ASP.NET Reviews

We use ASP.NET for e-commerce, attendance modules, and school management.

It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop.

ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster.

I have been using ASP.NET for three years.

ASP.NET is a stable solution.

Around 150 users are using the solution in our organization.

The solution’s technical support could be faster.

Neutral

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

ASP.NET is not an expensive solution.

Overall, I rate ASP.NET an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case is to develop food and geolocation applications. 

The language is easy to learn, understand and develop. There is good documentation available.

There should be more Python capabilities available.   

I have been using the solution for twenty years. 

I would rate stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. 

I would rate technical support an eight out of ten. 

The initial setup is easy because I use container services. 

The language is free to use. The pricing wouldn't be a problem for the paid version.  

I have used Python to improve my applications, but I have used ASP.NET for all applications. 

I will continue to use this solution in the future because I am a developer, and I like the language.  

I think developers are going to keep the solution relevant forever. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

If a project is inherited from a client, we would need to utilize ASP.NET, in such cases, we strongly recommend upgrading to .NET

ASP.NET does not help organizations it is a distraction and out of date.

The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET.

The solution is out of date and should not be used.

I have been using ASP.NET since it came out.

The solution is out of date and shouldn't be used. It is not stable.

This is a legacy solution and I would strongly recommend people upgrade to .NET. This is outdated technology.

I rate ASP.NET a one out of ten.

Our primary use case for ASP.NET is for the web-based department. However, as local platforms are being introduced, we are trying to reduce our use of ASP.NET.

This solution has helped my organization by allowing me to build internal sites and Web-based applications.

In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit.

I have been using this solution for almost 20 years.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

There are a lot of consultants on the market that provide support services, so we hardly ever went with Microsoft's tech support.

I would say that the initial setup process was quite straightforward.

I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution.

Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Our company used the solution to provide web services, pages, and registration forms for our client's job portal. 

The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place. 

The solution is very user-friendly.

Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side. 

We created server-side code in ASP based on client-side code but questions that hit the server took time to render as they searched the data. Node.js includes client-assisting languages that speed up the process. 

I used the solution for nine years at my prior place of employment. 

The solution is more stable than others because there are various security protocols that can be implemented to restrict users. 

The solution is easy to scale. 

Our company had more than 100 users with no issues. 

I did not need to contact support. 

The initial setup was easy. 

We pre-wrote code and identified functionality so that any deployment only took about fifteen minutes.

The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment. 

The solution provides a good framework for creating commands and portals for user log-ins. It can perform many functions such as special credentials or authorizations that are specific to each user. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

The solution has good scalability.

The solution's initial setup is intermediate, and it could be improved.

I have been using ASP.NET for two years.

I rate ASP.NET an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate ASP.NET a nine out of ten for scalability.

I rate ASP.NET a seven out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

We all deploy our applications in Git and raise one PR, and we need to deploy it in Jenkins, where we need to test the application. So, it takes one or two minutes because we are in the pipeline. A lot of users are using it, and they also have their changes. We need first to confirm if they are testing anything or not. After that, we can deploy changes and PR. Doing a whole task might take three to seven days, based on the availability of other users and employees.

I have done some UI changes and modifications because the response was not coming from the back end of data for some internal applications. I have also done some filtration from the front end.

Overall, I rate ASP.NET eight and a half out of ten.

I am using ASP.NET for business solutions.

The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is the support of multiple platforms with ASP.NET Core. Additionally, Azure integrates well with ASP.NET and Visual Studio.

It would be beneficial if Microsoft provided more support for certain technologies, such as Blazor, in the form of basic components. As it stands, some reliance on third-party tools may be necessary. Having more support from Microsoft for these technologies would make it easier for users to build and maintain applications. For example, the grids, date pickers, and dropdown lists would be components to add.

I have been using ASP.NET for approximately 15 years.

We have not had any issues with the stability of ASP.NET.

I rate the stability of ASP.NET a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable. It's not a very high-impact solution. We mostly use it for internal business, and it's good. We have approximately 200 users that use the solution.

I rate the scalability of ASP.NET an eight out of ten.

We don't rely on Microsoft's support. We use third-party companies for support.

The initial setup of ASP.NET is straightforward.

This is a free solution. However, we have some server licensing costs which are not directly a cost of using the solution.

I rate ASP.NET an eight out of ten.

Our use cases depend on the specific requirements. For example, to get data from Jira to process and build reports using Power BI.

I like a feature in the recent release. So, I like the features around logging and pipelines provided by the recent .NET Framework.

I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET.

I have been using it for five years. 

It's a pretty stable solution. I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I will rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

The support is good. 

I have experience with desktop technical solutions, web applications, and Windows applications using VPN.

I would rate my experience with the initial setup a seven out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

It is deployed both on cloud and on premises. The deployment time depends. If you're deploying to the cloud, it's typically faster. If you're doing it on-premises, it will take some more time.

The pricing is somewhere in the middle. Not too expensive, but not the cheapest either.

It's a pretty stable and scalable tool, and it has very good support. If you find an issue, you can just Google it and find a solution easily online because there's a large community using it. It's pretty easy to learn, and you can usually find help if you encounter any issues.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.