ASP.NET vs SharePoint Designer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
587 views|189 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,117 views|412 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and SharePoint Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a pretty stable solution.""It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack.""The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET.""We use ASP.NET to develop web applications and web API. I'm working at a government financial institution in Mexico that helps citizens buy a house""The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient.""The developer support for ASP.NET is a big positive. It's actually very good, and since there are so many people who use ASP.NET, it's easy to get responses to questions about ASP.NET in the broader community.""I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution.""It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."

More ASP.NET Pros →

"The feature I find most valuable, is the workflow of the product.""The management and monitoring features are good.""We like the highly customizable websites that you can build.""The basic functionality the solution makes it easy to share documents or information with the team.""The drag and drop feature is the most useful feature when using this solution.""The technical support from Microsoft is very good.""The most valuable feature of SharePoint Designer is the storing of files. In the Office 365 version, there is the capability to share files with others which is helpful. The files have cross versions capability. If the solution is shut down abruptly the file is stored on the system automatically.""The initial setup is straightforward."

More SharePoint Designer Pros →

Cons
"An area for improvement is the structure template.""Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side.""The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved.""It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed.""There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable.""I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET.""ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster.""The capability related to Python needs to be improved."

More ASP.NET Cons →

"If they included some training modules, I would give them a ten, because that would make it even more user-friendly.""The solution is a bit complex. They should work to simplify it.""SharePoint Designer could improve most in analytics and reporting.""In the solution, if you have a case of accidental deletion, there's no restoration, which should have been there.""If you compare the workflow with other engines like Olympus and K2, it is very complicated to create a workflow.""The web services aspect of the solution is very weak.""SharePoint Designer could improve by making the searching feature better. It is not accurate in some cases, and there are some descriptions that are not clear.""This solution could definitely be made easier to use."

More SharePoint Designer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is a bit high and I believe that it can be brought down."
  • "ASP.NET is an open-source solution."
  • "I think ASP.NET, in deployment, is something that's quite costly when you're on a cloud provider such as Azure, and you have to pay the server cost. On average, it can cost approximately $1,000 per month to host a good site with a few databases."
  • "The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment."
  • "The solution is open source and free."
  • "ASP.NET is open-source and free of charge."
  • "This is a free solution. However, we have some server licensing costs which are not directly a cost of using the solution."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, with one being cost efficient and 10 being the most expensive, I would rate ASP.NET's pricing at six. There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."
  • More ASP.NET Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I've never paid for SharePoint Designer. What I paid for, is the SharePoint license, the cava, and then the client accesses the line fee."
  • "This solution is free of charge."
  • "The cost of the license is based on the size of the user base."
  • "There is no licensing cost for Designer—it's free."
  • "SharePoint Designer is less expensive than other solutions we have used. We purchased Office 365 which SharePoint comes with the package."
  • "Priced per user per month with different plans to choose from."
  • "SharePoint Online has a subscription-based model for payments and the price is based on user usage."
  • "Most of the time, our customer's license from Microsoft includes the cost of SharePoint. However, if you have to buy it then SharePoint is quite expensive."
  • More SharePoint Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop.
    Top Answer:ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster.
    Top Answer:It saved me big time once! My car got broken into and they took my laptop with all my files. But I didn't have to worry because everything was backed up on SharePoint. It was a lifesaver!
    Top Answer:I've leased Microsoft SharePoint Designer for the enterprise, not System Center. It's for private work, web development specifically.
    Top Answer:For me, it's flexible enough for most things. But maybe they could improve the user interface to make it easier for everyone to navigate and use. That would be a big plus.
    Ranking
    Views
    587
    Comparisons
    189
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,117
    Comparisons
    412
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    ASP.NET is a free web framework for building web sites, apps and services with HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
    SharePoint Designer is the tool of choice for the rapid development of SharePoint applications. Using SharePoint Designer, advanced users and developers alike can rapidly create SharePoint solutions in response to business needs. Advanced users can compose no-code solutions that encompass a variety of common scenarios, from collaborative sites and web publishing to Line-Of-Business data integration, business intelligence solutions, and human workflows, leveraging the building blocks available in SharePoint in an easy to use environment.
    Sample Customers
    Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Vengo Labs, Oneview Healthcare, BookedOut, Ministry of Rural Development, Grupo WRR
    Pyrotek Inc., ICA, Deliver Australia, Secretary of Economy of Mexico, Aegon, ABB Switzerland, Ascent Yarns Private Limited, Bakewell Biscuits Pvt Ltd, Hitachi Consulting
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while SharePoint Designer is ranked 2nd in .NET Development Services with 49 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while SharePoint Designer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint Designer writes "Intuitive, customizable, and reliable". ASP.NET is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight, whereas SharePoint Designer is most compared with Microsoft Visual Studio. See our ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer report.

    See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

    We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.