Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Osman Nayan - PeerSpot reviewer
IP/DDOS Senior Engineer at Türk Telekom International
Real User
Top 5
Stable and easy-to-use solution
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a scalable solution."
  • "Its documentation could be better."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution to check the tickets and reports of the configuration site.

What is most valuable?

The solution is easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The solution’s documentation could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for one year.

Buyer's Guide
A10 Thunder TPS
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about A10 Thunder TPS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution. Around 50% of our staff use it.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend the solution to others and rate it a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Ethernet IP Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Real User
Our customers that are directly connected have almost instantaneous mitigation
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has reduced the amount of manual intervention required during an attack. We have the inline solution and when it comes to the customers that we have on it, it has saved us some troubleshooting time."
  • "If there's one aspect of A10 that needs improvement it would be the training. All of their training is done online, at least in what we've been exposed to. I would like to have a classroom environment for training... It would give [people] a chance to provision it."

What is our primary use case?

Availability is very critical for us. We use it to mitigate DDoS attacks for rural North Dakota. We really don't use it to identify attacks, we use third-party software, a Kentik solution, to identify anomalies within the IP stack. Then, we turn around and send mitigation profiles to the A10 based on an API call, and the A10 initializes a BGP session to our core routers to offload that traffic and mitigate it.

We provide hosted solutions so our deployment of A10 is private cloud.

How has it helped my organization?

Our setup is something of a hybrid solution. We're using the third-party software, the Kentik solution, but we also have some clients that are directly connected to TPS. There is a 30-second delay in time to mitigation for clients that are not direct. By the time that third-party solution identifies something and sends it, via API, to the TPS, there's about a 30-second delay. When we have customers that are directly connected, they have just about instantaneous mitigations with TPS.

We use that inline setup as a premium service. If customers can tolerate a small spike in traffic flow until the mitigation happens then we'll just leave them on the Kentik solution. If they want it instantaneously then we'll put them inline and connect them directly to the TPS for that. Customers who opt for the premium service include financials, utilities - anything which needs that instant mitigation and understands the threat of DDoS. Some entities can tolerate it if they're down for a minute or two minutes and it's not crucial that they pay the extra dollars.

Overall, DDoS attacks affect small-town North Dakota in a fairly large fashion, meaning that they could affect infrastructure from schools to county courthouses to libraries, etc. Those places aren't directly associated with the target of the attack but the appliance itself and the solution in general allow for the protection of those services in those communities. It has been very successful.

The solution has reduced the amount of manual intervention required during an attack. We have the inline solution and when it comes to the customers that we have on it, it has saved us some troubleshooting time. If we can see that there is an active zone, we know that their traffic is being mitigated. If a customer calls and says, "Hey, I have internet problems", one of the first things we check is if there's a DDoS attack happening.

Anytime you filter, you set up thresholds, you can identify your traffic patterns a lot better.
It has helped in that aspect as well. We did miss attacks previously.

What is most valuable?

We're just using a portion of it, the mitigation aspect.

What needs improvement?

If there's one aspect of A10 that needs improvement it would be the training. All of their training is done online, at least in what we've been exposed to. I would like to have a classroom environment for training. I would like to say, "Okay, if we have three or four people who need to get trained up, we want to send them to a classroom." That way they're detached from their home office and have the lab facilities. They can have a classroom environment or experience instead of a virtual classroom. It would give them a chance to provision it. There's a better experience in a classroom than in a virtual classroom.

It's not a terrible issue, but the training was the biggest thing that we faced. We're two years into this and we haven't done all the training probably needed to fully support it, because our deployment is very limited. But when we did want to pursue training, I believe that the training was all virtual.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for about two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's been rock solid. We haven't had any issues with power supplies or software anomalies. It's been a pretty good platform.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For our deployment, we're probably not even using ten percent of its capacity as far as throughput port space. For us, the scalability is very high. For us, it's like investing future-forward.

The usage potential increases daily, exponentially, based on the internet curve. But we're just using a small percentage of the features and a small percentage of its capacity.

We have about 200 customers that have access to the solution with 100,000 users on their side. We carry something like 80 Gig of internet traffic into the state. Because we're using that third-party for the majority, TPS doesn't see all that 80 Gig of traffic. It only sees the traffic that has been identified by the third-party software. The TPS isn't necessarily handling packet, packet, packet, packet; it's handling only packets that are being sent to it by the third-party. In that scope of scalability, it's almost exponential because we're only identifying the traffic flows and patterns that need to be mitigated.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have opened a few tickets with TAC and they've been good, along with their sales engineering team. We may have a customer that will have an atypical type of deployment. In that case, we'll bring in the sales engineering team or TAC and they'll get us in contact with an expert in that field. Their tech support has been very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have a previous solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. You set up your routing tables, your interfaces. There was no magic there.

We have two and we had them both up and running within three or four days, meshed with our network. The process was to get it connected to our core internet routers and have it start talking to a third-party software and, after that, start the mitigation processes.

What about the implementation team?

We mostly did it ourselves. From the A10 side, we had our sales engineer and we had a few calls with their support staff. Based on that, we developed a roadmap and then we self-installed and deployed it.

What was our ROI?

Our situation is unique because we're owned by the 14 independent broadband providers in North Dakota. So we may not directly see an ROI because the bandwidth of the DDoS traffic basically gets to us. However, we save that extra bandwidth to our owner companies from downstream services. We're saving our members money with the solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did a proof of concept and had a bake-off between Arbor and A10 and Kentik. Because of the reports that we wanted and how we wanted to handle things, the third-party and the A10 solution were technically the best, and scalable.

The flexibility of solutions was important to us. We have the ability to either go inline, to connect directly to the TPS, or to bring it through the third-party. That in itself was a major selling point because we're not stuck with one solution. If we decide that we want to change third-party vendors, we're not married to it. We can shop around and if there's something better that comes out, we can still interface the TPS system with that new software. It meant we weren't just saddled to one vendor for a DDoS solution.

What other advice do I have?

Do your research to understand your solution options. Then, have a PoC bake-off and task the system. Identify ad-hoc anomalies in your test-bed and look at the time to mitigation. Look at different types of situations to see, if an anomaly comes along, how long it would take you to deploy an ad-hoc solution or redirect the traffic. Research and proof of concept is our biggest thing. We never do anything without doing them thoroughly.

The biggest thing I have learned is how many attacks there are and how many different ways the attacks happen, throughout an attack. You can have a DNS attack, you can have an ICMP attack. You can have all these different flavors of attacks. That was probably the biggest eye-opener for me. When you hear the word "DDoS," everything gets put into a container. It's not until you look into the container that you see all the different types of attacks that are summed up by that word.

The solution has been rock solid for us. We haven't had any issues. We've had numerous attacks and it's worked perfectly.

I don't know that it has an increased network availability notably but it has added to it. Instead of having four-nines of availability, we've got five-nines. It's a solution and a package, so it's not our only tool in our toolbox.

We only use the TPS side of it and we're not 100 percent trained up on it, even though we've had two years of deployment on it. We don't know the whole, full-meal deal on what it can do. There's a possibility we'll go to the load balancing and some of those features. Even though we have hosted solutions, we don't have enough because we're a small company. There are other features but we'll explore those as we need.

We have just two people who have access for configuration of the solution and its operations, in our engineering operations.

I would have to rate A10 TPs as a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with the product. Of course, we don't want to give tens because then get people get cocky about it. 

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
A10 Thunder TPS
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about A10 Thunder TPS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Security IT at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
With favorable pricing and good support for its users, the tool is also useful for server load balancing
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's support is one of the coolest things about the product. I"
  • "We have had some issues with implementation. So, it is the only area that needs improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We use A10 Thunder TPS for load balancing, especially server load balancing.


What is most valuable?

The solution's firewall features are the most valuable feature of the solution. I think we can use all the features or capabilities that come with the product's license. Maybe today, we are just implementing an SOP or LOB.

What needs improvement?

We have had some issues with implementation. So, it is the only area that needs improvement. However, I have no issues with the product, so it is probably fine.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with A10 Thunder TPS.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?


How are customer service and support?

The solution's support is one of the coolest things about the product. I rate the solution's technical support an eight and a half out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

We are currently having some issues with the implementation. I think it is because the partner is not ready for implementation, and it's not that they don't have the experience. So, even though we have some issues right now with implementation, the product is very good.


What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's price is one of the coolest things about the product. We may need to pay fifty percent more if we purchase other solutions. For the payments made to A10 Thunder TPS, we have received three-year support.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Ahmed Madibbo - PeerSpot reviewer
Professional Services Consultant at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Reseller
Provides the ability to configure many features for DDoS attacks, but it is very difficult to implement
Pros and Cons
  • "They give us the ability to configure many features for DDoS. There are many items that we can use."
  • "It is very difficult to implement. It should be made a bit easier to implement. There is also a lack of resources on the internet. They need to develop more resources."

What is our primary use case?

We are the main distributor for A10 Networks. It is used as an appliance. It is mainly used to identify problems in the network. It helps us to stop any type of DDoS attack.

We are using its latest version.

What is most valuable?

They give us the ability to configure many features for DDoS. There are many items that we can use.

What needs improvement?

It is very difficult to implement. It should be made a bit easier to implement. There is also a lack of resources on the internet. They need to develop more resources.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been a distributor for more than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is mostly stable.

How are customer service and support?

Their support is good, but it is not excellent.

How was the initial setup?

It is very difficult to do the setup. It needs to be a little bit easier. There are not many resources on the internet for help, and there are also not many people who have knowledge of this product.

Its implementation takes two to three weeks. Two engineers are usually enough.

What other advice do I have?

Before implementing this solution, you should know and get complete information about the features that are possible and that are not possible.

I would rate it a six out of 10. It should be easier to set up. Currently, it is very difficult.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Jaffar Ali - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Technical Services at TechnoBIZ
Reseller
Top 5
Enables us to keep a record of all the invoices and to track accrued sales but I would like to see an advanced reporting feature
Pros and Cons
  • "We can keep track of all the customer's requirements. We can forecast our trails and we can forecast our overall financial things."
  • "I would like for them to develop an advanced reporting feature."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for our support ticketing and invoice generation. We're resellers and we provide it to our customers. 

Our other use cases are for keeping a record of all the invoices and we use it for our sales to track the accrued sales. 

How has it helped my organization?

We can keep track of all the customer's requirements. We can forecast our trails and we can forecast our overall financial things.

What needs improvement?

We are really trying to improve our sales module. When we need to see our exact payments and invoices we can track which payments and invoices are due so that we can make sure that all the invoices are done on time.

I would like for them to develop an advanced reporting feature. 

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable. We're using a very basic model and it's the basic version. There are very few features so for those features, it is very stable. If we decide that we're going to implement more features into it, then there could be some concern about the stability of the product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is fine. 

We have sixteen users. On the support side when we generate tickets, we are quoted fifty plus customers that are on this solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment only took a few hours. The  user training takes at least a day and then the whole site will go up in around a weeks time. It's all web-based so the back ends sometime require us to make changes but overall it's pretty simple and straightforward.

We only require one staff member for maintenance. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Resellers.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Technical Consultant at Westcon
Real User
A10 Thunder TPS (Threat Protection System) is the world’s highest-performance DDoS protection solution, leading the industry in precision, intelligent automation, scalability, and performance.
Pros and Cons
  • "The GUI is very use-friendly. You can configure it through CLI or GUI, they give you an option to choose. It's a good solution in terms of the appliance itself. It's very light compared to other brands that offer DDoS solutions."
  • "They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."

What is our primary use case?

One of the largest persistent threats to service uptime is Distributed Denial of Service Attacks (DDoS). The networking industry and business analysts are seeing a trend in increasing DDoS attacks. These attacks are occurring more frequently and with greater intensity and increased sophistication. Legacy DDoS protection solutions suffer from the following fatal limitations that have made them ineffective at protecting against these attacks:

• Lack of flexibility

• Inability to scale

What is most valuable?

MULTI-VECTOR ATTACK PROTECTION

Detect and mitigate DDoS attacks of many types, including volumetric, protocol, or resource attacks; application-level attacks; or IoT-based attacks. Hardware acceleration offloads the CPUs and makes Thunder TPS particularly adept to deal with simultaneous multi-vector attacks

For how long have I used the solution?


What do I think about the stability of the solution?


What do I think about the scalability of the solution?


How are customer service and technical support?


How was the initial setup?


What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The A10 aGalaxy management system provides centralized management of Thunder TPS systems and policies, orchestrates detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks, and delivers a single-pane-of-glass view of the generated reports across all managed Thunder TPS appliances.

No need to license each feature to activate it, it got a perpetual licensing and everything is there, you just have to configure and enable the feature when you need it.

What other advice do I have?

Select Thunder TPS hardware models to benefit from our Security and Policy Engine (SPE) hardware acceleration, leveraging FPGA-based FTA technology and other hardware-optimized packet-processing for highly scalable flow distribution and hardware DDoS protection capabilities.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: distributor
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free A10 Thunder TPS Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free A10 Thunder TPS Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.