We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS Security and Fortinet FortiManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."I like Fortinet's cloud management. It allows me to manage all my devices in different branches for three cloud accounts. Even though I use on-prem devices, I can manage everything on the cloud."
"The pricing is excellent. It's much less expensive than Cisco."
"This solution has solid UTM features combined with a nice GUI."
"It is simple to manage, and there are a lot of functionalities in the same box."
"It's quite comfortable to handle the FortiGate firewall."
"It's super reliable. I don't think I've ever had a reliability issue with it."
"Fortinet FortiGate is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of the solution are SD-WAN, filtering testing applications, web filtering, and the new VPN."
"What I have used the most and received the most benefit from is the IPsec technology."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The stability of this solution is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco IOS Security is posturing."
"Cisco is head-and-shoulders above all of the competition when it comes to technical support."
"The product has valuable features for business intelligence."
"Cisco IOS Security has many good features, but compared to other solutions, it has a more user-friendly interface with steps to apply and manage rules. Another good part of the solution is that it's more straightforward."
"The product is easy to use."
"Without FortiManager, you cannot manage a complex environment across several sites with multiple firewalls."
"For the whole security fabric from Fortinet, with a simple click you can see if some workstations or services are affected by an attack. You can really easily quarantine it, check the solution, and fix it."
"The product is a combination of management and monitoring from the same interface."
"It's very easy to install, and it's easy to discover and communicate with your device."
"Fortinet FortiManager allows you to manage multiple FortiGate devices from a single console, and this is a valuable product feature."
"The central management feature is the most valuable to me."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiManager are the overall management it provides and its ease of use."
"It is easy to manage a huge number of devices with FortiManager."
"There are some license issues. Not every feature must have a separate license. There must be some of kind synergy between the license so we don't have to pay for every individual license that we would like to have."
"They need faster serviceability and more security features."
"The solution could be more evenly structured."
"The security of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."
"Its filtering is sometimes too precise or strict. We sometimes have to bypass and authorize some of the sites, but they get blocked. We know that they are trusted sites, but they are blocked, and we don't know why."
"It would be nice if backups could more easily migrate between different models."
"The main aspect of FortiGate that could be improved is load balancing. Our management team does not want to buy another appliance for only load balancing."
"Bandwidth usage in reporting could be improved for Fortinet FortiGate."
"The routers, don't have like long-term tendency features, or higher availability features available for the IOS. It could also use a better user interface."
"There's a technology called SD-WAN that we would like to see. We are unable to handle multiple connections or to automatically load balance. I would like to have a feature that enables us to automatically prepare for load balancing."
"There could be a bit more functions on offer that could make it easier to use."
"The solution is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"Cisco IOS Security could improve by having more compatibility with other Cisco solutions."
"With respect to user-friendliness, it is a command-line interface and those with such experience will get along just fine, whereas others may struggle."
"The solution is not user friendly and it is hard to manage the GUI interface."
"In the next release of this solution, we would like to see support for the 100BT and 7000 models."
"I would like to be able to manage other products such as Endpoint and FortiAnalyzer through FortiManager. That is, the integration with other solutions needs to be improved."
"This solution needs more experienced technical support staff. There's nothing special about it compared to other vendors."
"We have experienced a series of minor bugs that necessitated contacted technical support on several occasions."
"Pricing-wise, it could always be less, even though it is less expensive than Palo Alto."
"Having FortiManager work with all of the Fortinet products would be a good improvement."
"We have some visibility issues with the reporting."
"FortiManager would be improved by putting everything into a single console, including Microsoft O365 integration."
"The GUI could be updated. It's not as good as it could be and is something the solution should improve in an upcoming release."
Cisco IOS Security is ranked 22nd in Firewalls with 47 reviews while Fortinet FortiManager is ranked 3rd in Network Management Applications with 61 reviews. Cisco IOS Security is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS Security writes "User-friendly and excels in documentation, making it easier to resolve issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiManager writes "Easy to set up with good integration capabilities but we've had troubles when moving devices". Cisco IOS Security is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Meraki MX, Fortinet FortiOS, Netgate pfSense and OPNsense, whereas Fortinet FortiManager is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Fortinet FortiOS, Cisco DNA Center, Zabbix and AlgoSec.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
