McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

"This solution has a rich set of policies."

"The initial setup process was easy."

"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."

"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."

"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."

"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."

"The product is largely stable."

"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."

"For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information."

"The tool's most valuable feature is in the area of OCR."

"We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

"If we can prevent information from going out, eventually, when a regulator is asking about our security measures, we can show what we've been doing."

"The product is easy to configure."

"The solution's IDM (Indexed Document Matching), EDM (Exact Data Matching), and DCM (Described Content Matching) features have been most effective in identifying and mitigating potential data leaks."

"It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated."

"When you are going to use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, most of the setup is already done by default as per your needs."

"The initial setup is very complex."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by making the customer aware of the benefits of the solution which would increase the adoption. Additionally, if there were features to suit multi-cloud environments it would be helpful. If the solution can intelligently identify which is important data for the organization and should not be released from the organization without authorization would be a benefit."

"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."

"The AI advancements can improve the false positives."

"I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more."

"The scalability, in terms of the portal, could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have faced difficulties in identifying the options."

"Technical support is awful."

"We faced a performance issue with the tool when we didn't get alerts for file uploads."

"There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive."

"There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful."

"A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."