AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2 comparison

Amazon EC2 and AWS Batch are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon EC2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1, while AWS Batch is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon EC2 holds a 10.2% mindshare in CS, compared to AWS Batch’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon EC2 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AWS Batch users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2

Read 70 Amazon EC2 reviews

1,387 Views
1,262 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AWS Batch

Read 10 AWS Batch reviews

1,315 Views
1,315 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2

AWS Batch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Amazon EC2 and AWS Batch offer cloud computing solutions but in different niches. Amazon EC2 stands out in user satisfaction for pricing and support, whereas AWS Batch is preferred for unique features despite its higher cost.

Features: Amazon EC2 offers highly flexible and scalable infrastructure that supports a wide range of virtual applications and operating systems. It includes security enhancements and various customization options, making it ideal for businesses needing high scalability and reliable infrastructure. AWS Batch specializes in large-scale parallel processing, providing dynamic resource allocation and seamless integration with other AWS services, catering to users requiring efficient computing for batch jobs.

Room for Improvement: Amazon EC2 could benefit from more streamlined configurations, better AMI upgrades, and transparent pricing. Users have suggested that improved load balancing options and cost transparency would be advantageous. AWS Batch requires enhancements in error handling, documentation, and simpler initial setup. Both services need to address pricing complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EC2 is versatile in deployment across private and public clouds and is known for relatively easy deployment. However, its customer service experiences vary based on the solutions architects assigned. AWS Batch is robust in both public and hybrid cloud environments, offering responsive support which can sometimes be inconsistent. Both services have strong documentation but could offer better integration assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon EC2's pricing is viewed as higher, yet its flexibility and scalability justify the costs, providing better ROI by reducing infrastructure and staffing costs. The ROI is aligned with traditional setups, showing efficiency savings. AWS Batch is seen as cost-effective, especially for irregular compute demands, offering cost management through spot instances. Although AWS Batch pricing is reasonable for batch processing, EC2's higher costs are balanced by its robust capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2 Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Batch

Ranking in Compute Service

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 10.2%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Batch is 15.6%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Batch	15.6%
Amazon EC2	10.2%
Other	74.2%

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

Shakir Bhatt

Senior Software Engineer at Netsmart Technologies

Flexibility empowers personalized management with minimal challenges

Initially, I was not sure how things were working. After I became familiar with it, I didn't feel any issues with Amazon EC2. However, one concern remains. I have heard from multiple people that if you have an Amazon EC2 instance running and you stop it, the billing continues unless you terminate the Amazon EC2 instance. This is an area where users should be prompted. I am not sure whether that information is currently available, but users might think billing stops when they stop their instance.

Read full review

Larry Singh

Head of Bioinformatics at Paratus Sciences

User-friendly, good customization and offers exceptional scalability, allowing users to run jobs ranging from 32 cores to over 2,000 cores

The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements. So, for instance, you don't exactly know how much compute resources you'll need and when you'll need them. So it's much better for that flexibility. But if you're going to be running jobs consistently and using the compute cluster consistently for a lot of time, and it's not going to have a lot of downtime, then the HPC system might be a better alternative. So, really, it boils down to cost versus usage trade-offs. It's going to be more expensive for a lot of people. In future releases, I would like to see anything that could help make it easier to set up your initial system. And besides improving the GUI a little bit, the interface to it, making it a little bit more descriptive and having more information at your fingertips, so if you could point to the help of what the different features are, you can get quick access to that. That might help. With most of the AWS services, the difficulty really is getting information and knowledge about the system and seeing examples. So, seeing examples of how it's being used under multiple use cases would be the best way to become familiar with it. And some of that would just come with experience. You have to just use it and play with it. But in terms of the system itself, it's not that difficult to set up or use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I believe that cloud solutions are better than physical servers."

"The greatest benefit of Amazon EC2 is its versatility, including the diverse range of servers available and the ability to connect to various resources."

"EC2 is secure and stable, and we have no complaints about it on AWS."

"The ability to quickly spin up instances on demand with zero upfront costs or infrastructure is the most valuable for me."

"One of the most valuable features of EC2 is its accessibility; I can easily access it through various tools like GIT and use it on mobile devices."

"I like EC2 because of its simple workload and the ability to configure VPCs and security groups."

"The best features of Amazon EC2 are its high performance and security."

"My company uses the tool for cloud monitoring. We have a production, staging, deployment, and testing environment in AWS. However, we do not use the managed service of AWS yet. My team uses the required parameters for security like VPC, firewall, gates of security as well as the external layer of the app."

More Amazon EC2 pros

"AWS Batch's deployment was easy."

"There is one other feature in confirmation or call confirmation where you can have templates of what you want to do and just modify those to customize it to your needs. And these templates basically make it a lot easier for you to get started."

"AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling."

"We can easily integrate AWS container images into the product."

Cons

"The ease of migrating applications could be improved."

"It's not the best of the best because we still have issues with downtime. We still have issues with the cost of storage, with all these different instance styles, and how much it costs. They cost an arm and a leg the higher you go."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"There are some specific features, such as ML features and AI features, that I would to see included in the next releases of Amazon EC2."

"They should fix the key pair name functionality and provide the ability to assign multiple key pair names to an EC2 instance. It is a key pair feature, and it provides you the ability to actually log into the server. It is basically like a password. In terms of new features, it should have the ability to increase and decrease the instance size based on certain times of the day. We should be able to do this without turning off the EC2 instance. Currently, you have to turn it off and then turn it back on. It should also have HTTPS or SSL integration."

"The initial deployment was complex."

"Regarding availability, a noticeable improvement would be the possibility of more load balancing configurations and the deployment of more datacenters, mainly in Latin America."

"Amazon EC2 could improve the console view. The ability to see the console view directly would be helpful, similar to what VMware has. Additionally, when the system is rebooting we are able to see a screenshot of the UI, but it would be a lot better if we could interact directly with the console level."

More Amazon EC2 cons

"When we run a lot of batch jobs, the UI must show the history."

"The solution should include better and seamless integration with other AWS services, like Amazon S3 data storage and EC2 compute resources."

"AWS Batch needs to improve its documentation."

"The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the free tier, although I have paid for some services that are not free. The overall cost of this solution depends on the services you use."

"For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."

"The pricing of this solution is variable. There is an open-source variant that is accessible via the public cloud, and then tiers that range in price depending on the level and amount of usage that is required."

"The license fee for Amazon EC2 is higher than its competitors."

"EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."

"There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."

"It's expensive, and it could be cheaper."

"It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."

More Amazon EC2 pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very fair."

"AWS Batch's pricing is good."

"AWS Batch is a cheap solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2?

The scalability and elasticity are helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?

Advice on Setup Cost, Pricing, and Licensing for EC2: 1. Start Small & Use Free Tier if Possible For new users or small applications, the AWS Free Tier offers limited EC2 usage free for 12 mont...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?

There are some specific features, such as ML features and AI features, that I would to see included in the next releases of Amazon EC2. Additionally, there is functionality available in Databricks ...

See all answers

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?

AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Batch?

AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Batch?

Pricing is good, as AWS Batch allows specifying spot instances, providing cost-effective solutions when launching jobs and spinning up EC2 instances.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Spark vs Amazon EC2

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2

Compared 14% of the time

Apache NiFi vs Amazon EC2

Compared 12% of the time

Zadara vs Amazon EC2

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Competitors

AWS Lambda vs AWS Batch

Compared 32% of the time

Apache Spark vs AWS Batch

Compared 24% of the time

AWS Fargate vs AWS Batch

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Compute Cloud Service vs AWS Batch

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Batch

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Batch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2

November 2025

Download Amazon EC2 product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Batch

November 2025

Download AWS Batch product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2

Amazon Batch

Overview

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. AWS Batch dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted. With AWS Batch, there is no need to install and manage batch computing software or server clusters that you use to run your jobs, allowing you to focus on analyzing results and solving problems. AWS Batch plans, schedules, and executes your batch computing workloads across the full range of AWS compute services and features, such as Amazon EC2 and Spot Instances.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack

Buyer's Guide

AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2

September 2025

Free Report: AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2 and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Batch vs. Amazon EC2 report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.