We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"...Intune itself integrates with that entire Microsoft ecosystem. As an individual product itself, it's okay. It holds up. But when you start saying "I've bought this as part of a wider solution, as a company we are going Microsoft throughout," then it makes more sense to have Microsoft Intune... so you have that single dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The Autopilot feature is fantastic. It is a Microsoft product, so it deals best with Microsoft operating systems, but it can integrate with iOS, Mac OS, Linux, and Android."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"My customers value the ability to control all their devices from a central point in IBM MaaS360."
"The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"It is a stable solution that functions twenty-four hours and seven days a week."
"The tool's most valuable features are application, distribution, and security. It helps to block user access."
"The most valuable features are mobile device management and security (which allows you to quarantine infected devices)."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"Technical support is not that great."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"It should be simplified. I've worked with many different mobile device management solutions, and Intune is one of the more complex ones. It could be more simplified, and some of it is related to the wording that is being used, such as a configuration profile versus a policy. They really should have had different names to make it less confusing."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"A new Intune feature allows application packaging, but it incurs additional licensing costs for a significant number of applications."
"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."
"It doesn't economize when you scale up. We have over 14,000 employees, and we have between 7,500 and 8,000 city-owned or personal devices being used to conduct city business. Its price can be improved. It is not a cheap solution."
"An area for improvement would be handshaking with Microsoft in terms of trying to get a DLP on Microsoft OS."
"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."
"When we have MaaS360 installed on smartphones, it consumes the battery of the device at a much faster pace. This is one of the areas of improvement that I would like to highlight. We have also observed that in the contact list, a lot of duplication is happening. A single contact is duplicated three or four times, which also consumes more memory resources. If they can work on improving it for these aspects, it will have a more positive impact not only on the way the application is being consumed by the user but also on user satisfaction. A lot of new features are being deployed or rolled out by companies that are competitors of IBM MaaS360. IBM will have to ensure that all those features are on board so that we have a complete suite of features in the platform, rather than deploying multiple diverse solutions to cater to the requirements of our customers."
"IBM MaaS360 can improve the location reporter. There is a 15-minute delay and this does not allow for any usefulness."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"The user experience really isn't so good."
"It's difficult for someone like me to set up a phone that doesn't require a SIM card, like Apple's new phones."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and JumpCloud, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, SOTI MobiControl and VMware Workspace ONE.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.