Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP Logo
328 views|278 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Slack Logo
2,499 views|1,079 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Jam and Slack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."

More SAP Jam Pros →

"We use thread-based communication. So that if a new person comes to look into a problem for a particular task, they can easily go and look into the particular thread it is discussed in.""It allows to facilitate communication, allowing us to create channels for updates, file sharing, and photo sharing within our team profiles.""Slack helps me to read bulk messages.""With respect to being a clean and efficient communications platform, I think that it does the job quite well.""The solution's initial setup process is easy.""I am impressed with the product's calls and screen share features which are very useful.""The product makes communication seamless.""When we work with a platform like Slack, we can have one source without merging different document versions."

More Slack Pros →

Cons
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."

More SAP Jam Cons →

"Slack's interface is not simple for me. It's not a user-friendly interface""I would like the text in chat to be more customizable.""The UI could be a little bit better.""Slack is not as strong as competitors like Teams when it comes to things like video meetings and audio meetings.""I think Slack could add additional features without making the solution slower or more difficult to use.""I would like the in-meeting content sharing facility to be improved.""Slack does not have videoconferencing capabilities, which would have been nice.""The way groups are created on slack could be improved. Once you create a group of people, you can't add additional people unless you convert it to a channel."

More Slack Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license and implementation fees."
  • More SAP Jam Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We use the free version that does not have a license."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "It is less expensive than one of its competitors."
  • "It is an expensive tool. We pay 15 to 20 USD monthly per user."
  • "Slack is definitely worth the money."
  • "The pricing can range up to about twenty bucks a user. You can spend a lot of money, especially if you're talking about thousands of users. Generally speaking, Slack is less expensive than Teams. Slack doesn't include all the bells and whistles that Teams does. So you can go from a $6 license in Microsoft 365 to a $50 license per user per month, and there's a lot more you can do in the $50 license."
  • "I would rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "The solution is cheap in my country."
  • More Slack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify… more »
    Top Answer:You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license and… more »
    Top Answer:SAP JAM is currently working in conjunction with other SAP solutions, specifically integrated with Microsoft Teams. I anticipate that it will have further integrations with various other solutions… more »
    Top Answer:Nowadays, we don't need to visit an HR portal. Our marketing and human resources teams directly share details about birthdays, upcoming events, and important dates in Slack. Whether it's a training… more »
    Top Answer:We could see improvement in Slack by having an integrated meeting tool. Currently, we rely on third-party integration tools like Zoom to schedule meetings. It would be much more convenient to schedule… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    328
    Comparisons
    278
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    788
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    2,499
    Comparisons
    1,079
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Yammer logo
    Compared 45% of the time.
    SharePoint logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    Microsoft 365 Business logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Symphony logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    SharePoint logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    ChatWork logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Chatter logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Atlassian Confluence logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Encourage and facilitate collaboration in the cloud _ with our enterprise social network solution, SAP Jam.

    Slack is where work happens. It’s a digital workspace that powers your organization — all the pieces and the people — so you can get things done.

    Slack brings all your communication together in one place. It's real-time messaging, archiving and search for modern teams.

    Sample Customers
    INEOS Melamines GmbH, Medtronic, Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Plan International, Sailing Team Germany, Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection, SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequi
    Strava, The New York Times, Spotify, Blue Bottle Coffee Company, Eventbrite, Box, Circa, Stripe
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    Insurance Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Marketing Services Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization83%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Financial Services Firm3%
    University1%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise84%
    Large Enterprise11%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews while Slack is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Social Software with 68 reviews. SAP Jam is rated 8.4, while Slack is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Slack writes "A competitive solution that improves collaboration and productivity". SAP Jam is most compared with Yammer, SharePoint and Microsoft 365 Business, whereas Slack is most compared with Symphony, SharePoint, ChatWork, Chatter and Atlassian Confluence.

    See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.