We performed a comparison between Cisco Cloud Services Router and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"AWS has a reference architecture to enable the Cisco routers in high availability and Transit VPC. This is a very powerful router and can enable us to use Transit VPC in AWS, and this is a very powerful feature that we use."
"The most valuable feature is the SNMP traps that I use to monitor the router and the availability of the network."
"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."
"The most important feature is that it is designed for mobile vehicle communication in harsh conditions."
"It integrates well with the other products we're using. We have it with multiple windows like Palo Alto, Arista and it easily integrated with them."
"It allowed us to create a more secure VPN than we would have been able to do without it."
"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Cloud Services Router is it can make your migrations smooth. For example, if you want to migrate to the cloud, but you don't want to change the IP. You can extend your VLAN from on-premise to the cloud without having to change the IP."
"It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We never had any issues."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"It is very stable and scalable."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"It's one of the more stable routers."
"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The initial setup is easy for one device but is more complex when numerous devices need to be configured."
"It does the job, but it's not cloud native. It could be even better, like having a single pane of glass and being less expensive."
"If you lose connectivity to the cloud, it is difficult to establish connectivity between hub and spoke."
"I would like to see better security, where there are more access controls and data confidentiality."
"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."
"Cisco Cloud Services Router could improve the GUI."
"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."
"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."
"There are areas for improvement in Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. One aspect that could be enhanced is the pricing; many clients acknowledge the quality of Juniper switches but find the pricing challenging, especially when compared to competitors like Huawei. Additionally, from a feature perspective, there's a desire for improved clarity and ease of configuration in Juniper switches. Some users find it difficult to understand and configure certain aspects, necessitating the use of external tools. This complexity, especially for Internet service providers, can be a barrier. Addressing these concerns could further strengthen the position of Juniper switches in the market."
"The solution needs to offer SDN features."
"The integration could be better."
"Juniper must publish more information about Juniper MX Series Routers."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"The documentation needs to be updated to reflect the changes made in the latest update."
Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 8th in Routers with 17 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 8.0, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "Useful for smooth migrations, high availability, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.