We performed a comparison between Appian and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"Technical support is helpful."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"The tech support is quite good."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"The solution could improve by being more responsive when dealing with large quantities of data. Additionally, they can make the decision or rules engine better. It cannot handle too many rules or too many decisions at once."
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda and webMethods Integration Server. See our Appian vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.