HPE OneView vs New Relic comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
New Relic
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
152
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (3rd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the market share of HPE OneView is 1.4% and it decreased by 26.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of New Relic is 4.5% and it decreased by 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
7.1%
Network Monitoring Software
2.3%
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Eldawody Elsayed - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2023
A tool with an easy initial setup phase that ensures its users benefit in the form of a return on investment
I use HPE OneView HPE OneView to manage Synergy Switches in my company With HPE OneView, you can monitor a number of servers multiple times to see if they are stable. The most valuable feature of the solution is the visibility it provides when one adds any other servers externally to it. The…
Shuaib Gill - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 10, 2022
reliable with good monitoring and the capability to expand
One of the metrics is total time. I would like to see the true response time of a particular call. It might say top five slowest calls. However, I don't know how they're calculating it. Maybe if they could have documentation for how those things are calculated, that would be a lot easier. If they say the top five slowest methods and the slowest one is three seconds, yet we know that there's a process that's taking ten seconds, it can be kind of confusing. If they could add in their help files, how these columns are calculated, that would make it more transparent. They need to clarify: What does it mean, total time? And how do they calculate the total time? How do they calculate average time? How do they calculate the top five slowest? What is it actually pulling? I would like to see them introduce integration with LoadRunner; that's a bit easier.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​The stability is very good. I have never had an issue with it over the three years that I have been using it."
"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"It monitors all our servers, and if there is any problem it straight away sends us an alert. If It's a faulty component, we can see it from there. It sends an alert."
"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."
"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good.​"
"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use."
"End-user Synthetics and monitoring are very good."
"It allows the restriction of privileges and control of users."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is the dashboard, New Relic Insights. I configured my own dashboard to monitor certain parameters."
"It is stable and scalable."
 

Cons

"The tool doesn't send automated alerts via email...We should be able to receive notification emails when a server or hardware issue arises, which would be helpful if someone is unavailable in the office."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
"​I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits.​"
"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."
"​There was a feature called HPE cloud manager, but now it is owned by Micro Focus. HPE should make a cloud optimizer again."
"The solution needs to have staging."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."
"The product has good documentation for Linux, however, their documentation for Windows is lacking substantially. It's something they need to develop."
"I would like the ability to set up certain dummy accounts and do the actual things that the customer is doing, without impacting the production environment."
"The UX/UI design of New Relic APM could be improved. The solution currently has some slow pages in terms of loading and viewing the pages, for example, the reports. The reports and other pages take a long time to load."
"We have had issues with our agents going offline."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."
"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."
"HPE could lower the price."
"​I am happy with the price."
"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."
"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."
"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."
"​Use it. It is free."
"The price was one of the reasons we chose this solution."
"I think it's overpriced for the technical support that we get. We spent over 1,00,000 USD a year."
"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."
"Cost is significant with a lot of extras."
"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy. The product is easy to deploy and manage, which is why our company purchased through the AWS Marketplace."
"The pricing and licensing are good if you have an account manager and a partner manager who are looking to help out."
"The new licensing model is great, as we pay for what we use (in computational units). However, the pricing is expensive compared to other tools."
"The price depends on how many agents you want."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE OneView?
The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.
What needs improvement with HPE OneView?
HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy. It would be good if we could incorporate HPE OneView into GreenLake. Instead of having everything go to HPE G...
What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?
HPE OneView is a management interface to manage hardware in a VMware environment. It is used for managing different servers and pushing out the firmware and operating software. I use HPE OneView fo...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What do you like most about New Relic?
It allows the restriction of privileges and control of users.
What needs improvement with New Relic?
The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises. Therefore, they should assess supporting the licensing on-premises as well.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

HP OneView
New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil
World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. New Relic and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.