We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and LogPoint based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Elastic Security is commended for its adaptability, extensive customization options, and seamless integration with the ELK Stack. LogPoint is noted for its advanced technology and extensive log-collection, parsing, and analysis mechanisms. Elastic Security could improve by reducing resource usage, automating threat response, and simplifying the user experience. LogPoint can improve its dashboard customization, resource efficiency, network hierarchy diagrams, and agent deployment.
Service and Support: Some Elastic Security users found their support helpful, while others experienced difficulties and delays. LogPoint's customer service receives high marks for its exceptional technical support and responsive engineers, but some users reported delays in receiving help from higher-level support.
Ease of Deployment: Elastic Security generally has a straightforward setup but may require trained specialists. The complexity of LogPoint's initial setup can range from complex and time-consuming to fast and easy, depending on the user's experience and the organization’s size.
Pricing: Elastic Security is considered affordable and cost-effective, with pricing based on the size of the monitored environment. LogPoint's fixed pricing model is seen as cost-effective and competitive.
ROI: Elastic Security has shown mixed results in terms of ROI, with some users expressing concerns about the quality of their premium support. LogPoint makes costs more predictable and enables companies to generate revenue through security operation services.
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The most valuable feature for me is Discover."
"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."
"The visualization is very good."
"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning capability."
"It's very customizable, which is quite helpful."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"Elastic has a lot of beats, such as Winlogbeat and Filebeat. Beats are the agents that have to be installed on the terminals to send the data. When we install beats or Elastic agents on every terminal, they don't overload the terminals. In other SIEM solutions such as Splunk or QRadar, when beats or agents are installed on endpoints, they are very heavy for the terminals. They consume a lot of power of the terminals, whereas Elastic agents hardly consume any power and don't overload the terminals."
"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."
"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."
"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."
"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."
"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Detections could be improved."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Email notification should be done the same way as Logentries does it."
"Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language."
"I think because we are a cybersecurity company, the thing that can be improved is the prebuilt tools, especially quality. Compared to its competitor, they still have fewer prebuilt security rules. Elastic Security, in terms of generating alerts, cannot group the same products into one another. Even though the alerts are the same, they still generate them one by one. So, it is very noisy in our dashboard. I would like the Elastic Security admin to group all the same alarms into one alarm so that our dashboard is not noisy."
"Elastic has one problem. In the past, Elastic Security was free. Now, they currently only offer the basic license or a certain period of time."
"The tool should improve its scalability."
"Upgrades currently released as stacks when it should be a plugin or an extension to save removal and reinstallation."
"With Elastic, you have to build the use cases for the specific requirement. Other products have a simple integration and more use cases to integrate out-of-the-box solutions for SIEM."
"If the documentation were improved and made more clear for beginners, or even professionals, then we would be more attracted to this solution."
"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature. It would be nice if it was in with the standard products."
"The solution should offer more integrations and third-party solutions like incident response platforms or allow access to third-party big data"
"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."
"Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."
"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."
"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 59 reviews while Logpoint is ranked 26th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 20 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM. See our Elastic Security vs. Logpoint report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors, best Log Management vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.