Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
2,176 views|1,510 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,919 views|2,787 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The platform is user-friendly.""The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business.""It is easy to learn and implement.""This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently.""Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable.""Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems.""I like the tool's optimization feature.""The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

More Boomi iPaaS Pros →

"The product has efficient connectors.""Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task.""The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services.""I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code.""We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable.""I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics.""Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets.""Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year.""There should be more scripting possibilities.""The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors.""They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage.""The product's UI could be more convenient.""The product could be a little bit more user-friendly.""In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."

More Boomi iPaaS Cons →

"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases.""The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning.""It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services.""The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people.""The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old.""The solution should include more connectors.""The pricing could be improved.""We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
  • "They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
  • "The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
  • "This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
  • "The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
  • "When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
  • "The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • "Approximately 20k annually."
  • More Boomi iPaaS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools.  The tool you would pick depends… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for… more »
    Top Answer:Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
    Top Answer:In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution. A few of my projects got delayed because of the charges. The pricing depends on whether an organization can handle all the costs… more »
    Top Answer:The solution should include more connectors. In one of my projects, we faced issues with SAP connectivity. The connector needed to connect the SAP was not compatible with our architecture. We had to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,176
    Comparisons
    1,510
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    397
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    5,919
    Comparisons
    2,787
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.