AWS Lambda vs Apache Spark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,893 views|2,256 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
11,937 views|8,175 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and AWS Lambda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lambda vs. Apache Spark Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Apache Spark provides a very high-quality implementation of distributed data processing.""The product’s most valuable feature is the SQL tool. It enables us to create a database and publish it.""This solution provides a clear and convenient syntax for our analytical tasks.""Apache Spark can do large volume interactive data analysis.""The main feature that we find valuable is that it is very fast.""The scalability has been the most valuable aspect of the solution.""The most crucial feature for us is the streaming capability. It serves as a fundamental aspect that allows us to exert control over our operations.""Spark can handle small to huge data and is suitable for any size of company."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"The feature I found most valuable about Lambda is the fact that it's serverless.""The utilization of containers is particularly beneficial in overcoming the size limitations imposed on Lambda functions which not only allows us to work around these constraints but also contributes to the improvement and maintenance of our code.""This product is easy to use.""The solution is highly scalable.""The initial setup of AWS Lambda is very straightforward and quick.""Provides a good, easy path from when you're using an AWS cluster.""The ease and speed of developing the services using any available language is the most valuable feature.""We have no issues with the technical support."

More AWS Lambda Pros →

Cons
"We've had problems using a Python process to try to access something in a large volume of data. It crashes if somebody gives me the wrong code because it cannot handle a large volume of data.""If you have a Spark session in the background, sometimes it's very hard to kill these sessions because of D allocation.""We are building our own queries on Spark, and it can be improved in terms of query handling.""The product could improve the user interface and make it easier for new users.""At the initial stage, the product provides no container logs to check the activity.""The solution needs to optimize shuffling between workers.""Apache Spark could potentially improve in terms of user-friendliness, particularly for individuals with a SQL background. While it's suitable for those with programming knowledge, making it more accessible to those without extensive programming skills could be beneficial.""The solution must improve its performance."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The feature to attach external storage, such as an S3 or elastic storage, must be added to AWS Lambda. This is its area for improvement.""If you're running a new application with a significant load, you need to be prepared for potential bottlenecks.""I would like to see more integration with other platforms.""Its price should be improved. Its pricing is on the higher side. I am not sure if it currently supports the Go language. If it doesn't support the Go language, they can introduce it.""We don't have the inbuilt modules in AWS Lambda. If more modules were built into or integrated with AWS Lambda, that would help developers to code.""I think that perhaps Lambda could explore its functionality more.""They should work on the solution's stability and pricing.""I want to see support for longer applications. I need the 15-minute time-out window to improve."

More AWS Lambda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AWS is slightly more expensive than Azure."
  • "Its pricing is on the higher side."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable and it is a pay-per-use model. It is very good for cost optimization."
  • "The cost is based on runtime."
  • "The fees are volume-based."
  • "AWS Lambda is inexpensive."
  • "Lambda is a good and cheap solution and I would recommend it to those without a huge payload."
  • "For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
  • More AWS Lambda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use… more »
    Top Answer:The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.
    Top Answer:We only need to pay for the compute time our code consumes. The solution does not cost much.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,893
    Comparisons
    2,256
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    1st
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    11,937
    Comparisons
    8,175
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    391
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Spring Boot logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Spark SQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Apache NiFi logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    Apache NiFi logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AWS Fargate logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Google Cloud Dataflow logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    AWS Lambda is a compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda executes your code only when needed and scales automatically, from a few requests per day to thousands per second. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. With AWS Lambda, you can run code for virtually any type of application or backend service - all with zero administration. AWS Lambda runs your code on a high-availability compute infrastructure and performs all of the administration of the compute resources, including server and operating system maintenance, capacity provisioning and automatic scaling, code monitoring and logging. All you need to do is supply your code in one of the languages that AWS Lambda supports (currently Node.js, Java, C# and Python).

    You can use AWS Lambda to run your code in response to events, such as changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket or an Amazon DynamoDB table; to run your code in response to HTTP requests using Amazon API Gateway; or invoke your code using API calls made using AWS SDKs. With these capabilities, you can use Lambda to easily build data processing triggers for AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon DynamoDB process streaming data stored in Amazon Kinesis, or create your own back end that operates at AWS scale, performance, and security.

    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Netflix
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government5%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization48%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise38%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Lambda vs. Apache Spark
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lambda vs. Apache Spark and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 5th in Compute Service with 60 reviews while AWS Lambda is ranked 1st in Compute Service with 70 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while AWS Lambda is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Lambda writes "An easily scalable solution with a variety of use cases and valuable event-based triggers". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Apache NiFi, whereas AWS Lambda is most compared with AWS Batch, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, Apache NiFi, AWS Fargate and Google Cloud Dataflow. See our AWS Lambda vs. Apache Spark report.

    See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.