We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"It has been a stable product."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
