Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Spark vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark
Ranking in Java Frameworks
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (1st), Compute Service (4th)
Spring Boot
Ranking in Java Frameworks
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Apache Spark is 6.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 42.3%, down from 43.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

MT
Aug 28, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

SurjitChoudhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers batch processing of data and in-memory processing in Spark greatly enhances performance
Spark supports real-time data processing through Spark Streaming. It allows for batch processing of data. If you have immediate data, like chat information, that needs to be processed in real-time, Spark Streaming is used. For data that can be evaluated later, batch processing with Apache Spark is suitable. Mostly, batch processing is utilized in our organization, but for streaming data processing, tools like Kafka are often integrated. In-memory processing in Spark greatly enhances performance, making it a hundred times faster than the previous MapReduce methods. This improvement is achieved through optimization techniques like caching, broadcasting, and partitioning, which help in optimizing queries for faster processing.
RakeshPatel2 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need.
Spring Boot could improve its integration with the major cloud providers. Connectivity with cloud solutions isn't easy compared to other frameworks like Django and Python. I need to connect to GCP, so I would like to have one simple dependency that I can include to immediately connect to GCP, so I don't need to go through all the configuration steps.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most significant advantage of Spark 3.0 is its support for DataFrame UDF Pandas UDF features."
"The processing time is very much improved over the data warehouse solution that we were using."
"Apache Spark provides a very high-quality implementation of distributed data processing."
"The distribution of tasks, like the seamless map-reduce functionality, is quite impressive."
"Provides a lot of good documentation compared to other solutions."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its speed and efficiency. It's much faster than other tools and excels in parallel data processing. Unlike tools like Python or JavaScript, which may struggle with parallel processing, it allows us to handle large volumes of data with more power easily."
"The most crucial feature for us is the streaming capability. It serves as a fundamental aspect that allows us to exert control over our operations."
"The fault tolerant feature is provided."
"The setup is straightforward."
"Spring Boot provides an all-in-one solution for the libraries needed to create a Win app. It covers all the aspects, including validation, security, etc. It provides all those features out-of-the-box. You can do almost everything with Spring Boot."
"It's easy to set up the solution."
"The setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use; I primarily employ integrated templates such as the REST template."
"The cloud version is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is all the interactions to various applications happen using Spring Boot."
"It is stable."
 

Cons

"Stability in terms of API (things were difficult, when transitioning from RDD to DataFrames, then to DataSet)."
"If you have a Spark session in the background, sometimes it's very hard to kill these sessions because of D allocation."
"I know there is always discussion about which language to write applications in and some people do love Scala. However, I don't like it."
"It would be beneficial to enhance Spark's capabilities by incorporating models that utilize features not traditionally present in its framework."
"Apache Spark is very difficult to use. It would require a data engineer. It is not available for every engineer today because they need to understand the different concepts of Spark, which is very, very difficult and it is not easy to learn."
"Apache Spark should add some resource management improvements to the algorithms."
"Apart from the restrictions that come with its in-memory implementation. It has been improved significantly up to version 3.0, which is currently in use."
"The setup I worked on was really complex."
"Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS."
"The tool's documentation could be improved, especially by tying it back to frequently asked questions and issues users have. A feedback loop in which the documentation targets the most commonly asked user questions would make using the solution easier. Essentially, I want a more user-centered approach to documentation rather than a purely technical focus."
"Spring Boot can improve the dependency tree that we use for libraries. It would be helpful if it was less complex."
"The cross framework compatibility has some shortcomings. With JUnit Test Runner and Spring Boot, it's really tedious to make them both work to write the test cases."
"The product could be improved by supporting and integrating Hadoop."
"When the dependencies within those starter packages clash, mismatch or have a hazard, it is hard to solve the issue."
"This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."
"Spring Boot's cost could be cheaper."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
"The product is expensive, considering the setup."
"It is quite expensive. In fact, it accounts for almost 50% of the cost of our entire project."
"They provide an open-source license for the on-premise version."
"Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
"Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
"Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
"The tool is an open-source product. If you're using the open-source Apache Spark, no fees are involved at any time. Charges only come into play when using it with other services like Databricks."
"Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
"This is an open source solution."
"This solution is free unless you apply for support."
"It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
"As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
"I am using a free version of Spring Boot."
"If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
"The solution is an open-source tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark?
We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?
Compared to other solutions like Doc DB, Spark is more costly due to the need for extensive infrastructure. It requires significant investment in infrastructure, which can be expensive. While cloud...
What needs improvement with Apache Spark?
The main concern is the overhead of Java when distributed processing is not necessary. In such cases, operations can often be done on one node, making Spark's distributed mode unnecessary. Conseque...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.