Mendix vs ServiceNow Now Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Mendix
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
5th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (2nd)
ServiceNow Now Platform
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
11th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No-Code Development Platforms (3rd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the market share of Mendix is 7.8% and it decreased by 22.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of ServiceNow Now Platform is 1.4% and it decreased by 22.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
Unique Categories:
Mobile Development Platforms
23.8%
Low-Code Development Platforms
10.1%
No-Code Development Platforms
28.8%
 

Featured Reviews

MinhTran2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
Useful for quick application building across multiple industries
My team has ten developers, and for one solution, we require three to five developers. Mendix is useful for various industries, such as retail, e-commerce, and banking. For example, we're currently using the solution for a payment app for retail. It can also be used to create a mobile banking app. Mendix is a low-code platform, which means that it allows us to build applications quickly and with less coding. It also has various pre-built components and integrations, which can speed up the development process. Furthermore, one of my team members has Mendix certification and uses it for marketing and sales purposes. The team is learning about how Mendix can be used for queries, which are currently at an intermediate level. Additionally, I have completed 55 queries in Mendix.
Navin Jacob - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
Offers ability to create custom workflows and the platform gives us a single view of where we need to optimize
Currently, it's very technologically complex and requires IT specialists to fully understand the platform's potential. The user experience and usage perspective should be simplified for wider adoption, especially in smaller organizations. So, simplifying the user interface for both users and administrators is key. It is not very intuitive. In my experience, learning the tool takes months. Even then, it often requires a few years of on-the-job experience before users become fully comfortable. Newer tools on the market address the complexity issue ServiceNow faces, as its legacy base can be a limitation. Also, pricing can be a barrier for smaller organizations. With the rapid advancements in cloud-based technologies, particularly generative AI, ServiceNow may need to revisit its pricing to stay competitive.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I found most valuable in Mendix is that it's very much suitable for mobile apps such as native Android or IOS supported mobile apps. The multiple features of the platform are very, very attractive and very popular. Mendix has technical features such as microflows and nanoflows. You can also access data models in the platform. These are the features that are very, very strong in Mendix. I got my hands dirty on other low-code platforms, but I have not seen such strong features in them compared to the microflows, nanoflows, and data model access that are in Mendix, including creating and integration. The platform has out-of-the-box adapters or out-of-the-box-connectors that you can integrate with different interface applications such as SAP, Salesforce, Oracle EBS, etc."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution is stable."
"It is low code, where the developers can still develop in Java. That to us is very appealing."
"The development environment is model-driven. We can use the information from this for our business engineers to make the information models, and they can also execute the model."
"We also use Mendix Enterprise Integration for complex business logic. It's a low-code platform, so we run Mendix in the Mendix Cloud."
"Mendix has made a great deal of effort to provide its developers a healthy, modern environment for developing. First of all, it adopts Agile methodology by creating a SCRUM-based app where you can handle your user stories. Next comes version control, which really allows multiple team members to collaborate quite easily. And last but not least, Mendix modeler, which is your IDE for developing Mendix apps."
"What I like best about Mendix is that it's leading the way for low-code, no-code platforms compared to other solutions in the market."
"The tool is generally easy to use, making it a very user-friendly product."
"What I like most about the ServiceNow Now Platform is the flexibility of using JavaScript. I also like that the platform allows custom scripting, server-side scripting, and client-side scripting. Another valuable feature in the ServiceNow Now Platform is the Flow Designer which allows dragging and dropping code, and low code activities."
"The simplicity is great."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The integration feature has simplified our multi-tool ecosystem. The inbuilt integrations significantly improve our solution delivery timelines. Also, standardized adapters and integration adapters reduce failure rates due to compatibility. This boosts productivity and eases maintenance."
"At this point, over and above what ServiceNow actually is, the key is that it's really nothing but a web service. Whether it's a form or anything, the best part is that you can easily leverage anything of ServiceNow for any application anywhere just by calling the REST endpoints and handling the request messages."
"The incident management has been the most useful feature for us."
"ITOM Discovery is a great feature."
 

Cons

"It needs to provide an overview of model versioning control for the sake of the review process; better SCRUM board; an overview of model changes from the repository through Sprintr (SCRUM board). Also, a choice between versioning control system would be nice."
"Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++."
"There is always a layer of custom code required."
"The code refactoring tools could be better, especially for applications running for years. It's not bad, but it could be smoother. Also, writing new widgets can be trickier than it should be for some people, but not if you're familiar with Mendix."
"I would also like to see automatic adjustment to the Java Heap, whenever an application load becomes too much for the application. It could also use hot database replication."
"It could use a more comprehensive widget creation studio in the IDE."
"While the documentation is good, the development box could be better."
"I struggle with solutions like Mendix in terms of creating enterprise solutions."
"The basic reporting system is rather static."
"The reporting capabilities need to be improved, otherwise we need to pay for performance analytics."
"The solution is very expensive."
"I feel that the solution's user interface is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The initial setup requires a lot of customization based on the individual company's processes."
"The price is a bit high and can be a bit of a barrier for some customers."
"ServiceNow Now Platform's technical support needs to improve."
"When it comes to integration, it can be complex compared to other tools I'm currently using."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From a commercial point of view, we would like them to change that they currently sell it as a platform, but as a customer you have to decide upfront the usage of the platform. We would like to have Mendix sell it as a pay as you go model: You pay for what you use, and you don't pay for what you don't use."
"I would not recommend the solution to small and medium-sized businesses because it’s expensive. It’s great for big organizations. I rate the pricing as a three out of ten."
"Mendix is not open source, but its license cost is cheap, particularly when compared to the Appian license. The license model would depend on how many users you have and how many applications you are creating. If you are creating a single app, you just need to have a single app license, so it's free. If you want a multiple app license to cover two thousand or three thousand users, for example, internal users or external users, then you need to pay for the license. There's also a license model for above three thousand or four thousand, or five thousand internal and external users."
"Mendix licensing cost is based on the number of apps you have on the server. At the basic level, it is free of charge, so that seems reasonable, but once you go beyond that, and when it comes to the number of users on the app, that basic structure doesn't work, and the pricing tends to get a little bit steep."
"Its cost is higher than competitors. The cost mostly includes licensing. It is charged per user. The cost model could be better. When you have a big company, what does per user mean? If I have a company where I have 40,000 people who will go to access it but only 200 do, how do you license it and who do you pay for? If they hit it once, do you pay for it? The licensing is complex for a big company. It is easy for us to buy all we can eat, get an enterprise license agreement, and call it good."
"Pricing used to be complex, but Mendix has improved that quite a bit."
"Mendix seems a bit expensive. But in terms of wanting to have less developers and higher velocity, the total cost of ownership is fine. It's not cheap, though."
"There is a license required to use Mendix. The solution's price is high, but it is best suited for enterprise companies that have the budget. It is not for small or medium-sized businesses."
"The price of the product falls on the higher side of the spectrum."
"Pricing is based on the number of users and user licenses, but the product is 20% to 30% more than the competition."
"It's expensive and if you need some analytical views of your activity, there is an additional cost."
"The solution is expensive."
"In my opinion, it is expensive. However, they do offer favorable licensing for charities, for example."
"Price-wise, I would describe the product's cost to be more than the average, but it compensates for that with the functionalities that it provides."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it a ten for pricing."
"The pricing of this solution is done annually and it is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Mendix?
We also use Mendix Enterprise Integration for complex business logic. It's a low-code platform, so we run Mendix in the Mendix Cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?
The pricing is fairly comparable. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price.
What needs improvement with Mendix?
The code refactoring tools could be better, especially for applications running for years. It's not bad, but it could be smoother. Also, writing new widgets can be trickier than it should be for so...
What do you like most about ServiceNow Now Platform?
The integration with other tools is pretty good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Now Platform?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive solution. There are other solutions in the market that might be better suited for simpler use cases.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Now Platform?
The UI is not intuitive. It was updated recently, and it has been completely flipped. Some menus are hidden within dropdowns. It was much easier to access before. The recent update has not improved...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC
experian, beachbody, health partners
Find out what your peers are saying about Mendix vs. ServiceNow Now Platform and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.