We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."
"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."
"Scalability is the best feature of the solution."
"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."
"Technical support is helpful."
"I like the way Splunk interacts with various systems via the API. The ability to integrate Splunk with our ticketing system has been an immense help because we can maintain our workflow while blending Splunk with our support desk and other ways that we track work."
"Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task."
"The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"The pricing could be a bit more reasonable. It would be great if it were feasible for smaller organizations."
"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."
"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."
"Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement."
"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."
"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 32 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.