We compared Zabbix and Auvik across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: Zabbix and Auvik reviewers indicate that the duration required for deployment, setup, and implementation can vary. While some users spent three months on deployment and a week on setup for both products, others mentioned spending a week for both phases.
Valuable Features: Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerts, and extensive reporting options. Auvik excels at network visibility, efficient monitoring, intuitive interface, automation capabilities, and detailed reporting.
Room For Improvement: Zabbix could improve its user interface, documentation, and performance. Auvik could enhance its performance and user experience.
Cost: Zabbix has no licensing costs. Auvik has minimal setup costs and straightforward licensing. Users appreciate Auvik's transparent and flexible pricing plans.
ROI: Zabbix has shown positive outcomes and benefits, while Auvik has delivered increased efficiency, improved visibility, and enhanced troubleshooting.
Customer Service: Zabbix's customer service and support have been praised for their promptness, effectiveness, and expertise. Auvik's customer service is commended for its knowledgeable, friendly staff and willingness to go above and beyond.
Reviewers prefer Zabbix over Auvik due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerting system, and extensive reporting options. While Auvik offers comprehensive network visibility and an intuitive user interface, Zabbix stands out with its customizable alerts and extensive reporting options.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"Being able to see things like the hardware lifecycle, if our equipment is up to date, if connections are broken, or whether there are physical line breaks, is helpful. We're able to determine connectivity issues. We can monitor pretty much anything that is network-related."
"The automated network topology map is excellent; it shows connected networks, where they're going, and what they're visible on."
"Automated configuration backups and automated network diagrams are the most valuable."
"Shadow IT monitoring is huge for us since so many of our customers are highly regulated."
"The topography and historical data are excellent; the latter essentially allows us to see back in time, which is helpful as users don't always report issues promptly. The ability to go back and look at historical data is a good feature."
"I like the way everything can be integrated. Auvik uses SMNP and various protocols to ensure we can monitor any device on the network."
"The network monitoring and backups of specific devices are really impressive. We've seen very good responses from our staff regarding the backup functionality. You can add a product, such as a switch and, once the product is added, it backs it up for you."
"Auvik's features for monitoring device availability and bandwidth utilization have greatly helped us. From a cybersecurity perspective, bandwidth utilization tells us if we have a potential data exfiltration incident. It also helps us decide whether to increase the bandwidth for one of the links or if the current bandwidth is sufficient."
"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."
"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"Health and communication links availability."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"The basic setup is very easy."
"It can send messages to our ticketing system."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Configuring alerts is pretty tedious. It would be nice if they had a wizard who walked you through instead of having everything turned on or off from the start."
"They can improve its monitoring capabilities for the physical servers or operating systems. At the moment, they do have some visibility. Even though you don't buy Auvik for monitoring your servers, and it is more for network monitoring, it would be nice if they can do end-to-end monitoring so that you don't have to use a different tool for operating system monitoring. You can get all the information from Auvik."
"It requires a lot of hands-on maintenance when it comes to cleanup. That's probably the biggest problem I've had, because I don't have a dedicated resource to manually clean up stale records. I have a customer where it shows 4,000 devices because of the duplication of devices that I have to clean up."
"I want to be able to customize the layout more in terms of showing the alert timeframes. For example, I would like to customize it to show all the alerts in the last three hours, six hours, etc. You should be able to customize it so that it shows you the most critical information. We don't need to see CPU usage. We only want to see the up and down time. It would be nice to filter out many of those metrics we don't use."
"The general feature set could use some work. For network mapping and network alerting, it's great for what it does. But it could provide more monitoring, such as jitter monitoring, which it doesn't have, and round-trip time for packets. I would like to see more network detail on the actual traffic that's flowing through the network."
"I would like to see some recommendations in terms of steps that could be taken to assess the alerts. A platform that I have used is Darktrace, which does security testing, and it let us know what was going on, what may have caused it, and what could be done... if Auvik could recommend common ways to go about doing what needs to be done to resolve an alert, that would be helpful."
"It would be cool if they came out with an app, but running the browser isn't bad."
"I would like to see improvement in terms of its integration with other applications and systems. I know that they are adding new systems. However, there is still work to be done there, such as integration with MS Teams. That is not working great for us."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"The product could be more secure and more stable."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"The graphical user interface could be customized a little bit more, and also the dashboard could be more friendly."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"The user interface could be a bit better. They could update it a bit."
"The event correlation could be better."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Auvik Network Management (ANM) is ranked 3rd in Network Monitoring Software with 139 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Auvik Network Management (ANM) is rated 8.8, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Auvik Network Management (ANM) writes "Enables us to get on top of issues before they become an outage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Auvik Network Management (ANM) is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Meraki Dashboard and Domotz, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
