Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE comparison

"There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems."

"For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information."

"The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas."

"The solution's IDM (Indexed Document Matching), EDM (Exact Data Matching), and DCM (Described Content Matching) features have been most effective in identifying and mitigating potential data leaks."

"The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's responses are faster. Its installation is also reliable. The security score helps with the security part."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the mature O365 DLP, which works with SharePoint and Teams."

"The product has improved compliance and confidence. We are aware of the data that is leaving our organization. It provides confidence in data management and information storage."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

"A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting."

"The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic."

"The AI advancements can improve the false positives."

"We faced a performance issue with the tool when we didn't get alerts for file uploads."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

"Technical support is awful."

"There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive."

"They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"The product needs to improve support."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

"Safetica ONE is expensive."