Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs Akamai mPulse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
AWS Auto Scaling support is helpful and friendly, but opinions on response times vary, with some seeking faster service.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
AWS Auto Scaling requires better server launch times, pricing, documentation, security, and instance management, with emphasis on improved automation and AI features.
This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.7
AWS Auto Scaling excels in seamless scalability, receiving high ratings and praise for performance during peak demand and large user bases.
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.2
AWS Auto Scaling offers pay-as-you-go pricing, seen as expensive by some, but valued for quality and scalability.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.2
AWS Auto Scaling is reliable, stable, with users rating it highly despite occasional scaling lags or minor stability concerns.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
AWS Auto Scaling provides intelligent automation, scalability, and efficient traffic management with user-friendly features and predictable, smart scaling policies.
Its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai mPulse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
57th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Akamai mPulse is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Arivu Arumugam - PeerSpot reviewer
Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within
There is little that's unique about mPulse but since the solution is part of Akamai, you can do dynamic injections from within the product which is a great feature. the UI is quite good. It offers a basic set of features but nothing unique other than that as part of Akamai, you can do dynamic injections.
PRABHAT_MISHRA - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly interface and provides autoscaling without manual intervention
We utilize AWS Auto Scaling to handle peak traffic times in our application using scheduled scaling. We have scheduled traffic in the morning when we have higher traffic. Previously, we had customer issues with requests failing because of manual intervention. After enabling AWS Auto Scaling, none of the requests failed, giving a very smooth customer experience. In that way, the solution reduced our operational costs. The solution's health check feature is very important because it checks the heartbeat of the application to know whether it's running or not. If it's not running, we automatically get notified and look into the application to see what caused it. The health check integration feature has helped with the availability of the application. I would recommend the solution to people looking for automatic scaling of their application. Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
Auto Scaling's cost is neither cheap nor overly expensive. It depends on the scaling extent and application requirements, which can be calculated using a cost calculator. Customers pay based on how...
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
I haven't experienced any specific challenges with Auto Scaling. It automatically scales as necessary and reduces when the load decreases. There hasn't been a need for improvements.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SOASTA mPulse
AWS Auto-Scaling
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nordstrom, Gatwick, DirecTV, MSN, SquareSpace, SAP, Lenovo, Hallmark, myspace, Intuit, Kentucky Derby, Toys "R" Us, Netflix, Newsweek, The Washington Post, Lowe's, Nike, REI, Apple, Sears, Verizon, Wendy's, Huawei
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. Akamai mPulse and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.