

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Netwrix Endpoint Protector both compete in the data security category. Netwrix Endpoint Protector seems to have the upper hand due to its device control, content-aware protection, and strong cross-platform support.
Features: McAfee focuses on intuitive deployment, effective USB blocking, and complete DLP capabilities. Netwrix emphasizes device control, content-aware protection, and zero-day macOS protection, supporting role-based access and hybrid environments.
Room for Improvement: McAfee users note issues with resource usage, complex GUI, and support. Enhanced processing efficiency, GUI design, and virtual desktop features are desired. Netwrix struggles with policy granularity and Linux support, with users wanting more customizable policies and consistent macOS features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both McAfee and Netwrix are primarily on-premises, with McAfee being more adaptable to public clouds. McAfee's technical support has variable response times, while Netwrix offers reliable initial setup support but faces challenges in ongoing assistance.
Pricing and ROI: McAfee is generally more expensive with high licensing costs and additional charges for support, but users report mixed ROI. Netwrix offers budget-friendly pricing with satisfactory ROI, leaving room for pricing adjustments, especially with long-term or volume-based models.
Improvements could be made in response time or quality as all of them can be rated a seven.
When the implementation occurred, we were functional within a month, with no need for follow-up support.
I would rate the technical support for Netwrix Endpoint Protector as a nine because we have trained engineers, and I am also trained.
Everything starts from the endpoint, and we maintain the Endpoint DLP in many cases while working alongside existing DLP systems.
If we had predominantly based our systems on Mac and Windows, it would have been very smooth sailing for us.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
The product has been around for over 15 years now and is very stable because I started using them from version three.
Stability-wise, the solution is stable; we experienced no downtimes during our two years of usage.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
I see enhancement in reporting for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention as a potential area of improvement to think from a data asset perspective, not from a policy perspective, and do more analysis regarding the user's perspective rather than the policy's perspective.
Netwrix is known as the best DLP for Apple Macintosh computers, which is noteworthy.
Not all the policies applied to the Linux clients were as effective as those for Mac and Windows.
I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap product and not an expensive product.
We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention.
I find unique value in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention specifically in controlling the application from a DLP perspective; when a computer downloads a package, you can understand where it downloaded this package from, and you can create a policy regarding the source of the download.
Assuming if there's a breach, we will be able to know exactly where the breach has occurred and what has occurred, and they are quite granular in how they report their information, including their logs.
License utilization was a concern as when we were changing the hostname from asset category to asset tag and from personal hostnames to asset tags, it started taking multiple licenses.
Netwrix Endpoint Protector works on Linux and macOS to block USB ports, control internet access, and manage other peripheral ports.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Netwrix Endpoint Protector | 1.8% |
| McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention provides comprehensive security through robust data loss prevention, USB control, and endpoint protection. It is valued for its stability, scalability, and ease of management, offering significant policy customization and integration capabilities.
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention addresses compliance issues, human error, and unauthorized data sharing. It integrates well with ePO, offering virtual desktop security and affordability, which contributes to comprehensive threat monitoring. While praised for its stability, it faces challenges with pricing, resource consumption, and UI complexity. Users report slow customer support and desire advanced AI features, enhanced protection against sophisticated attacks, and better policy flexibility.
What are the key features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?Organizations deploy McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention to secure sensitive data, prevent unauthorized leaks, and improve endpoint protection. It is commonly used by banks, consulting firms, and service providers for monitoring, controlling data flows, enforcing security policies, encrypting data, and ensuring compliance, often integrating into existing infrastructures to protect against external threats while maintaining internal data integrity.
Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers comprehensive data loss prevention on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It manages USB controls and ensures data security by monitoring file transfers. Its intuitive dashboard and granular policy control make it a popular choice for securing endpoints.
Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels at safeguarding sensitive information by enforcing data encryption, controlling device access, and monitoring data movements such as clipboard actions and external device usage. This tool provides robust support and employs role-based access control, enhancing efficiency in preventing unauthorized data exfiltration. While users appreciate its capabilities, improvements in policy customization and deployment are necessary, alongside enhanced coordination across operating systems. Users also face challenges with uninstallation issues and require better network-level DLP features and interface stability.
What are the key features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector?Organizations across sectors employ Netwrix Endpoint Protector for data loss prevention, compliance, and monitoring capabilities. Its strength in managing device access and securing data on Windows, Linux, and Mac platforms makes it ideal for enterprises seeking to protect sensitive information. The tool's ability to support remote work enhances its appeal in diverse operational settings.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.