AWS Lambda Reviews

AWS Lambda's most valuable feature is serverless architecture.

There are sometimes issues following an update.

I've been using AWS Lambda for about five years. 

AWS Lambda is stable.

AWS Lambda is scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward and took only a few minutes.

AWS Lambda's cloud version isn't expensive, and I'd rate its pricing as five out of five.

I would rate AWS Lambda ten out of ten.

It is used for capturing data through an API.

One of the most valuable features of this solution is its scalability. 

The overall performance of this solution could be improved. We would also like to have better integration with other AWS features. 

We have been using this solution for more than three years.

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

I would recommend this solution to others. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

We mainly use AWS Lambda for data transformation and authentication.

We moved our users into the Amazon Cognito pool, so it helps us to standardize our security practices, approaches, etc. We can customize Lambda for authentication to integrate it with API Gateway and other services.

Lambda is a lot like AWS Stack. It integrates well with other products. 

We've been using AWS Lambda for a year.

AWS Lambda is stable. 

AWS Lambda is scalable. 

Amazon doesn't have enough local support based in our country. But we haven't had to use support much. There are enough publicly available materials on the internet, so it's pretty well documented.

The AWS Lambda setup is doable. 

AWS Lambda's price is reasonable.

I rate AWS Lambda nine out of 10.  

We use AWS Lambda for several things. We are using it, for instance, to do authentication of information from HTTP sites. We use it for alerting when monitoring the direct database infrastructure, and we use it for API transformation.

It provides us with everything that we need.

We have been using AWS Lambda for two or three years.

We don't have a problem with the stability of AWS Lambda. It's very stable.

It is a scalable solution.

We have many users, but it is based on volume and the number of transactions, not by the number of users.

We have no issues with the technical support.

We use a number of AWS services.

The installation is straightforward. 

We have scripted most of the things. There was no problem with the installation.

We completed the installation ourselves.

The price in general could always be better.

The fees are volume-based.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate AWS Lambda a nine out of ten.

The product is primarily used to deploy code and provision a software solution to your clients when they don't have the time. You don't have to pay for the servers and the uptime.

It is my preferred product, as it provides me with source code within the solution.

It's a great product due to the fact that you don't have to pay for the servers and the uptime.

The solution is very stable.

The product scales well. 

The solution can be free to use.

The product could make the process of integration easier. 

The could be more integration testing. The internal is great with Lambda, however, I have to make sure I have done my tests on a related machine before deploying.

I've been using the solution for three years. I haven't used it for too long just yet.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It does not crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The solution scales very well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

Its scalability is always based on how much software there is. It's actually virtually building out. The API can scale up automatically. And if the API calls go down, then the system slows in real-time.

All my clients are using the product. All the projects I push to my clients are on Lambda.

I haven't dealt with technical support directly. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are in general. I don't have experience with them on that personal level. 

There is no setup process to deal with as the entire solution is on the cloud. It's very easy.

If you need to deploy it to a license, the first server you use you need to pay for a license. If you're going to open-source, there are no licenses required.

I'm just a customer and have clients on the solution.

I've had a very good experience with the product. I would rate it at a ten out of ten.

I would recommend the product to all developers.

I think the most valuable feature is the agility of the solution. You can deploy any codes you like and then control how you want them to be handled.

The deployment process is a bit complex, so it could be simplified to make it easier for beginners to deploy. 

I've been using Lambda for two years.

I reckon it's stable. We have not had any bugs with the solution. 

We have not had any problems with the scalability of the solution. We currently have roughly 100 users working with it. 

The tech support is very accommodating. If we have an issue or need to solve something, we speak directly to our Amazon contact person. This isn't really an issue, but their response time could be improved. I would rate the tech support as a four out of five.  

Positive

The price of the solution is reasonable. On a scale of one to five, with one being very expensive and five being competitive, I would rate Lambda a four. 

So far, the solution has been reliable and flexible. Our developers write the code, and we monitor any failures.

I would recommend Lambda to other users and rate this solution an eight out of ten.

It is useful in many scenarios. For example, in a microservices architecture where serverless functionality is required, one can use Lambda.

The basic feature that I like is that there is no server installation. It also has good support for various languages, such as Java, .NET, C#, and Python.

Its price should be improved. Its pricing is on the higher side. 

I am not sure if it currently supports the Go language. If it doesn't support the Go language, they can introduce it.

It is stable.

It is flexible and scalable. I have a couple of customers who are using Lambda. They are from the banking domain.

I've not reached out to Lambda technical support, but they should be good.

Its installation is simple. It doesn't require much effort. It hardly takes 10 to 15 minutes to make a Lambda service functional.

We had done the installation with the vendor. We have three developers for its implementation.

Its pricing is on the higher side.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate AWS Lambda an eight out of ten.

I back up my MongoDB, that database has user data. The performance of AWS Lambda has been fine.

It has made things a lot easier in terms of restoring if we need to and just not having to worry about the small things.

The console is very good, the user experience works very well.

I would like to see some better integration with other providers, like Cohesity, Druva, and others. I also think the Lambda interface could be better.

I don't have a ton of transactions, so it's very stable from my perspective. But I can imagine that it would not necessarily be as great for an enterprise product.

The scalability is hard for me to see from where I sit because I have a very small company, but I can imagine that it's going to be an issue.

Tech support is very minimalist. It's more do-it-yourself, which works for me, but I don't think it will work forever.

The setup was pretty complex because there were many steps. For me, it was complex because I was somewhat new at it. It could be easier for someone who has done it a bunch of times. I just found that it was a very dense user experience. There's a lot going on during setup.

The vendors on the shortlist now would be Cohesity, Commvault, Druva. But in the past, I went with this because we were using an AWS cluster anyway. It was easy-ish.

My most important criteria when selecting a vendor are

• user experience
• support.
  

I would rate AWS Lambda at a six out of 10 because it's not quite clear that it scales, but it does have a good, easy path from when you're using a cluster.