We compared Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Huawei Wireless is praised for its connectivity, performance, design, and battery life, with a focus on customer service and deployment times. D-Link Wireless highlights fast and reliable connectivity, range, and security features, with positive feedback on customer service and pricing. Huawei could improve signal strength and device compatibility, while D-Link could enhance connectivity and setup simplicity.
Features: Huawei Wireless stands out for its efficient performance, reliable signal strength, and user-friendly interface. It also offers a sleek design, extensive coverage range, long battery life, and advanced security features. In comparison, D-Link Wireless excels in fast and reliable connectivity, excellent range, strong signal strength, easy setup process, strong security features, and compatibility with various devices.
Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is praised for its reasonable and competitive pricing. Its setup cost is regarded as straightforward and hassle-free, ensuring a smooth installation process. Users appreciate the easily obtained and flexible licensing options. In contrast, D-Link Wireless is also considered reasonable and affordable in terms of pricing and setup cost, but user reviews do not explicitly mention its licensing aspect., Huawei Wireless has been shown to contribute positively to ROI, according to user feedback. Meanwhile, users express satisfaction with D-Link Wireless, highlighting its reliable performance and versatility.
Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless could improve its signal strength, compatibility with devices, user interface, durability, and longevity based on user feedback. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless could benefit from enhancements in connectivity, speed, range, signal stability, and simpler setup and configuration processes, according to user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on Huawei Wireless suggests varying durations for deployment and setup, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, D-Link Wireless had users mentioning a three-month deployment and a week for setup, but it is noted that sometimes these terms can refer to the same period., The customer service and support for Huawei Wireless are highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and expertise. Users have reported a professional and efficient experience. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless also receives praise for their responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful customer service, with users reporting positive experiences and satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is very secure."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"D-Link Wireless is a tool that is used since it is an easy and user-friendly product."
"This product is user-friendly and we can manage it as per the requirements of the user."
"The solution is extremely easy to install. You just add them and in a few clicks, they are ready to go."
"The setup process is very easy."
"The initial setup process was easy."
"The tool supports new technologies."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use."
"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."
"All of the features are valuable in Huawei Wireless."
"The best feature of Huawei Wireless is the quick and fast setup."
"The solution has high performance and we are using Wi-Fi 6 that we have found to be the best coverage."
"Installation is easy."
"From an implementation perspective, it's easy. I rate it a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup, and ten is an easy setup."
"I think it's a good technology. I like that it transparently connects with LDAP. The technology has a lot of capacity for WiFi six. It provides notifications, and there are many ways to connect with fiber. There is an electrical tool, and you can put an SFP transceiver. There are also many ways to implement antennas."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"The price could be better."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Sometimes we configure the SSID with a password but the same AP shows two WiFi connections with the same SSID name (one is protected by a password and another one give access without a password)."
"The cloud managed solution needs improvement, and they should focus on the SD-WAN segment with regard to integration."
"In future, it would also be good to have a switch within D Link that works as well as the Cisco 9200 Switch."
"It would definitely help if we had more advanced features for distributing bandwidth."
"D-Link has some catching up to do in terms of advancing and improving its technology."
"The performance offered by D-Link Wireless can be a bit problematic at times, owing to which it is an area that can be considered for improvement."
"The solution's performance could be improved."
"The only issue is with the controller visibility of the devices connecting to the network."
"The speed could be a bit better."
"The solution needs to include a captive portal."
"Huawei Wireless can improve the signal, sometimes it becomes weak."
"While technically proficient, enhancing communication skills would greatly benefit the customer experience."
"The scalability could be better."
"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."
"The demo program is an area for improvement in Huawei Wireless as it's hard to use. As a partner, you can use the solution for free, for thirty days, for example. On paper, everything looks fine, but you have to get permission and explain why you want to download the software, even if it's just for demo purposes. I don't get why I have to do this as a partner and still give an explanation that this would be for a demo setup. Downloading the solution isn't a click-and-install process that should go smoothly and efficiently. You have to get a lot of approvals and explain a lot, and in the end, you find out that you received the approval for one piece of software. It looks like you need additional software to use the software. My company asked for approval and received the approval three days later, but you need to install another software to use some of the features. In the past, most features were separate. Because Huawei wants a single pane of glass where all features should work with the Huawei equipment, Huawei decided to combine everything into the iMaster NCE Campus, which incorporates every other cloud solution. However, you still have to ask for approval for every piece of software, and without clear information on the features, the type of software, and the software files required, it's not so good from my point of view."
"What needs improvement in Huawei Wireless is after-sales support. I've faced many after-sales support issues, so that's the area I want Huawei to improve. Having an SLA with customers is what I'd suggest to Huawei Wireless."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
D-Link Wireless is ranked 11th in Wireless LAN with 15 reviews while Huawei Wireless is ranked 9th in Wireless LAN with 33 reviews. D-Link Wireless is rated 8.0, while Huawei Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of D-Link Wireless writes "Highly reliable, provides wireless access to resources, and supports new technologies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Wireless writes "Customizable and has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, and smart antennas". D-Link Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Omada Access Points, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Huawei Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Ruckus Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our D-Link Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
