Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cloudflare based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Quad9, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cloudflare surpasses its competitors by offering robust security features, lightning-fast content delivery, and innovative DDoS protection, ensuring seamless online experiences while maintaining superior website performance and reliability.
Cloudflare Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cloudflare, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cloudflare offers DDoS protection, CDN, and DNS management for reduced load times and resource use. In comparison, Wiz excels with cloud security management, providing insights and risk prioritization. While Cloudflare focuses on speed, Wiz emphasizes comprehensive cloud environment visibility and security.
Cloudflare's setup cost is minimal, focusing on affordability, whereas Wiz presents a higher upfront cost, justifying it with advanced features. The differences in pricing reflect their distinct target audiences and feature offerings.
Cloudflare's setup cost is minimal, focusing on affordability, whereas Wiz presents a higher upfront cost, justifying it with advanced features. The differences in pricing reflect their distinct target audiences and feature offerings.
Cloudflare excels in security and performance with its comprehensive feature suite supporting business-scale needs. In comparison, Quad9 focuses on privacy and simplicity with effortless setup. Tech buyers might choose Cloudflare for robust features or Quad9 for straightforward and privacy-centric services without cost.
Cloudflare excels in CDN services with automation and configurable caching for enhancing site performance. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates with Azure for robust threat intelligence and compliance management, appealing to tech buyers focused on comprehensive security within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves a more complex pricing structure. Cloudflare's pricing is simpler compared to the tiered approach of Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves a more complex pricing structure. Cloudflare's pricing is simpler compared to the tiered approach of Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Cloudflare offers streamlined web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DNS management, ideal for cost-effective implementations. In comparison, Prisma Cloud focuses on cloud security and compliance, providing advanced monitoring tools for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security posture management.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides a more comprehensive solution with higher initial investment, catering to businesses needing extensive security features.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides a more comprehensive solution with higher initial investment, catering to businesses needing extensive security features.
Cloudflare excels in CDN caching and DDoS protection, making it ideal for those prioritizing website performance. In comparison, Darktrace's AI-driven threat detection is appealing for businesses needing comprehensive security monitoring for complex threats. Cloudflare offers scalable plans, while Darktrace provides advanced, albeit costly, security solutions.
Cloudflare has a lower setup cost compared to Darktrace, which may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious users seeking efficient security solutions.
Cloudflare has a lower setup cost compared to Darktrace, which may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious users seeking efficient security solutions.
Cloudflare provides ease of use with essential CDN and security features appealing to small businesses. In comparison, Imperva delivers advanced security and analytics ideal for larger organizations needing detailed configurations, despite its higher cost. Cloudflare's affordable tier contrasts with Imperva's comprehensive investment.
Azure Front Door offers advanced features like a web application firewall and scalable load-balancing for performance, while Cloudflare focuses on CDN caching and DDoS protection. In comparison, Cloudflare provides value through various plan levels, and Azure Front Door excels in ease of deployment.
Cloudflare typically offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Azure Front Door, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users, while Azure Front Door's setup may involve higher costs due to its extensive network integration options.
Cloudflare typically offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Azure Front Door, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users, while Azure Front Door's setup may involve higher costs due to its extensive network integration options.
Tenable Security Center provides detailed dashboards and precise scanning, ideal for robust security insight. In comparison, Cloudflare offers CDN and DDoS protection, enhancing web performance. Tenable suits those needing deep security management, while Cloudflare appeals to businesses prioritizing web traffic optimization.
Tenable Security Center offers a detailed setup cost structure, while Cloudflare provides a more streamlined approach, highlighting a key difference in pricing transparency.
Tenable Security Center offers a detailed setup cost structure, while Cloudflare provides a more streamlined approach, highlighting a key difference in pricing transparency.
Cloudflare excels in DDoS protection, CDN caching, and website optimization, appealing to users seeking enhanced security and ease of deployment. In comparison, Azure DNS's strong domain management and seamless Azure integration suit businesses invested in Azure, offering indirect cost benefits.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup with low costs, while Azure DNS may involve higher initial expenses. The pricing structures highlight Cloudflare's budget-friendly approach compared to Azure DNS's potentially greater initial investment.
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup with low costs, while Azure DNS may involve higher initial expenses. The pricing structures highlight Cloudflare's budget-friendly approach compared to Azure DNS's potentially greater initial investment.
Cloudflare's strengths lie in CDN caching and DDoS protection, appealing to security-conscious businesses. In comparison, Amazon Route 53 is ideal for those prioritizing DNS management with AWS integration, offering scale flexibility through its pay-as-you-use pricing model.
Cloudflare offers extensive features from free to paid plans suitable for diverse businesses. In comparison, Arbor DDoS provides high-performance protection ideal for large enterprises without free options. Cloudflare integrates DNS and CDN effectively, while Arbor excels in threat intelligence and traffic analysis.
Cloudflare provides CDN capabilities, aggressive caching, and security features for efficient load time and reduced bandwidth. In comparison, IBM NS1 Connect is valued for its real-time telemetry and flexibility in traffic management, offering a detailed approach to automating operations within infrastructure-as-code environments.
Cloudflare has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM NS1 Connect involves more complex pricing. Cloudflare's simplicity contrasts with IBM NS1 Connect's potential for a tailored approach.
Cloudflare has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM NS1 Connect involves more complex pricing. Cloudflare's simplicity contrasts with IBM NS1 Connect's potential for a tailored approach.
Akamai stands out with advanced security and a robust global CDN, ideal for enterprise infrastructure. In comparison, Cloudflare offers simple integrations, expansive API access, and cost-effectiveness, attracting businesses valuing rapid deployment and responsive support while meeting various market needs.
Akamai setup costs are higher compared to Cloudflare's more economical initial expenses. This difference highlights Akamai's focus on comprehensive solutions, while Cloudflare offers a budget-friendly setup, appealing to different customer priorities.
Akamai setup costs are higher compared to Cloudflare's more economical initial expenses. This difference highlights Akamai's focus on comprehensive solutions, while Cloudflare offers a budget-friendly setup, appealing to different customer priorities.
Cloudflare attracts customers with robust security and performance features suited for straightforward deployment. In comparison, Google Cloud DNS appeals to those needing seamless integration and scalability within Google's ecosystem, offering better long-term value for enterprises leveraging extensive Google Cloud services.
Cloudflare provides a cost-effective setup, while Google Cloud DNS incurs a higher initial expense, highlighting the difference in their pricing approach.
Cloudflare provides a cost-effective setup, while Google Cloud DNS incurs a higher initial expense, highlighting the difference in their pricing approach.
Cloudflare offers speed enhancements with free CDN caching, ideal for small to medium sites. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides advanced multi-cloud security and compliance tools, suitable for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive threats visibility and control across diverse cloud environments.
Cloudflare offers a simplified setup with lower initial costs, while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP involves a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses.
Cloudflare offers a simplified setup with lower initial costs, while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP involves a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses.
Cloudflare is known for competitive pricing and ease of deployment, appealing to small businesses with effective DDoS protection and DNS management. In comparison, Akamai offers advanced threat intelligence and superior security measures, making it a preferred choice for large enterprises despite higher costs.
Cloudflare offers a competitive setup cost with simplified integration, while Akamai App and API Protector presents a higher investment with robust initial configurations.
Cloudflare offers a competitive setup cost with simplified integration, while Akamai App and API Protector presents a higher investment with robust initial configurations.
Cloudflare enhances speed and security with CDN capabilities, aggressive caching, and efficient DDoS protection. In comparison, Trend Vision One emphasizes multi-cloud security and intrusion prevention. A tech buyer might choose Cloudflare for CDN improvements, while Trend Vision One appeals for enhanced security analysis and flexibility.
Cloudflare offers extensive features like CDN caching and comprehensive DNS management, appealing for easy integration and scalability. In comparison, Radware focuses on advanced DDoS protection and customizable deployment models, attracting those needing robust network security and flexible configurations.
Cloudflare boasts a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Radware DDoS involves a more complex implementation and higher setup expenses.
Cloudflare boasts a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Radware DDoS involves a more complex implementation and higher setup expenses.
Cloudflare enhances performance and security with extensive caching, DDoS protection, flexible SSL, and CDN capabilities. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in security compliance, offering insights into threats and vulnerabilities. Cloudflare’s flexible deployment contrasts with Lacework’s focus on detailed security and compliance features.
Cloudflare enhances website performance with DNS management and CDN caching, appealing to tech buyers focused on domain-level security. In comparison, Sysdig Secure offers comprehensive cloud-native security, attracting buyers needing runtime security, particularly beneficial for organizations using Kubernetes for application monitoring.
Cloudflare excels in security and CDN features, ideal for optimizing websites efficiently. In comparison, BlueCat Integrity provides robust DNS management and scalable enterprise solutions, making it suitable for organizations needing extensive infrastructure management and compliance. Both offer distinct advantages depending on business requirements.
Cloudflare offers lower setup costs compared to BlueCat Integrity, providing a more cost-effective solution for businesses with tighter budgets. BlueCat Integrity, however, may involve higher initial expenses, potentially suited for organizations seeking comprehensive features.
Cloudflare offers lower setup costs compared to BlueCat Integrity, providing a more cost-effective solution for businesses with tighter budgets. BlueCat Integrity, however, may involve higher initial expenses, potentially suited for organizations seeking comprehensive features.
Cloudflare offers scalable solutions with flexible pricing, appealing for quick deployment across different cloud environments. In comparison, Infoblox DDI focuses on superior network management capabilities, making it ideal for enterprises needing robust IP address and DNS security management.
Cloudflare offers lower setup costs compared to Infoblox DDI, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking initial cost savings. Infoblox DDI's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
Cloudflare offers lower setup costs compared to Infoblox DDI, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking initial cost savings. Infoblox DDI's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
Cloudflare offers a free plan with versatile security features, catering to users who need simple yet effective solutions. In comparison, Amazon CloudFront provides seamless AWS integration and robust global content delivery, making it ideal for enterprises relying on AWS infrastructure.
Cloudflare offers a cost-efficient setup, whereas Amazon CloudFront requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in entry-level pricing. Cloudflare appeals to budget-conscious users, while Amazon CloudFront targets those looking for premium options from th...
Cloudflare offers a cost-efficient setup, whereas Amazon CloudFront requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in entry-level pricing. Cloudflare appeals to budget-conscious users, while Amazon CloudFront targets those looking for premium options from th...
Cloudflare provides a versatile solution with a broad feature range, including CDN and DNS management. In comparison, Azure DDoS Protection offers superior security within its ecosystem, appealing to those requiring high-security integration with Azure services and efficient threat protection.
Cloudflare offers a streamlined setup with minimal initial costs, while Azure DDoS Protection requires a more substantial initial financial commitment, highlighting a notable difference in setup expenses.
Cloudflare offers a streamlined setup with minimal initial costs, while Azure DDoS Protection requires a more substantial initial financial commitment, highlighting a notable difference in setup expenses.
Cloudflare stands out for its competitive pricing and ease of deployment, appealing to budget-conscious businesses with strong security features. In comparison, Fastly is ideal for those prioritizing speed and configuration flexibility, despite its higher initial cost, thanks to advanced performance capabilities.
Cloudflare excels in CDN and DDoS protection with features like a web application firewall and flexible SSL. In comparison, AWS Shield focuses on seamless DDoS integration with services like Elastic Load Balancer, appealing to enterprises needing network-level attack prevention.
Cloudflare has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses seeking simplicity, while AWS Shield offers a more complex setup with a scalable pricing model, demonstrating a key difference in their approach to initial deployment costs.
Cloudflare has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses seeking simplicity, while AWS Shield offers a more complex setup with a scalable pricing model, demonstrating a key difference in their approach to initial deployment costs.
Cloudflare excels with broad CDN and free basic features, ideal for general website optimization. In comparison, Uplynk's focus on media streaming and API optimization makes it suitable for mobile apps. Cloudflare's versatility and Uplynk's media-specific capabilities cater to differing tech buyer needs.
Cloudflare appeals to cost-conscious tech buyers with competitive pricing and a user-friendly deployment process, emphasizing speed and scalability. In comparison, F5 Distributed Cloud Services suits those valuing feature richness and integrated security, despite higher initial costs, offering long-term value through comprehensive capabilities.
Cloudflare excels with robust security features, including DDoS protection and application firewalls. In comparison, AWS Global Accelerator focuses on latency optimization and advanced routing. While Cloudflare offers attractive pricing, AWS provides enhanced performance. Tech buyers may favor Cloudflare for cost-efficiency or AWS for superior infrastructure.
Cloudflare excels in CDN, DNS, and security features, making it ideal for performance optimization. In comparison, Kentik offers detailed network analytics and real-time insights. Cloudflare's ease of setup appeals to users, while Kentik's analytics attract those needing in-depth traffic analysis.
Cloudflare offers a simple setup cost structure, while Kentik provides a more flexible yet potentially higher initial cost. Each platform's pricing approach reflects its unique market positioning and target audience.
Cloudflare offers a simple setup cost structure, while Kentik provides a more flexible yet potentially higher initial cost. Each platform's pricing approach reflects its unique market positioning and target audience.
Cloudflare provides efficient, cost-effective DNS services with seamless security integration, ideal for businesses seeking quick deployment. In comparison, Akamai Edge DNS offers extensive global reach and advanced customizable solutions, suited for enterprises valuing robust security measures and detailed analytics.
Cloudflare's setup cost is lower than Akamai Edge DNS, making it a more affordable option. Akamai Edge DNS offers comprehensive features at a higher setup cost, as compared to Cloudflare.
Cloudflare's setup cost is lower than Akamai Edge DNS, making it a more affordable option. Akamai Edge DNS offers comprehensive features at a higher setup cost, as compared to Cloudflare.
Cloudflare offers cost-effective solutions with CDN, DDoS protection, and website security for smaller businesses. In comparison, F5 Silverline provides comprehensive security and real-time attack mitigation for larger organizations. Cloudflare attracts with affordability, while F5 Silverline appeals with premium security.
Cloudflare's setup cost is often seen as lower and straightforward, while F5 Silverline Managed Services is noted for being higher but offering bespoke implementation features.
Cloudflare's setup cost is often seen as lower and straightforward, while F5 Silverline Managed Services is noted for being higher but offering bespoke implementation features.
Cloudflare offers efficient deployment and strong customer service with its cost-effective DDoS protection and web application firewall. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center provides comprehensive asset visibility and threat intelligence, despite a complex deployment process, making it ideal for advanced security needs.
Cloudflare offers a simple setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center requires more complex setup procedures, leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
Cloudflare offers a simple setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center requires more complex setup procedures, leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
Cloudflare offers competitive pricing and ease of deployment, ideal for businesses of all sizes. In comparison, Prolexic focuses on high-volume attack mitigation and advanced features, suited for enterprises needing specialized security. Each solution appeals to distinct market needs.
Cloudflare offers a more budget-friendly setup cost compared to Prolexic, which comes with a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two services.
Cloudflare offers a more budget-friendly setup cost compared to Prolexic, which comes with a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two services.
Cloudflare provides flexible CDN, caching, and security features, appealing to businesses with diverse needs for website performance improvement. In comparison, Fortinet FortiDDoS offers robust DDoS mitigation for enterprises needing extensive on-premises security solutions, addressing high-capacity challenges with significant effectivity.
Cloudflare offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Fortinet FortiDDoS, which is often perceived as having a higher initial setup cost. This difference highlights Cloudflare's focus on budget-friendly implementation.
Cloudflare offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Fortinet FortiDDoS, which is often perceived as having a higher initial setup cost. This difference highlights Cloudflare's focus on budget-friendly implementation.
Cloudflare excels in pricing flexibility and features like CDN caching and SSL options, appealing to diverse businesses with its adaptability. In comparison, Link11 targets enterprises with advanced DDoS mitigation and security measures, offering comprehensive protection for organizations prioritizing centralized, robust solutions.
Cloudflare excels in pricing and customer service, offering high performance and scalability for web security. In comparison, Corero stands out with robust DDoS mitigation and real-time protection. Tech buyers might choose Cloudflare for cost-effective security, while Corero suits those needing specialized threat detection.
Cloudflare excels with high performance through its content delivery network, attracting tech buyers seeking scalability. In comparison, Sucuri's robust security features, like its firewall and malware detection, cater to those prioritizing website security, with attentive customer service justifying its higher initial setup cost.
Cloudflare offers a lower setup cost compared to Sucuri, appealing for budget-conscious users, while Sucuri's higher setup cost reflects its premium features.
Cloudflare offers a lower setup cost compared to Sucuri, appealing for budget-conscious users, while Sucuri's higher setup cost reflects its premium features.
Cloudflare offers a comprehensive feature set and quick integration, appealing to those seeking enhanced security and performance. In comparison, Hurricane Electric Free DNS provides reliable, zero-cost service, making it ideal for budget-conscious users needing solid DNS resolution and IPv6 support.
Cloudflare has a simple setup with minimal costs, while Hurricane Electric Free DNS offers a straightforward, cost-free setup, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
Cloudflare has a simple setup with minimal costs, while Hurricane Electric Free DNS offers a straightforward, cost-free setup, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
Cloudflare excels with advanced caching and DDoS protection, appealing to budget-conscious users. In comparison, Windows Azure CDN offers dynamic content acceleration, integrating seamlessly with Azure services, ideal for those within the Azure ecosystem seeking robust cloud synergy.
Cloudflare offers a free setup cost, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users, whereas Windows Azure CDN has a setup cost that may suit larger enterprises seeking additional features.
Cloudflare offers a free setup cost, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users, whereas Windows Azure CDN has a setup cost that may suit larger enterprises seeking additional features.
Cloudflare offers competitive pricing and a robust support system, appealing to cost-conscious businesses needing scalable DDoS protection. In comparison, Nexusguard focuses on deep learning and customizable solutions, attracting enterprises seeking precise threat detection and willing to invest in advanced security features.
Cloudflare provides ease of deployment and cost-effective DDoS protection, ideal for diverse setups. In comparison, A10 Thunder TPS offers advanced threat intelligence with more complex deployment, appealing to enterprises needing detailed network control and willing to invest in robust features.
Cloudflare offers a low setup cost model with automatic updates, while A10 Thunder TPS incurs higher initial expenses due to its robust infrastructure.
Cloudflare offers a low setup cost model with automatic updates, while A10 Thunder TPS incurs higher initial expenses due to its robust infrastructure.
Cloudflare offers DDoS protection and network performance benefits. In comparison, SiteLock provides malware scanning and comprehensive security features. While Cloudflare is known for easy deployment, SiteLock appeals with hands-on customer service. Cloudflare’s flexible pricing suits many, whereas SiteLock’s targeted security justifies its cost.
Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while SiteLock typically involves higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in setup costs between the two solutions.
Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while SiteLock typically involves higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in setup costs between the two solutions.
Cloudflare excels with a diverse feature set, making it ideal for varied needs, reflecting its expansive network and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Myra Security offers tailored industry-specific solutions, appealing to niche markets that require specialized security protocols and targeted support.
Cloudflare offers a robust CDN for performance and protection against DDoS. In comparison, Comodo cWatch focuses on comprehensive security with advanced threat detection. Cloudflare appeals to those needing simple integration, while Comodo cWatch suits businesses prioritizing in-depth cybersecurity.
Cloudflare excels in security features like DDoS protection and offers flexible pricing for diverse business needs. In comparison, G-Core Labs CDN stands out with competitive pricing and global network performance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing affordability and rapid content delivery.
Cloudflare offers a free setup cost, while G-Core Labs CDN charges an initial fee, highlighting a clear cost advantage for Cloudflare in the setup phase.
Cloudflare offers a free setup cost, while G-Core Labs CDN charges an initial fee, highlighting a clear cost advantage for Cloudflare in the setup phase.
Cloudflare leads with economical pricing, enhanced performance, and strong support, attracting those seeking swift deployment and advanced security. In comparison, Verisign Public DNS emphasizes reliable uptime and scalability, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing long-term stability and consistent, dependable service.
Cloudflare has no setup cost, while Verisign Public DNS requires an initial investment. This difference highlights Cloudflare's immediate cost advantage in setup for users.
Cloudflare has no setup cost, while Verisign Public DNS requires an initial investment. This difference highlights Cloudflare's immediate cost advantage in setup for users.
Cloudflare offers CDN, caching, and DDoS protection, ideal for enhancing site performance with simplified DNS and SSL. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP AFM provides robust network protection through LTM, APM, and AFM, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive network security solutions.
Cloudflare offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP AFM, which tends to have higher initial expenses due to its robust feature set. This cost difference highlights contrasting priorities in ease of deployment versus comprehensive feature richness.
Cloudflare offers a more straightforward setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP AFM, which tends to have higher initial expenses due to its robust feature set. This cost difference highlights contrasting priorities in ease of deployment versus comprehensive feature richness.
Dyn provides reliable DNS management focusing on stability and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those needing essential DNS solutions. In comparison, Cloudflare's comprehensive feature suite including CDN and security measures offers a broad scope of benefits, justifying its higher initial investment for robust security and performance.
Cloudflare offers advanced security features, a global CDN, and fast performance optimization with scalable pricing. In comparison, No-IP Managed DNS excels in dynamic DNS solutions and personalized service, providing cost-effective options for users with specific DNS management needs and a straightforward setup process.
Cloudflare offers a no-cost setup while No-IP Managed DNS carries a minimal initial fee. The setup cost difference highlights Cloudflare's appealing entry-level pricing compared to No-IP's moderate initial investment.
Cloudflare offers a no-cost setup while No-IP Managed DNS carries a minimal initial fee. The setup cost difference highlights Cloudflare's appealing entry-level pricing compared to No-IP's moderate initial investment.
