We performed a comparison between Anaplan and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Production Planning solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Anaplan's in-memory calculation engine is super-fast compared to the old tools we previously used. You enter the data and everything shows up in one go."
"You don't need to have a programming language to use Anaplan."
"This product has a very good modeling feature, and its graphical representation of visualizations has also been valuable."
"It's simple to use with a lot of functions."
"I believe Anaplan is a new cloud tool, and from time to time, there's a lot of improvement that the Anaplan company deploys with the system. So, with that improvement, we need to really adapt and know the new system trends."
"The most valuable feature of Anaplan is machine learning. The solution is constantly evolving from feedback. Additionally, there is a wide range of training material online."
"Anaplan provides 130 GB of cloud storage for organizations to use as part of their license."
"The best thing is that it's very intuitive and user-friendly. You don't need coding skills to manipulate the platform."
"It’s a stable product."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"There are numerous good features."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"Anaplan is a relatively expensive piece of software."
"The negative is that the higher the flexibility, the higher is the complexity. That can act against you as a negative because it does require a model builder or a coder/developer."
"Automation needs to be built into this solution."
"The tool needs to work on its integration with MS Excel and MS Word. The tool does not allow data analysis in spreadsheets which is possible on other platforms. I want the solution to be more collaborative to facilitate decision-making in organizations."
"One area of improvement is conditional formatting. It's not very practical, and you need to specify additional formatting."
"There are workspace issues, like the limitation on model sizes."
"The solution could improve by better dashboards and while entering the form loss and project implementation the ability to use graphical shapes more effectively."
"The solution can improve by providing an easier form of integration to different platforms, such as receiving data from different Salesforce. There is a process to do it through the use of some APIs but it could be made much easier. This would be a large help to us."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
Anaplan is ranked 6th in Production Planning with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 2nd in Production Planning with 55 reviews. Anaplan is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anaplan writes "Great for large-scale modelling, easy to learn, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Anaplan is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleSoft. See our Anaplan vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best Production Planning vendors.
We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.