We performed a comparison between Accedian Skylight and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Accedian Skylight is highly appreciated for its intuitive interface, advanced analytics capabilities, and exceptional performance. Datadog stands out for its advantageous offerings like customizable dashboards, and extensive integration options. Accedian Skylight has potential for enhancement by including a localized cloud option in Vietnam, improving reporting capabilities, facilitating solution updates without requiring repurchases, offering competitive pricing for NetFlow connection, and enhancing the user interface. Datadog can improve usability, integration, monitoring of external websites, security features, customization flexibility, documentation, and ease of implementation.
Service and Support: Accedian Skylight's customer service is highly regarded for its quick and knowledgeable assistance. Datadog's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback, with some users appreciating their promptness and accessibility, while others have faced delays and unresolved problems.
Ease of Deployment: Accedian Skylight's initial setup can range from simple and well-documented to challenging for network novices. Datadog's setup is generally seen as easy, but some users found it slightly complex and involved multiple teams for adjustments.
ROI: Accedian Skylight has consistently demonstrated a favorable return on investment for more than a decade. Users have reported different experiences with Datadog's ROI. Some users appreciate the time-saving and reduced blindspots it offers, while others value its ability to quickly debug live sites and save on labor.
Pricing: Users have differing opinions on the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it costly and others finding it reasonable in comparison to other options. Nonetheless, the pricing structure is perplexing and lacks proper documentation. On the other hand, Accedian Skylight's pricing is generally competitive, but since being acquired, the prices have risen significantly, posing difficulties in selling the product.
Comparison Results: Accedian Skylight is the preferred choice over Datadog. Users praise Accedian Skylight for its user-friendly interface, superior performance, helpful support, and detailed documentation for easy implementation.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The performance of Accedian Skylight is better than other vendors."
"The solution’s UI and single pane of glass is good. The new dashboard is modern with its new design. The look of it is not pretty, but it is efficient, which is good. It is user-friendly; you can find what you need on the interface quickly."
"I think the analytics features are okay. My customer also likes the interface, the GUI, because it's easy to operate."
"It is about finding operational problems. When sites go down, we try to determine who is at fault. While there is not much finger-pointing, the solution is just trying to analyse when there is an outage and where do we start looking to fix it. The very nature of why organization chooses to use the solution is to accelerate the meantime to resolution and find where problems lie to get them rectified as quickly as possible."
"This solution has helped to improve the interaction between our network, datacenter, and application teams. I have used other tools, but this tool can pinpoint the root cause of my application or network issue in the majority of the cases. So, it helps different divisions or groups in the IT department to troubleshoot together and get an issue resolved. This tool helps a lot in our day-to-day networking application and IT operations."
"Capturing traffic [is very interesting]. Currently, with our configuration, we don't capture the payload of the packets, just the header. But when we want the body, the payload of the packets, we can do a PCAP, and then analyze it within Wireshark."
"The feature I used to like the most was its ability to decode layer seven protocols, although this is becoming less useful now that encryption is so widespread."
"I always have the Skylight dashboard on one of my screens... Now you can create your own dashboard, specific to an application, specific to a server, or to something else."
"Most of the features in the way Datadog does monitoring are commendable and that is the reason we choose it. We did some comparisons before picking Datadog. Datadog was recommended based on the features provided."
"It has scaled great. I haven't run into any problems anywhere that I've used it. They have handled everything that we have needed them to."
"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."
"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."
"Integrating Datadog with other platforms has made our monitoring processes a bit easier. It's not super simple, but it's manageable."
"The RUM solution has improved our ability to triage faster and hand more capabilities to our customer support."
"The most valuable features have been: Sharable dashboards, TimeBoards, dogstatsd API, Slack Integration, Event logging API. CloudTrail Events, Tags, alerts, and anomaly detection. EBS Volume Snapshot Age, which they added upon request."
"The most valuable aspect is for us to have everything in one place."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"It's a bit slow. When I execute a query, something general with a short timeframe that covers one month, for instance, and I do not specify the IP source or IP destination, it can take ages because it has to query the whole database."
"Because of the policies in Vietnam, we cannot connect the system to the Accedian cloud. It would be good if Accedian could provide a local cloud. In the next release, I would like them to focus on improving and adding more reporting features. This will help the operations teams."
"If you want a new version, you go to the website. The hardest part is finding the link, where is that .bin file? Sometimes it's pretty hidden in a document... it's hidden in the release notes or in another file somewhere. And it's usually not on the first page either."
"The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."
"This solution is expensive compared to some others."
"For the PVX, they are in the process of getting the results to export to cloud and SaaS for analytics. They told me that this will happen later this year. Right now, for the most part, I create that data myself."
"Some of the Skylight applications are a little newer, and they're still moving through initial revs. There are certain bugs, but nothing is insurmountable... It will just take a little bit of time for their user interface to get a little bit better."
"I would like to see some improvements in parts of their synthetic transactions, which includes all the latency, jitter, and throughput. I would like to see some Layer 7 analytics in there. I want to be able to do a DNS request, HTTP GET request, or even SIP call point-to-point or via registration."
"We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error."
"It can have a more modernized pricing mechanism. We're actually working with them to figure out how to become more modular and have a better and more modernized pricing mechanism. The issue with Datadog is that you have to buy the whole suite of different products, and you kind of get stuck in the old utilization of 40% of their suite. Most organizations today break down between application development, networking, and security. Therefore, there should be a way to break down different modules into just app dev, infosec, networking, etc. Customers have various needs across their business lines, and sometimes, they're just not willing to have tools that they're not using 100%. AppDynamics is probably a little bit better in terms of being modular."
"It lacks consistency in the APIs."
"The solution should provide alerts for cloud outages."
"When it comes to storing the logs with Datadog, I'm not sure why it costs so much to store gigabytes or terabytes of information when it's a fraction of the cost to do so myself."
"Auto instrumentation on tracing has not been very easy to find in the documentation."
"When the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us."
"The pricing is a bit confusing."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Accedian Skylight is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 23 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Accedian Skylight is rated 9.0, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Accedian Skylight writes "Highly scalable, responsive support, but lacking new features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Accedian Skylight is most compared with ThousandEyes, SolarWinds NPM, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Dynatrace and Niagara Visibility Controller, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability. See our Accedian Skylight vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.