We use AWS Auto Scaling to define the number of instances depending on specific requirements.
Infrastructure Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has a good user interface and efficient technical support services
Pros and Cons
- "It helps us to reduce the cost."
- "AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We need ten instances during peak hours, but we need only two instances during off hours. We can auto-scale or downscale the number of instances using the product. It helps us to reduce the cost.
What is most valuable?
The product's most valuable feature is setting a minimum or maximum number of instances.
What needs improvement?
AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better. At present, we have to recall the last issues we encountered and the steps used to resolve them.
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using AWS Auto Scaling for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate AWS Auto Scaling a seven out of ten. It could be better.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate AWS Auto Scaling a nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support services are good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
We can easily implement the product for simple configuration. However, we need an expert to help us with complex configuration.
What was our ROI?
The product generates a good return on investment for us.
What other advice do I have?
I rate AWS Auto Scaling an eight out of ten. Its user interface works fine. We have three options for load balancers: classic load balancer, application load balancer, and termination network load balancer. I advise others not to use the classic load balancer.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
DevOps Engineer at RedPluto Analytics Pvt Ltd
Helps us optimize expenses and handle increased traffic and offers various scaling options
Pros and Cons
- "The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."
- "The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
What is our primary use case?
We use AWS Auto Scaling for scaling purposes, particularly to manage costs and meet client requirements for scaling up resources at specific times. It helps us optimize expenses and handle increased traffic by automatically scaling instances when needed.
What is most valuable?
I appreciate several features of AWS Auto Scaling. The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful. Additionally, the ability to utilize templates for updating scaling policies makes the process efficient with minimal downtime.
What needs improvement?
While I haven't found any significant need for improvement in AWS Auto Scaling, the setup can be a bit complex in some situations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using AWS Auto Scaling for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of the solution as a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of the solution as a ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support as an eight out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
The configuration process for AWS Auto Scaling is generally straightforward, but complexity can arise with numerous instances and policies. However, it remains manageable overall.
What other advice do I have?
We use AWS Auto Scaling to handle peak traffic times in our application. Depending on the situation, we employ either step scaling or target scaling. Step scaling is used when traffic increases gradually, while target scaling is utilized during specific time intervals when traffic spikes suddenly. This helps optimize costs by automatically adjusting resources based on demand fluctuations.
Auto Scaling has been particularly beneficial for our cloud resources, especially within AWS. We have found it most useful for managing our RDS instances, particularly during backup scenarios. Auto Scaling helps us handle spikes in demand and ensures we have sufficient resources available when needed.
The feature of AWS Auto Scaling that has significantly reduced our operational costs is its ability to scale up and down based on traffic requirements. By automatically adjusting resources like CPU and memory utilization, it optimizes costs efficiently. Integration with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch for monitoring and SMS for alerts, further enhances its utility, helping us manage resources effectively.
The predictive scaling feature of AWS has improved our application's performance by accurately anticipating increases in traffic and adjusting resources accordingly. This is particularly beneficial during peak times, such as during events or holidays. By monitoring trends and predictions, AWS helps us set up effective scaling policies to ensure optimal performance and resource utilization.
The health check integration feature in AWS Auto Scaling has significantly improved our application's availability. If an instance becomes unhealthy or goes down, Auto Scaling automatically replaces it with a new one, minimizing downtime to almost zero.
I would recommend AWS Auto Scaling to others. My advice would be to carefully assess your application's requirements and determine the appropriate scaling policies, whether it is predictive scaling, target scaling, or step scaling. Configure Auto Scaling accordingly and utilize AWS tools for monitoring and health checks to ensure optimal performance.
Overall, I would rate AWS Auto Scaling as a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Apr 1, 2024
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloud security engineer at Thecornelis
Provides good documentation, but its installation process could be easy to understand
Pros and Cons
- "It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
- "The product’s pricing needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We use AWS Auto Scaling to manage load for instances, including factors such as increased traffic. It helps us monitor and set up alerts and scaling policies to manage the memory usage for infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
The intelligence and automation built into AWS Auto Scaling are valuable features. It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load.
What needs improvement?
The product’s pricing needs improvement.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable product.
How are customer service and support?
I contacted the technical support team to assist me with upstreaming, WAF, and directory authentication issues.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is complicated for someone who has yet to gain prior experience working with it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I rate AWS Auto Scaling a six out of ten. It has good speed, documentation, pricing, and security features. However, there are better and more affordable products for handling traffic and scalability.
I advise others to know the specific scaling, computing, and traffic requirements. They need to check the exact use cases to set up scaling policies.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)
Boosts deployment efficiency with seamless automatic scaling capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."
- "I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."
- "Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."
- "Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Auto Scaling is mainly to deploy applications at scale.
How has it helped my organization?
Auto Scaling has made the deployment of applications more efficient, allowing us to manage traffic and maintain performance as user counts increase.
What is most valuable?
Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
What needs improvement?
Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps. This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for three or four years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
How are customer service and support?
The response times from the support team can be slow, and improvements could be made in efficiency and timeliness.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Auto Scaling initially was more work than expected due to configurations required for ALB and target groups, which is why I later switched to using CloudFormation for its simplicity.
What other advice do I have?
I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Last updated: Nov 7, 2024
Flag as inappropriateDevOps Engineer at Construction Specialties
Provides good documentation and enables organizations to optimize costs and balance workloads
Pros and Cons
- "I like the graphs provided by the tool."
- "The tool must include AI features."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution to optimize and balance the availability and cost of AWS. It has scaling policies that can be set according to our preferences. We evaluate how much CPU a project requires and whether the resources are being underutilized. We can reduce the project timelines and balance the workloads.
What is most valuable?
AWS Auto Scaling is a good platform. I like the graphs provided by the tool. Predictive scaling, smart scaling policies, and Auto Scaling groups are valuable features. Our EC2 instance can be automatically scaled to several instances set by the user. It can be used on Amazon ECS, Amazon DynamoDB, and other AWS services.
What needs improvement?
The tool must include AI features. The configuration process is not straightforward.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven't faced any bugs or breakdowns in AWS. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. Everything is available on time.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We did not face any issues with scalability. Everything is updated within seconds.
How are customer service and support?
The support is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. We must follow the documentation provided by Amazon. If we follow it step by step, the setup will be very easy. The documentation provides a deep knowledge of AWS.
What other advice do I have?
I will recommend the product to others. It helps understand the availability and how much CPU space a project will occupy. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Apr 18, 2024
Flag as inappropriateSenior Enterprise Architect at DV Consulting
A scalable solution that is easy to deploy and helps optimize the cost of the environment
Pros and Cons
- "The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
- "The solution must improve automation."
What is our primary use case?
If we don't use Auto Scaling, then AWS will be much more expensive. It's part of the optimization.
What is most valuable?
Everything is fine. There is nothing that I would change about the product.
What needs improvement?
The solution must improve automation.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is scalable. We have 300 users in our organization. We might increase the usage in the future.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is very straightforward. The deployment can be done in 15 minutes if we know what we're doing. To deploy the tool, we decide on the minimum and maximum we need. Then, we decide the incremental steps and how fast we want to increment or decrease. We have all the parameters to do it. The solution is cloud-based.
What about the implementation team?
In most cases, we can do the deployment ourselves. We do not need a technical team to maintain the product.
What was our ROI?
The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment. If we don’t use it, we will have to pay more.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good solution. I recommend people to use the product. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at Conacent Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
Easy to use and hosts internal business applications
Pros and Cons
- "Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
- "Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
What is most valuable?
Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling.
What needs improvement?
Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling. The solution’s pricing could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using AWS Auto Scaling for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution's stability is good. We have had cases of failure when the server crashed, but we did not have any problems because we had a backup.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
AWS Auto Scaling is a very scalable solution, and we can scale up very quickly. Around 100 users are using the solution regularly in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented the solution through an in-house team. Following some standard steps, the solution can be deployed in one day.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution. We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend AWS Auto Scaling to other users because it is easy to use. Having your own infrastructure is better and cheaper. We decided to use the solution since we didn't want the headache of having our own infrastructure.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Apr 12, 2024
Flag as inappropriateFounder at MENTURX
Provides efficient features for scalability and stability
Pros and Cons
- "It is a stable platform."
- "The product’s security features need improvement."
What is most valuable?
The product’s most valuable feature is scalability.
What needs improvement?
The product’s security features need improvement. They should incorporate a few optimization options.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using AWS Auto Scaling for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable platform.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have medium and large enterprises as our customers for AWS Auto Scaling.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support could be faster.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The product’s maintenance is manageable.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product has moderate pricing. It is expensive for some instances and reasonable for others. We purchase its monthly license. There are additional costs for support and extra features.
What other advice do I have?
I rate AWS Auto Scaling an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware, Splunk, and more!
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilityPopular Comparisons
AWS X-Ray
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)
OpenText SiteScope
Akamai mPulse
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware, Splunk, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Application Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
- What solution would you recommend for monitoring traffic utilization of leased lines?
- How Much Should I Budget for an APM Solution?
- Which is the best AANPM product? Should we be considering anything besides for Riverbed?
- Who Uses APM?
- What is your favorite tool for Application Performance Monitoring?
- How does synthetic monitoring differ from real user monitoring?
- Differences between SiteScope and dynaTrace?
- Splunk as an Enterprise Class monitoring solution -- thoughts?