Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Logo

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
211 followers
Post review
 

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros review quotes

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2023
I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten.
reviewer2020164 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.
JH
May 13, 2021
The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1964613 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 26, 2024
When you are going to use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, most of the setup is already done by default as per your needs.
Roby Skariah - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.
reviewer2271795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 25, 2024
The solution's most valuable feature is the mature O365 DLP, which works with SharePoint and Teams.
Abdulkadir AKGUN - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 12, 2024
The tool's most valuable feature is in the area of OCR.
Bryan Sprowls - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 28, 2023
The product can block the uploads to cloud services.
LILIANE GUIDO - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2023
The product is easy to configure.
Subbu Madhira - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2022
There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.
 

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons review quotes

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2023
They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing.
reviewer2020164 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.
JH
May 13, 2021
There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1964613 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 26, 2024
All the security operations are better defined in Forcepoint, while in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, you will have to use a specific workflow and then an application to release blocked emails.
Roby Skariah - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that.
reviewer2271795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 25, 2024
A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting.
Abdulkadir AKGUN - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 12, 2024
The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic.
Bryan Sprowls - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 28, 2023
The support is poor.
LILIANE GUIDO - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2023
The solution should provide better integration with other systems.
Subbu Madhira - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2022
Technical support is awful.