) solution, safeguarding organizations' sensitive data from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. This robust system monitors and regulates data flows across networks, emails, and the web, identifying and shielding various data types such as financial, personal, intellectual property, and regulated data. Employing encryption, access control, DLP policies, and monitoring, it secures data both at rest and in transit, ensuring compliance with data security regulations and industry standards. With customizable deployment options, including on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid, Trellix DLP offers comprehensive protection and rapid response to data loss incidents.

Trellix

Sample Customers

23andMe

Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP

March 2026

Free Report: Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP

Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.