We compared Elastic Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, users appreciate both Elastic Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for their comprehensive threat protection, user-friendly interfaces, and effective incident response capabilities. Elastic Security stands out for its strong threat hunting functionalities and log management, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is praised for its efficient system management and reporting. Elastic Security users value its affordability and flexible licensing, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users highlight its reasonable pricing and seamless integration with other Microsoft products. However, Elastic Security users feel it could improve its threat monitoring capabilities and incident response system, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users suggest areas for enhancement such as easier navigation and improved integration with other security tools.
Features: Elastic Security is valued for its strong threat hunting functionalities, efficient log management, and seamless integration with other Elastic solutions. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is praised for its real-time monitoring and detection, efficient system management and reporting, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Elastic Security is regarded positively by users, who appreciate its minimal associated costs and hassle-free experience. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is also praised for its reasonable pricing, straightforward setup process, and flexible licensing options., Elastic Security's positive ROI is attributed to its tangible benefits and delivered results, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's success lies in its performance, effectiveness, ease of use, and real-time insights.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Security product has room for improvement in its threat monitoring capabilities, incident response system, integration with other security tools, navigation, user interface, and customizable features. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also has areas that could be enhanced.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on the duration to establish a new tech solution for Elastic Security varies, with users having different timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation phases. In contrast, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also has mixed feedback, with some users spending longer on deployment compared to others who completed both deployment and setup within a week. Looking at the context of the terms used is crucial., Customers have found Elastic Security's customer service to be helpful and supportive, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is praised for its efficiency, promptness, and ability to address concerns.
The summary above is based on 114 interviews we conducted recently with Elastic Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning capability."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it is more flexible than AlienVault."
"It's simple and easy to use."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"Elastic has a lot of beats, such as Winlogbeat and Filebeat. Beats are the agents that have to be installed on the terminals to send the data. When we install beats or Elastic agents on every terminal, they don't overload the terminals. In other SIEM solutions such as Splunk or QRadar, when beats or agents are installed on endpoints, they are very heavy for the terminals. They consume a lot of power of the terminals, whereas Elastic agents hardly consume any power and don't overload the terminals."
"It is the best open-source product for people working in SO, managing and analyzing logs."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is free and part of the licensing stack of other Microsoft products."
"Microsoft Defender is always running. It is doing its job, so it is fine. I don't have any issues with the way it was implemented or how we are running it. We have been upgrading IT throughout the years, but there have been no issues."
"I like the fact that it has the ransomware solution in there. I'm glad that the ransomware solution is built into it. That's probably the biggest thing that I see in Microsoft Defender."
"The whole bundle of the product, which is similar to other Microsoft products, is valuable. Ten years ago, you had third-party stuff for different things. You had one solution for email archiving and another third-party one for something else. Nowadays, Microsoft Office covers all the stuff that was formerly covered by third-party solutions. It is the same with antivirus. The functionality is just basic. You have the scanning, and then you also have a kind of cloud-based protection and reporting about your environment. With Microsoft Security Center, you have a complete overview of your environment. You know the software inventory, and you have security recommendations. You can not only see that the antivirus is up to date; you can also see where are the vulnerabilities in your system. Microsoft Security Center tells you where you have old, deprecated software and what kind of CVEs are addressed. It's really cool stuff."
"The best thing I like about it is its interaction with the other Defender products. It provides the ability to push telemetry up. It gives me endpoint visibility and allows me to take automated actions."
"We have just started to implement it. It is useful for protection from malware and ransomware."
"The best feature is the fact that for certain mobiles you can control your corporate profiles versus your personal profiles. That is amazingly important. Apple just supported the separation of corporate and personal profiles, whereas Android has been doing that for quite some time... Because Android supports that, if an Android phone is lost or stolen, I can wipe out all the corporate-related information from that phone and not touch the personal side. I can separate the apps and I can separate the ability to cut and paste between apps."
"The detection features are valuable, as is the fact that it is easier to port these logs into Sentinel. That is also useful for us. It is more comprehensive."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The support needs improvement."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"We'd like better premium support."
"The setup process is complex. You need a solid working knowledge of networking, operating systems, and a little programming."
"There should be a simulation environment to check whether my Elastic implementation is functioning perfectly fine. Other solutions have their own Android and iOS applications that I can install on my mobile so that I am continuously connected to the SIEM."
"The solution could offer better reporting features."
"We'd like to see some more artificial intelligence capabilities."
"I would like more ways to manage permissions and restrict access to certain users."
"We set up a cron job to delete old logs so that we wouldn't hit a disk space issue. Such a feature should be available in the UI, where old logs can be deleted automatically. (Don’t know if this feature is already there)."
"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is secure but when it comes to security all solutions could improve security."
"It can get a bit laggy sometimes. Other than that, we don't have any issues. They constantly tweak it and fix it up based on users' feedback. It has improved a lot over the past four years. Defender for Endpoint never really used to be a good endpoint security solution, but over the past couple of years, Microsoft has invested heavily in it. So, it has come a long way in all aspects of endpoint security. If they want to make it better, they should just continue investing in the current path of what they've been doing over the past couple of years."
"Microsoft should improve support for third-party platforms, because not all functionality is available for all of them. It's a good product, but they should just extend the functionality for all platforms."
"Sometimes, there are different skews. In a basic skew, they should have basic log analysis without the need to integrate with any third-party or SIEM solutions, like Sentinel. This would make it so much easier for users who don't have log collection or log analysis."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration."
"In active mode, it's great that it gives you so much information, but it does record every keystroke so you have a lot of logs... that amount of data logging started to add up in the cost."
"There is room to improve the security of the solution."
"Windows Firewall is integrated with Windows Defender. Over the last few days, I have had a problem with defining a wildcard on Windows Firewall. For example, I wanted to pull out the connection of my program and install a software package with a lot of executable files. I wanted to prevent it from accessing the internet. I could not select executables by using a wildcard. I had to select a single executable with its full name."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 16th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 59 reviews while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 182 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Intune. See our Elastic Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
