We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"The most valuable features are DDoS protection."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"DDoS protection and WAF are the most valuable features. It is easy to deploy a service. It is easy and quick to deploy to a new website."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"An improvement has been to our website: It increases the speed of our response, the capacity of the site, and optimizes the bandwidth."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved."
"Incapsula services also provides load balancing services for their service IP address environment. So far, with monitoring their services, the IP address was only changed once."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF and F5 Advanced WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.