We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP Business One on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like most about Google Cloud is its stability. I also like that its GUI works fine for my company."
"It's easy to deploy next-generation applications on Google Cloud. Customers can also use various cloud tools to optimize their operations and generate more insights to do business much smarter."
"It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage."
"Google Cloud's most valuable features are its performance and ease of access."
"I like that it is simple to use."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Technical support has been good."
"I like the simple features that allow me to share documents with others."
"The way we can make changes in new fields, or make new rules with our IT department, has been very useful."
"The top-level view and easy navigation to individual transaction levels are beautifully done in SAP Business One."
"I believe the solution is very stable."
"The initial setup of the product seems to be good."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product makes it easier to overview the ERP system and manufacturing processes through different modules."
"Setting up Business One is straightforward. It took us about three months to deploy Business One on AWS."
"The maintenance is a significant advantage as it is supported by the international community rather than the local community."
"The solution could be a bit cheaper."
"Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible."
"Security features could be improved."
"I would like to see an increase in storage with Google Cloud."
"Monitoring and usage reporting could be improved."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"I would like to see more code generation features that enable you to take user input in simple English and automatically convert it to code."
"I find it hard to download items, especially on their operating system."
"SAP Business One on AWS could improve by adding more functionality to the web client."
"The interface needs to be improved. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"The tool's cost is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The AI tools, programming languages, and dashboard customization should be easier."
"The reporting can be improved. Also, it is an expensive solution, and you need consultants for new interfaces as it's very rigid otherwise."
"I feel that these vendors must be well trained so that they can deploy this solution."
"Not a ten because it's not software for a structured company or something very big. That is my impression."
"It would be better if the solution was on a cloud infrastructure."
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP Business One on AWS is ranked 5th in Cloud ERP with 23 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP Business One on AWS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business One on AWS writes " A highly stable product with great technical support specifically designed for small and medium enterprises". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Red Hat OpenShift, whereas SAP Business One on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, NetSuite ERP, SAP Business ByDesign and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Google Cloud vs. SAP Business One on AWS report.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.