ASP.NET Reviews

• Stability
• Easy to use
• A lot of resources available on the internet
• Full support from the vendor

Our main product is built using ASP.Net. So, basically, ASP.Net is helping us formulate the future of our company.

Improving the project ready templates will add a great amount of value. They also need to find a way to fix the references that are not .Net built neither in assemblies nor available in NuGet packages.

I've used it for more than 11 years.

In older versions there were issues, however, most of these issues have been fixed in the newer versions.

Not really.

There were issues in the older versions, but usually scalability is an architectural issue, not an implementation one.

Customer Service:

It's excellent.

Technical Support:

It's excellent.

I worked on Java and PHP, and switched because of the features mentioned above.

It is very easy and straightforward.

We did it in-house.

The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use.

I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind. 

I have been using ASP.NET for eight years. 

I think it's stable. There haven't been a lot of bugs. 

We have around five users using this solution. 

I haven't needed to be in touch with customer support yet.

The initial setup was straightforward. 

I would recommend this solution. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

Hybrid Cloud

I am a Microsoft .NET technology architect and ASP.NET is one of the platforms that I develop with and support.

I like ASP.NET in its entirety.

ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform.

In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries.

It would be helpful if they supplied templates or boilerplate code for the microservices architecture that would assist people in starting to build software.

ASP.NET does not support Apple or macOS devices.

I have been using ASP.NET for 15 years.

I have not had an experience that resulted in having to contact technical support.

I have not worked with similar frameworks from other vendors.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

I started my career with ASP.NET and I like most of the things about it. I started working with Microsoft technologies rather than Java technologies, and I am still with Microsoft.

In India, they are moving to cross-platform deployment using the .NET work and I haven’t seen any drawbacks, apart from not being supported by Apple or macOS. I think that most customers prefer Windows applications, so they will prefer ASP.NET.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

On-premises

1. No ViewState or "surprise crap". 2. Faster server-side. 3. Simplified model for multiple related views. 4. Unit testable.

1. Difficult to convert an existing site. 2. Not best for SEO out of the box. 3. Challenges if you’re not running IIS7.

If I needed to build a new site from scratch, and was able to use IIS7, it would be extremely likely that I would choose ASP.NET MVC. It’s a joy to work with (possibly because it’s "new"), and just makes sense. If I needed to work with an existing site, I would certainly have to consider the pro’s and con’s I mentioned above. ASP.NET MVC gives us an amazing new tool in our huge Microsoft toolbox.

Rapid Development Easy to learn Wide range third party controls availability

frequent version upgrade make you feel outdated unless you keep yourself updated

1. Easy to use and develop pages. 2. Its web applications are professional class. 3. With support from other .NET languages any knowledge of .NET can help one move around ASP.NET. Others: include VB.NET, C#

1. The pages are relatively large and hence may be slow. 2. It is not open source so i find it expensive to buy although as a company it is worth it purchasing but as an individual developer it is too expensive. 3. If you want to test your site unit wise with ASP.NET that is not an easy task.

ASP.NET is very easy to use if one is familiar with .NET framework.