We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Logpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The product is easy to use."
"They basically charge you in a better way."
"The solution offers excellent reporting features. Our customers have been satisfied that they have been able to meet their compliance needs by giving them a standard report."
"It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. LogPoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parseable because all logs are not the same, but with LogPoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them."
"The flexibility of the search feature and the solution's analytics features are the most valuable parts of the solution."
"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."
"The most beneficial was being able to prove, with proper reports, that from a compliance perspective, the company is in control. The service part of LogPoint did modifications or did some additional work to have the proper reports defined."
"The search feature is valuable. The dashboards are also valuable for our bosses. Another valuable feature, which is the main feature of the product, is the centralization of all the logs."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"Sometimes, the product is not stable."
"Logpoint is not flexible. Its documentation is not user-friendly."
"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."
"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."
"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."
"Dashboards could be developed further."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Logpoint is ranked 29th in Log Management with 20 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel and SolarWinds Security Event Manager .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.