Boomi iPaaS vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jitterbit Harmony
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (35th), Workload Automation (21st), Cloud Data Integration (19th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the market share of Boomi iPaaS is 8.6% and it decreased by 2.4% compared to the previous year. The market share of Jitterbit Harmony is 1.0% and it decreased by 41.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Data Integration
0.1%
 

Q&A Highlights

JM
Apr 12, 2018
 

Featured Reviews

OM
Dec 12, 2019
Fairly easy for a semi-technical user to configure and maintain it and is very visual
Boomi consists of several modules, and the API is one product that Boomi is definitely not up to par with. For example, Jitterbit has a better API management module. However, Dell is putting a lot of energy to make changes. There is a new release already now in December or in November (2019), and they're planning some more releases in 2020. But I would say if there is one module that Boomi is less advanced in than the competition it would be the API management. But it might be totally different mid-2020. Another point that could use improvement for Boomi is license pricing. If you don't know the pricing model very well, you might quickly end up paying more than you expected especially if you are growing and adding integrations. Again, it is different than the competition so it may be difficult to compare, but the pricing model could also clearly be simplified.
it_user647439 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 15, 2017
The product integrates well with our CRM.
Easy integration with Salesforce Point and click Wizards We use this product for our clients. There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data. We have used this product for eight months. The product is stable. We haven't…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
 

Cons

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."
"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"Approximately 20k annually."
"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."
"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
"Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
"I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
"Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
"The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
"The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
"The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

JM
Apr 12, 2018
Apr 12, 2018
From my point of view, the Microsoft Azure solution (APIM, ServiceBus, VPN GateWay etc.) will be the most suitable for the scenario described.
2 out of 20 answers
it_user628053 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 4, 2018
Hi Jon, I can help out. We at best can use a conference call to discuss this if you agree. My contact details are: - info@nero-advies.nl; - +31 6 28 570 870 I am lcoated in the Netherlands and the CET timezone. I have over 5 years'of experience and knowledge in detail on iPaaS, API Management, API Gateways and ESBs and are currently advising and implementing it at top 5 global brands and local Dutch market leaders. Cheers, Markus.
it_user660567 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 4, 2018
Talend platform can help with this. since integration is key in this aspect, you need to be able to a) connect with ease and without limitation and b) scale your platform as the requirements grows without being limited by costs and excessive systems requirements, and finally C) improving productivity through the reuse of what you've already created. Talend offers a modular approach to their platform, you scale this depending on your requirement so you only pay for what you need. The modules available are form open source to enterprise Data integration, data quality, ESB, MDM, real time big data, metadata manager, API manager RESTLET, self service applications: Data preparation and data stewardship. connectivity is a major point since 900+ connectors are available out of the box and more are available from the open source community, alongside API and JDBC type approach. ease of use: Visual UI that uses a drag and drop approach, Source systems on the left, target systems on the right- from there you practically draw your integration job. Talend admin Console: a single console to govern all talend modules, allows for scheduling, automation, access to shared repository, monitoring and managing deployments etc. developer cooperations, code reusability, impact analysis, governance rules, etc Code Reusability: Talend offers a native code generator, where development can start off in (eg. Java and when required can later be generated in Spark, Mapreduce, or storm or any other code. this element is also available with regards to the repository since you can access code already created( as long as governance rules permit) commercial factor: talend price is based on the number of talend developers: so in your case, you'll only need to think about one or two developer licenses. in fact with less than 25k , you can have an annual subscription of a hybrid talend cloud integration platform, giving access to Data Integration, Data quality, Bigdata with multiple remote and cloud engines included. There is no charge for the amount of data you use, and all connectors and support is out of the box. Infact, if you wanted, you can actually start integrating your systems using the open source tool: Talend Open studio for data integration and when you're ready, you can upgrade and migrate to enterprise without losing any of the work you've done on the open source tool.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Healthcare Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Dell Boomi AtomSphere?
I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools. The tool you would pick depen...
What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jitterbit Harmony Platform?
The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with Jitterbit Harmony Platform?
The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
 

Also Known As

Boomi
Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.