We offer a full security and connectivity solution leveraging SD-WAN and SASE technologies. We partner with service integrators and providers who, in turn, sell the solution to business customers. Our solution is built on SD-WAN and SASE, facilitating the connection of offices and home users to the organization through various WAN connections. By aggregating multiple connections over the Internet, we deliver security and connectivity to meet the needs of retail and finance. We can help any vertical that needs a connection between the branch and the cloud.
EVP, chief product and revenue officer at BBT.live
Has features like next-generation firewall features, including anti-spam, IPS, and URL filtering
Pros and Cons
- "We primarily secure our network using CloudGuard Network Security's next-generation firewall features, including anti-spam, IPS, and URL filtering. Our chosen package for the go-to-market strategy is NGTP. For customers seeking more features, we provide options to upgrade to the tool's advanced packages."
- "The product needs to offer multi-tenancy."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
We primarily secure our network using CloudGuard Network Security's next-generation firewall features, including anti-spam, IPS, and URL filtering. Our chosen package for the go-to-market strategy is NGTP. For customers seeking more features, we provide options to upgrade to the tool's advanced packages.
The product serves as a complement to our solution. While we integrate some firewall functionality into our edge device, we do not develop complete security solutions for the cloud. The combination of CloudGuard Network Security with SD-WAN connectivity allows us to offer a holistic solution.
What needs improvement?
The product needs to offer multi-tenancy.
For how long have I used the solution?
Eight months ago, we initiated the integration with CloudGuard Network Security, and currently, we are taking it to the market and presenting it to customers. We have three customers who are on the verge of signing agreements with us.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
Currently, the technical support we receive is from the US. While there is a team in the US supporting us, there is a need for this support to extend to other regions.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We got discounts on pricing.
What other advice do I have?
We utilize the tool's SmartConsole integrated into our management system. However, we encounter challenges with multi-tenancy. Since we integrate it as an application on the cloud we can integrate it with any other provider. We do think that the synergy with Check Point is very good because we also allow Check Point to move from the edge to the cloud while we provide security connectivity from the edge to the cloud. So we can support its transition from on-prem security solutions to the cloud. It looks like a very good win-win situation for both Check Point and BBT, and we see it in the market, bringing us big deals in Japan and France.
We can go with others as well in terms of architecture because our architecture is very open. We are a small company and cannot engage with everyone. We have good connections with Check Point in Israel. We also have some connections abroad. So far, we are getting good support.
We have an application that is running on our cloud. Normally, our main cloud provider is Google, but we can run over any cloud. It could be a private cloud or any data center that provides virtual machines and connectivity. We are agnostic.
We are in several POCs in France, Japan, and Thailand, and they are progressing well. However, we need more presales support. There is a lack of knowledge about the solution in the regions, and we are finding it challenging to get sufficient support from those regions. There seems to be a gap in support that needs to be addressed.
It seems that the product is the answer that we need. We haven't identified any missing components in the security suite, apart from the operational challenges related to working in a multi-tenancy environment. I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Consultant at ITQS
Easy to manage and implement with simple configuration capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "One of the main characteristics that Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has given us is granularity and visibility."
- "It is somewhat problematic in the area of the cloud."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security helps resolve potential regulatory and compliance issues when moving to the cloud. The high-visibility rule base's granular approach helps us with potential security leaks and highlights items to focus on for immediate action.
The functionality that we're using it for is the cloud firewall piece.
For this reason, it was necessary to implement this tool in our organization and the results have been very positive, providing the necessary security throughout the infrastructure.
How has it helped my organization?
One of the main characteristics that Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has given us is granularity and visibility. The data that enters our Azure environment integrates in a great way in the cloud and in on-premises. This is important for the alerts and the response to incidents that arise in our platform in the cloud, for the moment, we are very satisfied to have acquired this solution and to have implemented it in the cloud and with other systems on-premise that have given us a lot of security and peace of mind.
What is most valuable?
One of the features that I liked the most and that I feel is very useful is auto-scaling. Our Azure cloud environment is constantly growing and this allows us to expand as well.
Another very accurate feature is CloudGuard's malware prevention and exploit resistance rate and they have given us a lot of security since the database is very large.
It is easy to manage CloudGuard from on-premises and offers the same protection as we can provide to the rest of our environments, which is a great advantage for us.
What needs improvement?
One of the areas that should be improved is the updates of the products. It is somewhat problematic in the area of the cloud. In the case of migration from on-premise to the cloud, it is difficult to replace the licenses. It should be something very transparent and thus save us the time to go to support but in general, the tool is shared very well in security and protection of privacy and if they are lucky they can add more features that help us our security would be great they should always be one step ahead of cyberattacks.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have implemented it two year ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security maintains very good stability, and, best of all, maintains excellent compatibility with Azure.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is great. You can make a network scale up or down. This allows you to have good control of bandwidth in the organization or to be able to distribute it in the different departments of the company.
How are customer service and support?
Currently, since the implementation, not much support has been used, therefore, I rate it as excellent.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
The Check Point brand has always been used in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
The configuration was very simple since the tool and the wizard are very interactive and user-friendly. It was not very difficult to do the installation and configuration.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation started with a vendor and the IT team. The engineer that worked with us presented great knowledge of the product.
What was our ROI?
By using a tool of this type, the cost of personnel decreases since the tool performs quite well with the functions that it was designed for.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price and the licenses have been good. They maintain a competitive price with the other companies.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Other options were not evaluated as we like to keep the same brand across solutions.
What other advice do I have?
When doing a cloud deployment, remember you are doing this in the cloud so treat it like a cloud device, as good configuration brings good results.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Director comercial at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Provides the ability to manage the entire solution consistently and easy to deploy
Pros and Cons
- "CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-prem. It's very important because when I have unified security, I have better control of the situation. If there's an attack or something like that, we can react faster. It's easier for everyone in the organization to work with the Infinity platform."
- "It needs to cover additional kinds of infrastructure, like containers and serverless options. It's somewhat limited in that area."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for security in public cloud implementations, specifically in AWS and Azure.
How has it helped my organization?
For my customer's organization, it's important because they can work with the same kind of solution. They don't need many different solutions in many different use cases. And then they have better management of the solution in general.
CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-prem. It's very important because when I have unified security, I have better control of the situation.
If there's an attack or something like that, we can react faster. It's easier for everyone in the organization to work with the Infinity platform.
What is most valuable?
The integration in the Infinity portal. It's very important for someone to consider the solution if you need to work through a purchase partner. Because they can manage the entire solution consistently with the on-premise Quantum solution and the cloud solution in Azure or AWS without that integration, it's valuable.
What needs improvement?
It needs to cover additional kinds of infrastructure, like containers and serverless options. It's somewhat limited in that area.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product. I haven't heard any problems or complaints from my customers.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's quite scalable because we scale by compute units. It's very easy for us to make a new deployment.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used to replace cloud-native solutions from Azure directly or AWS. We don't implement those originally.
It's important for us because we have had a lot of traditional customers. Then, it's a good way to extend this security to the new deployments in public clouds. It's very important for us.
Additionally, the customer is going to find another choice in the market.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is fair for most of the customers. We don't find the price excessive. It's okay. We can sell it. It's not really hard.
So, the pricing is good.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend using it.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. It is very good. Because it's very well integrated with the traditional platform, especially the Infinity portal part. The unified security concept is very sound for that.
However, there is always room for improvement, we always have to extend the capabilities to other use cases.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Principal Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Offers advanced threat prevention capabilities, network visibility, and control
Pros and Cons
- "The VPN features in CloudGuard Network Security have been the most valuable for us."
- "In the next release, including VRF support would be highly beneficial."
What is our primary use case?
I use CloudGuard Network Security to enhance our cloud exchange points' security. Our customers can seamlessly connect across multiple clouds within the region, and CloudGuard provides next-generation firewall services to ensure their data and applications are protected.
How has it helped my organization?
CloudGuard Network Security has significantly improved our organization by helping us tap into the Check Point customer market.
What is most valuable?
The VPN features in CloudGuard Network Security have been the most valuable for us. It allows us to scale securely within our infrastructure, providing both strong security and VPN capabilities.
What needs improvement?
In the next release, including VRF support would be highly beneficial. Many customers have been requesting this feature, as it is currently lacking in Check Point's offerings, which can make architectural designs more cumbersome compared to competitors.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with CloudGuard Network Security for two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
As for scalability, it could be even better with VRF support, as it would allow for more efficient scaling without the need to deploy separate firewalls for different workloads.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security has been quite stable.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate technical support for CloudGuard as an eight out of ten.To make it a ten, I would expect more proactive assistance and smoother transitions between support levels.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
When comparing CloudGuard Network Security to other solutions like Fortinet and Palo Alto Firewalls, they are similar in terms of identifying security threats. They all offer robust features such as antivirus, deep packet inspection, and IPS. Some of our customers have transitioned from Palo Alto to Check Point. While I don't have specific reasons, it could be related to factors like pricing.
How was the initial setup?
We deployed it across multiple locations, utilizing AWS for SMS management. The environment was designed to ensure security and privacy, with all deployments being private despite being in the public cloud. Our implementation strategy was flexible, depending on the customer's needs, focusing on workload security first and then gradually migrating workloads. The initial deployment was straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
One significant difference between CloudGuard Network Security and other solutions is the lack of VRF support. This means that when dealing with customers who have multiple segments and exchange points, deploying new firewalls becomes necessary. Competitors' solutions typically include VRF support, making scaling much easier and eliminating the need for additional firewall purchases.
We chose CloudGuard over other vendors because it allows us to provide unified security across multiple cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Unlike native cloud firewalls, CloudGuard offers scalability and the ability to expand across different platforms, meeting our customers' needs for consistent security across diverse cloud environments.
What other advice do I have?
We implemented CloudGuard Network Security to meet our customers' demands for enhanced security features and centralized management. They specifically requested Check Point CloudGuard for its robust capabilities, including SMS and MDS for global management.
Using CloudGuard Duo Security has provided us with the ability to manage globally through MDS, which has been a valuable capability. It is convenient to have multiple pockets of global management from UniFi OS.
We realized the benefits of CloudGuard Duo Security quickly after deployment. Understanding the architecture, especially the MDS setup for higher-level organization control, allowed us to establish multiple pockets of management efficiently.
Unified security management allows us to streamline our security operations significantly. With centralized management through SMS and MDS, we can efficiently oversee not only the firewalls within our cloud exchange points but also on-premises devices, enabling a cohesive and unified security architecture across all environments.
I'm very confident in CloudGuard Network Security because it helps us secure our global network. With CloudGuard, we can set up rules to protect against risks from on-premises traffic and ensure security through various measures like single sign-on integration and VPN restrictions.
CloudGuard Network Security is a great product that fulfills firewall needs effectively and provides detailed insights. However, in multi-segment environments requiring multiple VRFs, it can be cumbersome and costly due to the need for separate firewalls.
The best lesson I have learned from using CloudGuard Network Security is to carefully consider the scalability requirements of each environment. While Check Point offers robust features, the lack of VRF support can lead to increased costs and complexity, especially in multi-segment setups where separate firewalls are needed for each segment.
Overall, I would rate CloudGuard Network Security as an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
It manager at ReportStar Technologies
Appreciate the CME plugin for automatically understanding assets within the cloud
Pros and Cons
- "Customers appreciate the CME plugin for automatically understanding assets within the cloud. This information appears in the manager, allowing users to tag the assets and adjust policies and rules accordingly."
- "People don't know about the tool's features. There's a lack of skill. Users require more knowledge on how to integrate it into the cloud environment and orchestrate routing. So, it's not necessarily a CloudGuard Network Security or Check Point issue but more about integration, knowledge, and understanding."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for the ingress and egress, often for VMSS auto-scaling groups. This involves linking on-premises to the cloud and managing incoming traffic within the same cloud environment.
What is most valuable?
Customers appreciate the CME plugin for automatically understanding assets within the cloud. This information appears in the manager, allowing users to tag the assets and adjust policies and rules accordingly.
The IT personnel who transition from on-premises to the cloud experience the same understanding, knowledge, and comfort with the cloud environment, using the familiar interface they had on-premises.
What needs improvement?
People don't know about the tool's features. There's a lack of skill. Users require more knowledge on how to integrate it into the cloud environment and orchestrate routing. So, it's not necessarily a CloudGuard Network Security or Check Point issue but more about integration, knowledge, and understanding.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product's stability is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability is good.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's support is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool's pricing is good. Customers want it to be cheap. I consider the pricing to be elastic. CloudGuard Network Security is perceived as cost-effective compared to using the built-in tools provided by the cloud. Specifically, the VPN functionality is more economical in CloudGuard Network Security, where users can create multiple VPNs without additional charges for each VPN, paying only for the bandwidth. This is contrasted with cloud providers that may charge for each VPN on a per-minute basis, including Ingress and Egress costs.
What other advice do I have?
Unified Security Management provides a consistent interface and knowledge base, allowing those who were trained in Check Point for on-premise use to apply that same understanding across various cloud environments such as Google, AWS, Alibaba, Oracle, and more.
I rate the product an eight out of ten. There is always work to be done. However, some customers may find other technologies more understandable, and there could be a perceived difficulty in the human-computer interaction with Check Point. This might create challenges in comparison to competitors, as customers may find competitors' solutions easier to use.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Service Delivery Lead - IT Security at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Fair price, good support, and effective for security and operational efficiency
Pros and Cons
- "Security effectiveness is the most valuable feature. Operational efficiency, reporting, and support are also good."
- "The SD-WAN could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for network protection. We're using its latest version.
How has it helped my organization?
We're benefiting from the solution. We're protecting all of our assets with it. It's a very good security solution. We don't face any big challenges or problems.
What is most valuable?
Security effectiveness is the most valuable feature. Operational efficiency, reporting, and support are also good.
What needs improvement?
The SD-WAN could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than ten years.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is very good. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have been using the same solution from the beginning.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy. It took two to four hours.
We have a hybrid cloud deployment. We have Azure and AWS.
What about the implementation team?
We used an integrator. Our experience with them wasn't great.
What was our ROI?
We've seen an ROI with this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's not very expensive. It isn't very cheap either. Its price is okay. It depends on how much money you have. It might be expensive for some companies.
Its licensing is on a yearly basis.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated solutions from Forcepoint, Cisco, and Fortinet. We went for it because of its security effectiveness and operational efficiency.
What other advice do I have?
It's the best solution to use. You can trust it. We don't have any issues with it. It works fine.
Overall, I'd rate it a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Systems Engineer at Pamafe Informatica LDA
Protects virtual data centers and offers savings on money
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature for us is the ability to run the gateways as virtual machines in our virtual data center. The tool protects the virtual data centers."
- "The solution's integration with cloud providers has seen significant development in the past months, but there is room for improvement for better integration."
What is our primary use case?
We use the security gateways to protect the virtual data centers.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature for us is the ability to run the gateways as virtual machines in our virtual data center. The tool protects the virtual data centers.
What needs improvement?
The solution's integration with cloud providers has seen significant development in the past months, but there is room for improvement for better integration.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling up is straightforward, involving the purchase of additional licenses and allocating virtual CPUs to the client.
How are customer service and support?
CloudGuard Network Security's support is good. I would like the support to be faster. However, it is not possible all the time.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The tool's deployment is straightforward.
What was our ROI?
My customers have experienced ROI with the tool's use. If there's a security issue, it can lead to downtime or loss of data, which means losing money. So, the main focus is on the financial aspect. Security is also one of the benefits of using the product.
What other advice do I have?
We have both cloud and on-premises deployment models. The solution offers protection and full visibility of traffic on cloud solutions. It is rock solid and comes with proven technology. We can benefit from its detection rates and security. I rate the overall product a ten out of ten. It is a straightforward solution that uses existing technology. We don't have to learn new technology. We can use what we know and deploy it on to the cloud.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Infrastructure Security Consultant at ANECT
Offers a user-friendly and efficient interface
Pros and Cons
- "The central management feature is a big plus, allowing us to manage both local and cloud gateways from one platform."
- "There is room for improvement in addressing bugs and support issues."
What is our primary use case?
I can easily secure communication between our Azure Stack Hub and local Azure environments using CloudGuard gateways. This ensures that when I deploy applications in Azure, I can securely access databases and other resources in my local environment through a VPN channel. It is a straightforward way to keep everything protected as I work between the cloud and on-premises infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
The central management feature is a big plus, allowing us to manage both local and cloud gateways from one platform. Another advantage is the unified logging system, which makes it easy to track all communications. Index logs enable us to see all of the logs with all of the features in one place. Unlike other solutions like Palo Alto's Panorama, where checking logs can be cumbersome, CloudGuard's interface is user-friendly and efficient. I have to manually click on every log, one at a time. This helps streamline our deployment process, as I focus on the initial setup before handing it off to other departments for ongoing management.
CloudGuard's ease of policy creation and centralized logging are definite strengths.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in addressing bugs and support issues. Communication with support, particularly with certain teams, can sometimes be challenging and slow, impacting problem resolution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with CloudGuard Cloud Network Security for almost eight years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We use CloudGuard to manage 15,000 people. We have ten applications and 14 subscriptions.
How are customer service and support?
The Israel tech support is better than other regions because they respond quickly and help us resolve our issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Check Point's management interface is easier to use compared to products like Palo Alto's Panorama and FortiManager.
Palo Alto and FortiManager are more complicated than CloudGuard.
When it comes to identifying security threats, CloudGuard is on par with other solutions. While Palo Alto doesn't have zero-day protection, it ultimately depends on how customers configure their security rules.
How was the initial setup?
I'm quite pleased with CloudGuard because it is incredibly easy to deploy. Whether I'm using the marketplace or SmartConsole, setting up the gateway takes just a few seconds or minutes, and connecting to local or cloud management is seamless.
Deploying Check Point CloudGuard has been generally straightforward, but we have encountered challenges with Azure Stack Hub due to feature discrepancies with public Azure. The absence of a console in Azure Stack Hub and outdated versions can pose issues. However, if project preparation and resource allocation are done correctly, deployments usually go smoothly. Typically, we purchase between two to six cores for our deployments.
If we prepare the right CPUs it's okay.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is okay. I know the cost for the competitors and CloudGuard pricing is fine. It is cheaper than other firewalls.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate CloudGuard Cloud Network Security as a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Firewalls Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Cloud and Data Center Security WAN Edge Unified Threat Management (UTM)Popular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Netgate pfSense
Cisco Secure Firewall
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
Check Point NGFW
WatchGuard Firebox
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- We're trying to choose between Fortinet or Checkpoint UTM firewalls. Can you help?
- Is Check Point's software compatible with other products?
- What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
- When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cyberoam or Fortinet?
- Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?
- If you could go back, would you change your decision to buy that firewall and why?