We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Symantec Client Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Client Desktop Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"We use the product to know about our assets and manage remote support."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"Well, what we like is that it catch actually a lot of features constantly upgrading. So all the three maybe there there were some features as the tenant on the earliest version. Now it's it's almost everything that we we need. So managing security ManageEngine configuration. It's we are very satisfied because it has the Telstra that's what we we need."
"The most important feature we found to be useful in the COVID situation is the secure connection, which gives the IT support staff the ability to seamlessly connect with the users remotely and in a secure way."
"The mobile functionality is very easy."
"The centralized control of all of our Windows hardware that this solution offers has been most valuable to our organization."
"We can scale the product."
"The most important thing for us is that it is very easy to use, as well as the availability of it in our support centers."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Client Management Suite is the ease of client management and agent installation."
"We can track the incidents, we can track the changes, we can track the assets from cradle to grave and give some kind of accounting as they get older."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
"The solution is expensive."
"The product must provide more API integrations with different ERP tools."
"Compared to the solution we use to manage our Mac products, this solution lacks the ability to create dynamic groups. We would like the ability, for example, for machines which have been upgraded to form part of a grouping based on this upgrade."
"I would like to see them include the ability to find out the network usage but I believe that might be a feature of it already."
"Documentation could improve so we don't need to create the support requests first."
"The support could be faster."
"The solution lacks some configuration."
"The technical support is in need of improvement."
"Some parts are working okay, some of the other components aren't. Workflow isn't working properly. Different people accepting changes and being able to close it has some issues. Putting hot fixes and installing it usually breaks the system."
"Symantec Client Management Suite can improve by adding more network devices."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Client Management Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 1st in Client Desktop Management with 60 reviews while Symantec Client Management Suite is ranked 2nd in Client Desktop Management with 3 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Symantec Client Management Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Client Management Suite writes "Knowledgeable support, easy client management, and straightforward agent installation". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro and Sophos Mobile, whereas Symantec Client Management Suite is most compared with Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Configuration Manager. See our ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Symantec Client Management Suite report.
See our list of best Client Desktop Management vendors.
We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.