AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2 comparison

Amazon EC2 and AWS Lambda are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon EC2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1, while AWS Lambda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon EC2 holds a 5.1% mindshare in CS, compared to AWS Lambda’s 20.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon EC2 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of AWS Lambda users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2

Read 67 Amazon EC2 reviews

984 Views
895 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AWS Lambda

Read 88 AWS Lambda reviews

2,734 Views
2,488 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2

AWS Lambda

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

AWS Lambda and Amazon EC2 are prominent competitors in cloud computing. AWS Lambda's serverless and cost-efficient operation provides it with a distinct edge in rapid application deployment without the need for infrastructure management.

Features: AWS Lambda operates on a serverless, event-driven model, allowing applications to scale automatically and eliminating infrastructure concerns. It supports multiple programming languages and integrates effectively with other AWS services. Amazon EC2, however, offers powerful compute capabilities with customizable virtual servers, enabling applications to operate with high performance and a range of instance types that cater to more complex workloads.

Room for Improvement: AWS Lambda could enhance runtime capabilities beyond the current 15-minute execution limit and expand stability and integration options. Users also seek improved resource allocation for demanding applications. Amazon EC2, on the other hand, faces challenges with pricing complexity, migration support, and seamless transitions across instance types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Lambda facilitates rapid deployment due to its serverless nature, requiring no infrastructure management and leverages Amazon's strong support infrastructure, although complex issues may slow resolutions. Amazon EC2 offers granular control during deployment, but demands more expertise from users. Its customer service is reliable, with additional benefits for enterprises needing extensive support.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Lambda's cost-effective, pay-as-you-go pricing model provides significant savings, particularly for variable workloads by avoiding infrastructure costs. The return on investment is optimal due to its usage-based billing. Conversely, Amazon EC2 can become expensive, with pricing intricacies tied to usage and configuration considerations, but offers flexibility and dependability that can justify its higher costs for complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Lambda

Ranking in Compute Service

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 5.1%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Lambda is 20.7%, up from 19.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

KatlegoMabila

Senior AWS Account Manager at Silicon Overdrive

Offers customization and flexibility with great support

Scalability depends on whether the client wants to scale up or scale down. It decreases resources based on demand. The great aspect of scalability is the flexibility to allow business success to optimize resource solutions and cost efficiency. Another crucial aspect of scalability is auto-scaling. When you have the opportunity to auto-scale, it can't always be available for everything. If you have chosen to integrate with auto-scaling, it's marvellous and doesn't require additional effort. Auto-scaling gives you the edge by using the capacity you have efficiently, scaling up or down as needed. These flexibilities within the EC2 feature instances of AWS play a crucial role in helping me utilize AWS EC2 Intelligent efficiently.

Read full review

Andrew-Wong

AWS Developer at Centrica

Convenience in deployment process with room for code preview improvement

Having a better preview would be helpful. Sometimes, if my Lambda code is too big, it can be inconvenient as I'm unable to see my code when it exceeds a certain size. AWS has a limit, like a three-megabyte limit, beyond which I cannot view or edit the code easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to bring up servers and then do the computation and deposit means we don't have to maintain a data center. Everything is virtual and the security is also taken care of. It helps us to achieve compliance. Being a small startup with the security features that AWS provides helps us with compliance."

"The most valuable features of Amazon EC2 are ease of use and the services offered."

"The Key Management Service (KMS) feature is very helpful for security. It encrypts the data that is being saved. Cloud storage is also very helpful, and it could be AWS S3, which a lot of people use."

"What we have found most valuable is that we have not lost stability in the program."

"The platform has been quite stable and reliable."

"I believe that cloud solutions are better than physical servers."

"My company uses the tool for cloud monitoring. We have a production, staging, deployment, and testing environment in AWS. However, we do not use the managed service of AWS yet. My team uses the required parameters for security like VPC, firewall, gates of security as well as the external layer of the app."

"I use it for NextCloud and for developer purposes."

More Amazon EC2 pros

"By using Lambda, we can use Python code and the Boto3 solution."

"The programming language and the integration with other AWS services are the most valuable features."

"Lambda being serverless is a great feature that is appropriate for our use cases."

"The cool thing about AWS Lambda is that AWS does all the management. For compression, it is all about making the data small and then making it regular size again. We have an encode function and a decode function. AWS Lambda schedules each of those for us. It has a load balancer and all the fancy stuff, depending on the demand. The most valuable part of AWS Lambda is that I only need to write the software. I need to write two functions, and my cloud developer turns them into two AWS Lambda instances. That's it."

"The most valuable features of AWS Lambda are a serverless and event-driven architecture."

"Lambda allows you to focus on the code itself."

"It is my preferred product, as it provides me with source code within the solution."

"I have found all of the features valuable. It's an easy and cheap solution."

More AWS Lambda pros

Cons

"Its price can be reduced."

"Amazon EC2 could improve its dashboards and UI, they need to be more user-friendly."

"The support could be more responsive."

"Amazon EC2 could improve by reducing the price."

"We found Amazon EC2 to be pricey."

"The product could benefit from offering more mixed instance types that combine features from different series to suit diverse workload requirements better."

"I would like to see as much automation for data validation as possible in the future."

"Regional acceleration could improve. If I am hosting a website and I want the experience to be faster they should have this feature to allow for increased speeds."

More Amazon EC2 cons

"We've had to revamp the way that it works due to that 15-minute timeout limitation."

"There's room for improvement in the solution's warm start, which refers to the minimum time it takes to start up a Lambda function if you haven't been running it."

"If it is a specific ETL process or a long-term one, then AWS Lambda is not a good option."

"The metrics and reporting for this solution could be improved."

"One area of improvement is to include support for more programming languages. AWS Lambda does not support a lot of programming languages. You have to write the Lambda functions in a certain programming language. We are using C++. My developer knows a couple of other languages. Python is his favorite language, but Python is not supported in AWS Lambda."

"I think that perhaps Lambda could explore its functionality more."

"Lamba functions have cold-starts that can cause some delay."

"It currently requires manual user maintenance to upgrade and evaluate, and an automated provision for this would be beneficial."

More AWS Lambda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the free tier, although I have paid for some services that are not free. The overall cost of this solution depends on the services you use."

"The price of Amazon EC2 could improve. The Google Cloud Platform is more cost-effective."

"The solution has different pricing models, and its cost differs when you purchase it for one year or three years."

"It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."

"You pay as you use it."

"For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."

"The price of Amazon EC2 could improve. The Google Cloud Platform is more cost-effective."

"Reducing the price of the solution could lead to an improvement."

More Amazon EC2 pricing and cost advice

"I think the price is okay. However, if they add more functionality, they can have better prices. In fact, they should have better and more flexible packages for clients who have greater consumption of Lambda."

"AWS Lambda is a very inexpensive solution. They charge for the number of times we run it. If you run AWS Lambda for one time, they charge around 50 cents or 25 cents for the use. I don't know the exact price, but it's less than a dollar."

"AWS Lambda is inexpensive."

"The fees are volume-based."

"The price is expensive and is based on usage. The more users you have the higher the cost."

"The pricing varies based on the specific solution you're implementing, and in comparison to the value it provides, the overall cost is reasonable."

"The solution's price is average."

"AWS Lambda is not expensive for micro testing but is expensive if used for long deployment or long services."

More AWS Lambda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

29%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2?

The scalability and elasticity are helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?

Amazon EC2 is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?

The main thing that needs improvement is the cost. Other than that, there is nothing that needs improvement.

See all answers

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?

AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Lambda?

The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lambda?

The pricing of AWS Lambda is reasonable. It's beneficial and cost-effective for users regardless of the number of instances used.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2

Compared 29% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2

Compared 18% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 13% of the time

Google App Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Spark vs Amazon EC2

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Competitors

AWS Batch vs AWS Lambda

Compared 47% of the time

Apache NiFi vs AWS Lambda

Compared 19% of the time

Apache Spark vs AWS Lambda

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Lambda

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs AWS Lambda

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Lambda Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2

July 2025

Download Amazon EC2 product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lambda

July 2025

Download AWS Lambda product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS Lambda is a compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda executes your code only when needed and scales automatically, from a few requests per day to thousands per second. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. With AWS Lambda, you can run code for virtually any type of application or backend service - all with zero administration. AWS Lambda runs your code on a high-availability compute infrastructure and performs all of the administration of the compute resources, including server and operating system maintenance, capacity provisioning and automatic scaling, code monitoring and logging. All you need to do is supply your code in one of the languages that AWS Lambda supports (currently Node.js, Java, C# and Python).

You can use AWS Lambda to run your code in response to events, such as changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket or an Amazon DynamoDB table; to run your code in response to HTTP requests using Amazon API Gateway; or invoke your code using API calls made using AWS SDKs. With these capabilities, you can use Lambda to easily build data processing triggers for AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon DynamoDB process streaming data stored in Amazon Kinesis, or create your own back end that operates at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini

Netflix

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Lambda vs. Amazon EC2 report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.