We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"The solution is excellent at figuring how to build an application in three months. It makes it very quick and easy."
"The solution works great and is stable."
"Can design apps quickly and can connect to any database."
"We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"The platform has valuable features for opportunity and finance management. It has all the essential features for customer service."
"It is good for using for small apps and automation on Office stuff."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."
"The tool is very easy to use."
"The initial setup is easy."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"It is not enough user friendly. It also doesn't integrate very well with SQL Server."
"We'd like more features and less to no coding."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see custom APIs, better integration with other solutions, and more connectors available."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not responsive in nature."
"They probably need to improve intelligent document processing."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"The flexibility of the user interface could be better."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The tool has minor bugs."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.