My company uses the solution as an Edge firewall and East-West firewall.
IT Network Manager at a analyst firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Works as an Edge firewall and East-West firewall but improvement is needed in the consolidated UI
Pros and Cons
- "The tool's most valuable feature is its management console."
- "Check Point CloudGuard Network Security needs to improve the management of the actual firewalls. Improvement is also needed for the consolidated UI of different security aspects."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The tool's most valuable feature is its management console.
What needs improvement?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security needs to improve the management of the actual firewalls. Improvement is also needed for the consolidated UI of different security aspects.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for a year and a half. My company has been using it for eight years.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We recently had some issues with stability, so it's hit or miss. It seems to have more minor bugs than other platforms, but overall stability is the same.
How are customer service and support?
The speed of the support's response varies. Sometimes, you can get a good engineer who can give you the right answers.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto, and SonicWall. The worst ones on the list are Cisco, Fortinet, and SonicWall. Palo Alto is better in some areas. Check PointCloudGuard Network Security is top in terms of actual security. But in terms of managing the whole platform, I would put it below Palo Alto.
How was the initial setup?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is easy and takes two hours to complete.
What about the implementation team?
I did the solution's deployment myself. However, I connected with the consultants whenever needed.
What was our ROI?
We've been secure and haven't had any security breaches.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool's pricing is been higher than other solutions, but it seems like it's turning downwards.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Software Development and Information Security Manager at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Makes policy management easy and helps to improve security score and uptime
Pros and Cons
- "The easy management of the policies is great for us because we are a small team and having easy management is great and useful for us."
- "At CPX, we heard that we can see all the things on the same platform. That is what we have been asking for, and hopefully, we are going to start seeing it this year."
What is our primary use case?
We use it to analyze all the traffic in our network. It is the main tool for security services and networking in our company.
How has it helped my organization?
We increased our security score by introducing the tool. We are continuing to grow and improve. In terms of policies, we have a lot of benefits in terms of the security cluster and how it works.
CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid-clouds as well as on-prem. We have a hybrid scenario in the company. We have 3% of services in the cloud, and we can use the same clusters and the same policies that we have on the on-premise side for our cloud services. We have the same benefits for both.
We are pretty confident in our cloud network security using CloudGuard Network Security. We are not exactly an Internet-exposure company, but we have a cloud setup. We are pretty confident with its configuration assessment. With Check Point as our partners, we are protected, and we can be confident in our security.
What is most valuable?
Microsegmentation is very useful for us because we minimize the surface attack. The easy management of the policies is great for us because we are a small team and having easy management is great and useful for us.
What needs improvement?
At this point, we are very happy with what is happening with their horizon. At CPX, we heard that we can see all the things on the same platform. That is what we have been asking for, and hopefully, we are going to start seeing it this year.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CloudGuard Network Security since 2020.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. I cannot remember a time when we had any issues with it. Our operations are 24/7.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. We do not have any problems with it.
How are customer service and support?
We have had a good experience with the support and customer service, and we are happy with them.
I would rate them a nine out of ten. A unique issue that we have is related to the language. When the first level of support cannot resolve an issue and the issue needs to be escalated, we have a language challenge because the team is based in India. There are some limitations on both ends.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used our cloud vendor's security but did not get as many details when we had any issues. We immediately moved to Check Point, and we are more confident of Check Point.
At first, we used Azure and Defender, and before we changed to CheckPoint, we used ESET. So, we had ESET and then we started rolling out Check Point. We had a mix with the cloud vendor solution, and then we went for Check Point.
How was the initial setup?
We have a mix of on-premises and cloud. We use the Infinity services.
My team deployed it. I have three security engineers on the team, and with the help of Check Point, we deployed it. We upgraded very recently in December, and it was a good experience. It has been running well.
What about the implementation team?
We used the services of a company based in Panama. With the Infinity contract, we had some professional time with Check Point, and they helped us set up some of the things. They reviewed some of the things that we deployed, so we have all the best practices.
What was our ROI?
I do not have a lot of details on that, but our uptime is pretty high.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is an expensive product, but when you realize that you need it, it does not feel so expensive.
We have had a good experience with them as partners. They have helped us with designing and having good architecture and the best equipment at the best prices. We find it a good deal.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Microsoft's security suite. The thing that made us decide on Check Point was that Check Point had the least zero-day attack score. We have a lot of solutions from Check Point, and we stayed with Check Point.
We are now not evaluating other solutions because, since 2020, we have chosen Check Point as our partner. It continues to be the best solution for us to improve our score. We are not looking for software solutions from other vendors.
We always keep track of the service and the score, and with Check Point, there has always been the highest score.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate CloudGuard Network Security a ten out of ten. We are happy with the uptime and management. It is a good tool, and it provides a lot of value for us. We are happy.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Lead Security Analyst at BH Telecom
Comes with threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade features
Pros and Cons
- "The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network."
- "CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper."
What is our primary use case?
The solution helps to protect our customers at the perimeter. We have integrated the solution into our NSX environment.
What is most valuable?
The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network.
We can confidently assert that we are among the top cloud providers, protecting our customers from external threats. With Check Point's CloudGuard Network Security, we offer attack services protection.
What needs improvement?
CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security is highly scalable in our virtual environment. We can easily add more ports, and it functions perfectly. We use it in cluster mode, deploying multiple Check Point clusters horizontally and vertically, making scalability easy and excellent.
How are customer service and support?
I find Check Point's technical support to be excellent. We have premium support, and whenever we open a case, especially for high-severity issues, we receive a phone call from their support team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is expensive but also valuable.
What other advice do I have?
CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-premises environments. It helps to manage everything from a single point.
I have been exploring Harmony SASE for remote security and zero-trust access in some proof-of-concept activities. Also, I'm checking out the CloudGuard Web Application Firewall for safeguarding our applications on the internet.
I rate the product a ten out of ten. We have had a great experience with Check Point, and we haven't faced any major incidents or attacks compromising our organization. It has helped us detect activities on our endpoints.
I would genuinely recommend it. Check Point is easy to manage, implement, and configure. The support is excellent, and the constant threat intelligence updates ensure protection against various threats. It's truly an amazing product for securing your environment.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Principle Network and Security Consultant at Vodafone Global Enterprise
Feature-rich with good threat prevention and protection
Pros and Cons
- "Identity awareness, URL filtering, IDS, DLP, Content Filtering, VPN, and Application Control are all excellent."
- "Check Point has a history of moving fast with software release and upgrade cycles which are difficult to keep up with at times."
What is our primary use case?
We use Check Point firewalls and SMS servers in on-prem DC and in multi-cloud environments extensively. These are used to protect the perimeter, DMZ, and internal network to protect and inspect network traffic.
The firewalls are best of breed and provide extensive rich features and a diverse range of protection against DDoS, malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. Also, it is used for terminating client and mobile VPN tunnels, URL filtering, IDP, DLP, etc.
The environment is Internal and a multi-tenant hosted for external clients which is a complex setup.
How has it helped my organization?
The new Check Point firewalls are best-of-breed and provide next-gen firewall features with AI and ML capabilities. This helps to reduce the operational support overhead and protects against new emerging threats.
Previously we used Juniper, Cisco, and other firewall platforms which have very limited capabilities and offer no inspection or threat-prevention features at all.
Check Point has changed this dynamic completely and offers a complete security solution to protect all digital assets which is immensely helpful.
What is most valuable?
Identity awareness, URL filtering, IDS, DLP, Content Filtering, VPN, and Application Control are all excellent. They provide features to inspect internet traffic, data protection compliance, and DDoS attack detection and protection.
The Check Point firewall product that we picked up has an excellent feature set and all the required licenses, it's a nicely engineered firewall technology and has a great support team to escalate.
Features like threat prevention and protection are good to have to protect against zero-day attacks, malware, and ransomware.
What needs improvement?
Software bugs and OS releases can be very fast to keep up with. Check Point has a history of moving fast with software release and upgrade cycles which are difficult to keep up with at times.
New features should have a single-pane-of-glass view for on-prem DC and cloud environments.
Licensing costs are very high compared to other vendors. Check Point needs to be competitive to keep the cost down for the customers and partners.
The previous Check Point OS model had to support multiple OSs which was difficult and cumbersome (i.e. SPLAT, IPSO, GAIA).
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for ten years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did use a different solution and wanted to have better security capability and visibility.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is expensive but feature-rich.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at other options and checked if the firewalls had all the security and compliance features required by the organization.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network security engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Automation and APIs streamline integration and boost confidence in cloud deployments
Pros and Cons
- "It gives us more confidence in secure cloud deployments."
- "The most valuable feature is the automation and the APIs, making our life much easier for integration."
- "Better documentation would be welcome."
- "Better documentation would be welcome."
What is our primary use case?
Most people ask me to integrate with Point CloudGuard and SecureNet Network. One big client wanted to move his on-prem data center to CloudGuard Azure, and I provided the CloudGuard Network Security Solution for him. His data center was also rendering to our clients, so it was messy. However, it gave them more confidence in Security CloudGuard deployments and integrations. It was quite easy with Terraform, resulting in a very easy deployment.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the automation and the APIs, making our life much easier for integration. Check Point has excellent, very useful tools to help us with the poster and to see if we're passing the grade.
It gives us more confidence in secure cloud deployments. The network security was very easy to migrate. We did it with Terraform. I just filled in the blanks and Terraform did everything else.
Check Point CloudGuard NetWork Security provides unified security across hybrid clouds as well as on-prem. It's more or less the same across deployments.
Check Point helps companies with their security posture. It has useful tools to help with this aspect to improve security.
What needs improvement?
I'm not sure if I have the experience to discuss improvements.
The deployments can be difficult if a person doesn't know what they are doing.
Better documentation would be welcome.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for a bit over a year. It has been one year and four months or something like that.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
So far, I haven't had any stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I haven't had any experience with scaling problems. I didn't need to scale up for my client or use automated scaling.
How are customer service and support?
Support were very helpful. They usually respond quite fast, and they are very knowledgeable about what they do. When we have a problem, we can solve it immediately, and sometimes a one-on-one meeting can be very insightful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I didn't use other vendors since I specifically handle Check Point in my company.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. First, I speak with the client to understand everything he needs, his current deployment, and how it's done. In the meantime, we can see if there are improvements or small tweaks needed. Then, I deploy in a test environment to ensure everything works without conflicts. Finally, we do a test with Check Point - not a full deployment on the production side. If everything works in the test, we start migrating slowly to the production side. Implementation usually takes one to two weeks.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment could be done with one person if the person knows what they're doing. It iss very easy. Someone who is not familiar with CloudGuard and cloud solutions might find themselves a bit lost with too much information and not knowing where to look.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't have insights on the list price.
What other advice do I have?
I would give an eight out of ten for the overall product rating.
I'm a Check Point distributor, mainly.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Distributor and Integrator
Last updated: Feb 23, 2025
Flag as inappropriateNetwork Security Engineer at Cielo
Protects very well against advanced threats and covers all features under one license
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature for me is that you have just one license. You can test and implement everything you need with one license. You do not need to pay for separate module licenses when you want IPS or other features."
- "We faced issues while upgrading our CloudGuard Network Gateway. When we tried to use the template that Check Point offers on their site, it was not available for the second to the latest version, so I was forced to upgrade my management server. That was very challenging for us."
What is our primary use case?
We are using CloudGuard Network Security to protect North-South traffic or VPCs. We are using the CloudGuard firewall between the Internet and VPCs. All the traffic needs to pass through the firewall.
How has it helped my organization?
CloudGuard Network Security provides features, such as threat emulation, that native cloud solutions do not offer. AWS, Azure, and GCP have a lot of features, but you sometimes need to pay charges for specific features. With Check Point products, you have all these features in one license. You pay once and you can use everything.
CloudGuard Network Security improves our security against advanced threats. Others do not offer features like threat emulation out of the box. CloudGuard Network Security protects very well against advanced threats.
We have a high level of confidence in our cloud network security by using CloudGuard Network Security. The product is similar to what we use in traditional data centers. The infrastructure is almost the same. The way to manage the policies is the same. It is very easy to implement and manage CloudGuard networks. There is some difference when you are using auto-provision, but in the end, it is the same technology. It is easy for a traditional network engineer to work with CloudGuard.
We did not go for the cloud vendor's cloud firewall because we wanted to be able to manage all the firewalls, policies, and other things from a single point.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature for me is that you have just one license. You can test and implement everything you need with one license. You do not need to pay for separate module licenses when you want IPS or other features. The license includes everything that you need.
What needs improvement?
The version upgrades need improvement. We faced issues while upgrading our CloudGuard Network Gateway. When we tried to use the template that Check Point offers on their site, it was not available for the second to the latest version, so I was forced to upgrade my management server. That was very challenging for us.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for 8 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I cannot remember the last time I had an issue. It is stable, but every product has a few bugs. If you maintain the configuration and the versions, everything is fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We do not have any problems because we can use the auto-provision templates. If I need to scale up or scale down, I can do this. If there is any issue, it is very transparent. For example, if I lose my gateway, the manager will automatically create a gateway and bring everything up.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is very good. Their response is fast. You can contact an engineer in a few minutes, but it depends on the severity of the issue. In the case of a high-severity issue, you can talk to an engineer to assist you with an issue.
Compared to other vendors our company has been working with, Check Point has better support. They have the best technical staff.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We only use Check Point products. In our data center, we are only using CloudGuard.
How was the initial setup?
It is very easy. With a few clicks, you can implement your firewall.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is fair. Its license covers all the features. There is a cost-benefit. The licensing for the cloud is better than on-premises because, with on-premises, you have to pay separately for different things.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate CloudGuard Network Security a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Sr Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Protects network security with threat detection
Pros and Cons
- "The solution helps protect network security by offering threat prevention, addressing vulnerabilities, and utilizing blades."
- "We utilize logging systems, and geolocation is crucial for us as some applications must only be accessible from our country. However, there have been occasional issues with this feature."
What is our primary use case?
The solution helps protect network security by offering threat prevention, addressing vulnerabilities, and utilizing blades.
We use it for the protection of our internal services. We're a Telco company, our internal users are on the machines. We also have some external services that we protect. We protect our customers and our public cloud with it.
VMware is our public cloud provider.
How has it helped my organization?
Threat prevention is the biggest benefit we see from it.
What is most valuable?
The network security is the most valuable aspect of CloudGuard. I am a network engineer so it's the most relevant feature to me.
CloudGuard Network Security provides us with unified security management across hybrid-clouds and on-prem. We manage all of those environments through this one solution.
It's user-friendly. It's a multi-domain solution. CloudGuard is really, really good.
I have experience with FortiGate and Cisco. I worked with them at previous jobs. FortiGate is easy and user-friendly when it comes to the configuration, but it is unstable in some countries and the routing tables have problems. The configuration of the network is in the same management platform, which might be better for some.
In comparison, CloudGaurd is very stable.
Cisco is hard to use, FortiGate is easy and CloudGuard is somewhere in the middle when it comes to ease of use.
When it comes to identifying security threats, CloudGuard is really good compared to its competition.
I am confident that CloudGuard's Network Security can protect us. It enables me to sleep very well at night.
What needs improvement?
We utilize logging systems, and geolocation is crucial for us as some applications must only be accessible from our country. However, there have been occasional issues with this feature. It drops requests. It's not always precise.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for two years.
My team has been using it for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 28 licenses. We have 800 servers on our private cloud.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is fast. They answer quickly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
We integrate with NSX. The setup wasn't hard.
What was our ROI?
We have seen ROI. It saves us time because it's stable. It's easily administered. We have time to do other tasks. It is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licensing is complicated. When a license expires, we have to renew it and the process is complicated. They should make the process easier.
What other advice do I have?
Using CloudGuard Network Security saves time due to its stability and ease of administration. The solution is not complex, allowing administrators to focus on other tasks. The configuration process is straightforward. It can integrate with NSX.
I rate the product a nine out of ten. We manage a total of 800 servers that host a variety of components, including our infrastructure, customer applications, databases, application sites, and disaster recovery systems
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Cloud network engineer at Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
An easy-to-navigate tool useful for filtering internet traffic that needs to improve its deployment speed
Pros and Cons
- "It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible."
- "The deployment phase takes too much time."
What is our primary use case?
In my company, we use the solution just to secure my AWS Network Insights and inside production. We use it for security purposes.
What is most valuable?
With the solution, we just need to filter the traffic coming from the internet and Direct Connect. So it filters the traffic, basically. It permits access. In short, it just filters the traffic and permits the traffic. The aforementioned details are the purposes for which we use the tool.
What needs improvement?
We use the tool as a basic firewall. It's a technical firewall. As a technical firewall, we use SmartConsole or Check Point Firewall.
The deployment phase takes too much time. I would like the deployment to be faster.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for two and a half years. We are using Check Point R80.10 SmartConsole in our organization.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten since it takes too much time for deployment. However, it is flexible since we used to push the policy normally. It takes hardly ten seconds to install the policy. It's much easier.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have been using the solution in my company for the last year. Other than the employees in my company, more than 25,000 users are using the solution hosted on AWS.
Basically, the application, which is hosted, is used internally. It's the same user account because it's not exposed anywhere on the internet. If anyone wants to access the solution from the internet, the traffic comes from Direct Connect, and from Direct Connect, it goes to AWS.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was not much complex. The setup phase was good enough to be able to navigate through it.
It took a long time to deploy it. We need to run this on EC2 instances, so it took almost two hours to deploy the solution. After deploying the solution slowly, and gradually, we have to push the policy on the firewall. It takes time to deploy, but it's a stable one.
The solution is deployed on the cloud. It's a software we install in EC2 instances on AWS, which we use as a firewall.
We currently have six to seven resources managing the deployments and maintenance.
What about the implementation team?
During deployment, we took technical help from Check Point.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Product Categories
Firewalls Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Cloud and Data Center Security WAN Edge Unified Threat Management (UTM)Popular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Netgate pfSense
Cisco Secure Firewall
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
Check Point NGFW
WatchGuard Firebox
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- We're trying to choose between Fortinet or Checkpoint UTM firewalls. Can you help?
- Is Check Point's software compatible with other products?
- What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
- When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cyberoam or Fortinet?
- Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?
- If you could go back, would you change your decision to buy that firewall and why?