Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Eclipse Foundation and VMware are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Eclipse Foundation is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.0, while VMware is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Eclipse Foundation holds a 15.4% mindshare in JF, compared to VMware’s 41.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Eclipse Foundation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Jakarta EE

Read 3 Jakarta EE reviews

6,212 Views
5,066 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Spring Boot

Read 38 Spring Boot reviews

14,362 Views
10,483 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Jakarta EE

Spring Boot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Spring Boot and Jakarta EE compete in building Java applications. Spring Boot seems to have the upper hand for developers seeking ease and speed, while Jakarta EE stands out for enterprise grade robustness.

Features: Spring Boot streamlines development with extensive libraries, simplified configuration, and efficient microservices architecture, integrating well within the Spring ecosystem. Jakarta EE offers a comprehensive suite of enterprise features, focusing on robust and scalable backend systems through standardized technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Boot is known for its fast deployment model using embedded servers and lightweight apps conducive to cloud integration. Jakarta EE requires traditional deployment with application servers, noted for complexity. Spring Boot's community-driven support provides agile service, contrasting with Jakarta EE's enterprise-centric approach.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot typically incurs lower setup costs due to its open-source framework, enabling higher ROI through cost efficiency and reduced development time. Jakarta EE may involve greater initial investments in licensing and infrastructure, appealing to those valuing long-term scalability and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE

Ranking in Java Frameworks

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Boot

Ranking in Java Frameworks

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 15.4%, down from 22.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 41.6%, down from 43.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks

Q&A Highlights

Netanya Carmi

Content Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 29, 2021

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve

When running applications in the cloud, scalability is highly dependent on how you configure it. Factors such as the number of instances you want to scale, and the threshold for scaling based on the quantity of messages or the amount of data, are all customizable based on your application's needs.

Read full review

RajuGottupalli

Chief architect at Mphasis

Minimizes a lot of coding, improves the time to market, and is easily deployable and configurable

Spring Boot is a bounded framework. The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices. To avoid this problem, we have to make the service a reactive session. It has to be reactive to a particular load, particular condition, or based on the number of requests hitting the particular service. All these factors make the service a reactor. There's another module in which Spring Boot provides spring reflex. This module enables the reactiveness of the service, meaning that it eliminates the blocking and waiting state. For example, if you're sending a get operation or a post operation, there won't be any waiting for it to actually hit that particular network to get the data from another service. It continuously flows the request, and there is a zero waiting pack. Vert.x is another good framework where there are similar features or similar benefits with having a reactive session. Spring Boot is a license resource, so it's a framework where we can customize our solution or a particular requirement to build a good solution using Spring Boot. But it's an opinionated framework, meaning that it's completely bounded. You have only one direction to find a solution, whereas Vert.x is an unopinionated framework. Unopinionated is a kind of a toolkit where you can have more optimization and a more flexible solution, which is suitable to your requirements. In Spring Boot, the opportunities are limited. With Vert.x and other programming tools, we have multiple options to explore the solution in a different way and achieve a nonfunctional requirement of thousands transactions in a second. Spring Boot might not support this kind of non-functional requirement. Vert.X is a very good solution to solve critical NFRs for a particular application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."

"Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated."

"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration."

"It's easy to set up the solution."

"It is a stable solution."

"It gives you confidence in a readily available platform."

"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is the microservices and change information. Additionally, there are plenty of features."

"We like that it is an open-source tool."

"This solution is really user friendly. In terms of prototyping, it's really fast to build the applications we want to test to complete a proof of concept."

More Spring Boot pros

Cons

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS."

"The current state of Spring Boot's cloud layer requires further development, especially for collecting Java functions for cloud platforms like GCP Cloudground. Having to write every single API request in a single class can be a cumbersome and time-consuming task that is not ideal for Java developers. Additionally, having all API calls in one class and making it the main class presents problems with package visibility. Therefore, there is much room for improvement in the Spring Cloud area."

"The cloud packaging is not very straightforward."

"We have specific algorithms for our Load Balancer or API gateway. So those things, if they could make it more precise, that would be beneficial. Sometimes when we are under pressure or any new person who looks into that stuff, we'll get confused or scared because of some difficulties in understanding Which algorithm needs to be used to implement a Load Balancer. When when we Yeah. Because when we say circuit breaker, we need to use it, and then the user gets a blank circuit breaker. This means we are saying the circuit breaker needs to be moved, and then that circuit breaker needs to be elaborated more. What type of algorithm should I do, and what exactly do I need to get done so that this circuit breaker can help me to resolve my issue? Because, you know, because if you go for the circuit breaker, it will ask to open the new tab, you know, since it will check. If the service is not responding, it will wait and go for another connection. So in similar words, if they can explain it a bit more, that will be helpful. Everyone could do their own Google stuff, and they will get it, but they need help understanding how this could help them to resolve the issue. It will be good if Spring Boot provides information about real-time use cases."

"Building a new product in Spring Boot can take a long time since the solution uses reflection. This is one area the solution could be improved."

"This is a really good solution for me and I can't think of anything that can be improved."

"It needs more applicable control for large-scale application development."

"The database connectivity could be better in terms of dealing with multi-tenant systems."

More Spring Boot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."

"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."

"I am using a free version of Spring Boot."

"If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."

"This solution is free unless you apply for support."

"I use the free version of Spring Boot."

"This is an open-source product."

"The solution is an open-source tool."

"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."

More Spring Boot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

See all answers

What do you like most about Jakarta EE?

Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jakarta EE?

Enhancements in configurations can be achieved by benchmarking against Spring Boot technology. It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spring Boot?

1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?

Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring Boot?

I use the free version of Spring Boot.

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring MVC vs Jakarta EE

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Jakarta EE

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Jakarta EE

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Spark vs Jakarta EE

Compared 3% of the time

Vert.x vs Jakarta EE

Compared 3% of the time

More Jakarta EE Competitors

Open Liberty vs Spring Boot

Compared 25% of the time

Helidon vs Spring Boot

Compared 17% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring Boot

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring Boot

Compared 10% of the time

Vert.x vs Spring Boot

Compared 7% of the time

More Spring Boot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

March 2025

Download Jakarta EE product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Boot

March 2025

Download Spring Boot product report

Overview

Jakarta EE is a powerful platform for developing enterprise-level Java applications. It provides a set of specifications and APIs that enable developers to build scalable, secure, and portable applications. Jakarta EE is built on the foundation of Java EE, which has been widely adopted by organizations around the world.

One of the key features of Jakarta EE is its support for distributed computing. It includes APIs for building distributed applications, such as remote method invocation (RMI) and message-driven beans. This allows developers to create applications that can run on multiple servers and communicate with each other seamlessly.

Another important aspect of Jakarta EE is its focus on security. It provides a comprehensive set of security APIs and features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption. This ensures that applications built with Jakarta EE are robust and protected against potential security threats.

Portability is also a major advantage of Jakarta EE. It allows developers to write applications that can run on any Jakarta EE-compliant server, regardless of the underlying operating system or hardware. This makes it easier to deploy and maintain applications across different environments.

In addition, Jakarta EE offers a wide range of APIs and specifications for various enterprise-level services, such as database access, messaging, and web services. This simplifies the development process and allows developers to focus on building business logic rather than dealing with low-level details.

Eclipse Foundation

Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.
Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.
Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

Reviews from Real Users

Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

VMware

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

March 2025

Free Report: Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot report.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.