No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Purview DLP vs Symantec DLP comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 8.0% mindshare in DLP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Cloudflare One
Read 23 Cloudflare One reviews
  • 10,724 Views
  • 965 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview Data Loss...
Read 32 Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reviews
  • 8,052 Views
  • 6,844 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Read 61 Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews
  • 4,069 Views
  • 3,906 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention both compete in the sensitive data protection category. While both offer strong features, Microsoft Purview may have a slight advantage due to seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing overall user experience.

Features: Symantec Data Loss Prevention excels in extensive network DLP solutions, comprehensive machine learning capabilities for document classification, and support for multiple encryption mechanisms. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention stands out with its seamless integration with Microsoft services, automated data classification, and robust policy implementation across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Symantec's installation process is complex, relies heavily on Oracle databases, and has been critiqued for technical support delays. Microsoft Purview can improve by broadening its endpoint functionalities, handling false positives better, and easing user sensitivity label setups. Symantec users desire improved documentation and fewer false positives, while Microsoft users wish for faster incident handling and policy propagation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Data Loss Prevention supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments but deployment is often complex, with varied customer service experiences since Broadcom's acquisition. Microsoft Purview, on the other hand, is easier to deploy, thanks to strong support for public cloud environments and Microsoft's global infrastructure and support.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec offers a comprehensive solution but pricing is considered expensive, primarily due to its dependency on Oracle databases. In contrast, Microsoft Purview is more competitively priced as part of the E5 license, combining compliance and security tools. Both provide ROI through enhanced data security, fitting different budgetary and deployment needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One
Sponsored
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (20th), Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (7th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (13th), Access Management (12th), Bot Management (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (8th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (3rd)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (14th)
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 8.0%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is 4.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention8.0%
Symantec Data Loss Prevention4.2%
Cloudflare One1.7%
Other86.1%
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Q&A Highlights

VK
Venkata Kiran
ISR Service Manager Data Security Services - Cybersecurity at Standard Chartered Bank
Mar 23, 2023
Which solution do you prefer: Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, or Microsoft Purview DLP?
Data loss prevention (DLP) is an important security technology that can help organizations protect their data from unauthorized access, misuse, and data loss. DLP solutions are designed to detect data breaches and alert companies about the possible security risks associated with data storage. They can be used to block data transfers or restrict access to data stored in cloud-based data stores. In addition, DLP solutions can be used to monitor data usage and detect malicious behavior such as data theft or data leakage. By implementing data loss prevention technology, companies can protect their data from external threats and unauthorized access. When it comes to Email Cloud Security, Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, and Microsoft Purview DLP are all strong contenders. But which solution is the right one for you? Well, that depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize ease of use and scalability in your Email Cloud Security solutions, then Symantec DLP is the right choice. If, on the other hand, you value data privacy and protection then Proofpoint DLP is a better option. Finally, Microsoft Purview DLP stands out for its comprehensive analytics tools that give users greater insight into their Email Cloud Security performance. So which Email Cloud Security solution do you pick? Choose wisely! It could make all the difference.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

CV
Cobe Van Coller
Network Architect at IP Dimension
Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites
I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.
Read full review
ClayHampton - PeerSpot reviewer
ClayHampton
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Protects sensitive data across devices and helps address client compliance needs proactively
The reporting in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is a little easier than most Microsoft portals. I understand the licensing cost, especially if you're a Business Premium or in the SMB world, and a lot of clients run with a Business Premium. That comes with data loss prevention in a manual process, whereas E5 gives automation. Microsoft has said, 'Okay, here's your Microsoft 365 E5 compliance add-on that can go on the Business Premium.' So Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic. That was the big point that they were missing, and I'm glad that they actually have an add-on now that makes it possible. So truly, I don't think there's a downside. Maybe more reporting, but that's it.
Read full review
OT
OZGURTOSUN
Technical Team Leader at Redington (India) Ltd
Experienced implementation enhances security with robust detection and centralized management
A significant case highlighted an improvement need when a banking company lost 500 customer information pieces through screenshots. The data theft occurred through individual screenshots of credit note pages rather than taking complete PDF files. This incident led to the suggestion for implementing image detection methods, as Data Loss Prevention solutions needed to analyze image details. Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images. The pricing structure remains an area for improvement. We lost a POC despite installing 2,000 endpoints because Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to other solutions. Although the competing product couldn't match all the best practices, the price difference influenced the final decision.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Enables me to work from two locations."
"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."
"Clover is the best product globally."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."
"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."
"The blocking feature is very good."
"Cloudflare is by far the most effective solution that I have come across."
"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."
More Cloudflare One pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is in the area of OCR."
"It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated."
"Microsoft Purview's classification and policy controls impact users' productivity within my organization very positively, as it does not get in the way of their working."
"Insider risk management and data retention are beneficial."
"I like the sensitivity labels and data security posture management for AI."
"Microsoft Purview has helped improve my company's ability to discover sensitive data, as most companies would say that they improved in the whole posture on this field."
"Microsoft Purview has helped improve our organization's ability to discover sensitive data significantly as we use eDiscovery Purview, which is incredibly helpful."
"The solution is very stable and extremely reliable."
More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros
"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."
"The product helps with blocking sensitive data transmission and permission management."
"The most valuable feature is the end point encryption and the solution provides good data loss prevention."
"The solution is very good at fingerprinting the documents."
"All of the features are really important, including DLP for the OCR and endpoint. It will be all of the combined features that will give you the strength to control the data. Every feature has its own uniqueness, different control and will help you to protect the data."
"It is the best solution I have ever used."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention are endpoint security, endpoint agent, and DLP. Additionally, we have been satisfied with the policies."
"The data matching features are the most valuable due to the easy policy setup and implementation."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros
 

Cons

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."
"Feedback could be enhanced."
"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."
"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."
"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."
"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."
"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."
"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."
More Cloudflare One cons
"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels."
"At this time, I have not seen a return on investment with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention."
"There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful."
"I would say the improvement of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention could be in the propagation of policies, as if you create a policy, it may take up to 48 hours to propagate to devices, and this might take a little bit longer than ideal."
"Improving Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would involve recognizing that the whole AI path we are all on is going to help, given the massive amount of data we handle; even if there are true positives, implementing a degree of severity ranking is essential."
"I rate the overall solution 3 out of 10."
"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."
"The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic."
More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons
"In the object capture recognition, which we implemented recently, there are a lot of false positives that have been happening."
"A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle, especially compared to other products like Forcepoint, which offer MSSQL database options that are more convenient."
"I have actually contacted technology support twice. They never responded."
"The enforce service is difficult to understand, and free courses made available on the internet would be useful."
"This product is very powerful but it is very complex, so making it simpler to use would be an improvement."
"The solution relies on and Oracle database which is not financially feasible for many customers."
"We want a more proactive reporting structure."
"Since being acquired by Broadcom, the support has really degraded for small and medium enterprises. They don't help with anything and just send emails when we ask them to come on call."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."
"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."
"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."
"The solution is not that expensive."
"The prices are slightly expensive."
"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."
"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."
"The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."
"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."
"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."
"It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."
"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."
"The cost works out to about $15 per user per month."
More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice
"The price of Symantec DLP is fair. I don't recall the cost of the license, but it wasn't outrageous enough that it was an obstacle to approval. I'm not concerned with how much per seat or server, but I know they charge a lot."
"Support is a little costly, but you get what you pay for."
"The product is high-priced."
"Pricing is above average."
"The price of Symantec Data Loss Prevention could be reduced."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
"The solution's pricing is based on a license model."
"We are happy with the pricing and licencing."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

VK
Venkata Kiran
ISR Service Manager Data Security Services - Cybersecurity at Standard Chartered Bank
Mar 23, 2023
Mar 23, 2023
Which solution do you prefer: Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, or Microsoft Purview DLP?
Data loss prevention (DLP) is an important security technology that can help organizations protect their data from unauthorized access, misuse, and data loss. DLP solutions are designed to detect data breaches and alert companies about the possible security risks associated with data storage. They can be used to block data transfers or restrict access to data stored in cloud-based data stores. ...
See 2 answers
Muhammad Ejaz ul Hassan - PeerSpot reviewer
Muhammad Ejaz ul Hassan
CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Mar 13, 2023
Go with Symantec DLP. If you have any questions let me know @ Ejaz.hassan@risetechno.com. 
Read full answer
Remy Ma - PeerSpot reviewer
Remy Ma
Network Security Services at ACE Managed Securty Services
Mar 23, 2023
Data loss prevention (DLP) is an important security technology that can help organizations protect their data from unauthorized access, misuse, and data loss. DLP solutions are designed to detect data breaches and alert companies about the possible security risks associated with data storage. They can be used to block data transfers or restrict access to data stored in cloud-based data stores. In addition, DLP solutions can be used to monitor data usage and detect malicious behavior such as data theft or data leakage. By implementing data loss prevention technology, companies can protect their data from external threats and unauthorized access. When it comes to Email Cloud Security, Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, and Microsoft Purview DLP are all strong contenders. But which solution is the right one for you? Well, that depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize ease of use and scalability in your Email Cloud Security solutions, then Symantec DLP is the right choice. If, on the other hand, you value data privacy and protection then Proofpoint DLP is a better option. Finally, Microsoft Purview DLP stands out for its comprehensive analytics tools that give users greater insight into their Email Cloud Security performance. So which Email Cloud Security solution do you pick? Choose wisely! It could make all the difference.
Read full answer
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?
The pricing of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is acceptable for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?
I think that a feature on the side where you could click on something with a question mark, and then if you click on ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?
My main use case is to upload mailboxes. We're using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to upload mailboxes. The ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
I am not aware of the licensing cost for Symantec Data Loss Prevention because the licensing cost is up to senior man...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
In future updates of Symantec Data Loss Prevention, I would like to see improvements based on the many attacks happen...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 5% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 4% of the time
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One Logo
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
Twingate vs Cloudflare One Logo
Twingate vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
More Cloudflare One Competitors
Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo
Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Compared 5% of the time
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Compared 4% of the time
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 11% of the time
Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 9% of the time
Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 7% of the time
GTB Technologies Inspector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
GTB Technologies Inspector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 7% of the time
Palisade Systems PacketSure vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Palisade Systems PacketSure vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 5% of the time
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare One
March 2026
Cloudflare One reportDownload Cloudflare One product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reportDownload Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Symantec Data Loss Prevention reportDownload Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform
Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP
Symantec DLP
 

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?
  • Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
  • DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
  • Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
  • Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
  • Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
  • Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

Microsoft

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft. 

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

23andMe
Information Not Available
Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Free Report: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.