We use Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (formerly DCNM) to manage all the Nexus switches at the airport. We have around 40 of them. We use the solution to check the health and performances of the boxes, the environments (CPU/memory), the VPC and port channel links, the fabric module, power, the supervisor engine, line card modules, and the transceivers. It manages and monitors all the VDCs using SNMP and Syslog. Patch updates and upgrades of the NXOS are implemented using DCNM. We raise RMA directly from it anytime we have to replace a faulty module or switch. I think it is still the best data center management solution out there.
Network Team Lead at Atlas Security
Easy to deploy, stable, scalable and best data center manager for your infra.
Pros and Cons
- "VCNM provides a unique capability of managing the admin VDCs of Nexus boxes."
- "The reporting is not very intuitive and has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Easy patch updates and upgrades, data center live monitoring, log management, configuration management, raising TAC cases and many more are areas where DCNM has improved my company.
What is most valuable?
Cisco DCNM provides a unique capability of managing the admin VDCs of Nexus boxes. This is an extremely important feature that is not available with Cisco Super Prime or any other monitoring device. DCNM also supplies a clear graphical view of the connectivity across all VDCs. Integrating with DCMN is an incredible experience. The NDI integration provides an unparalleled level of insight into the data center, allowing for comprehensive analysis and visualization of the entire environment. The power of this integration has truly blown my mind!
What needs improvement?
The reporting is not very intuitive and has room for improvement. I opened a case with Cisco regarding the DCNM report, however, they were unable to help me. The report comes in the form of a programmable report, which requires high-level knowledge of Python and JSON script. As I was in a meeting and had to present the report, I had to settle for generating an Excel sheet to showcase the data. Unfortunately, this was not well-received as they expected a more detailed report.
In order to identify any issues in the data center, we must thoroughly examine a variety of components such as links, errors, SSPs, supervisor engines, power supply, and more. Forty of each element need to be examined.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for almost 7 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I was somewhat let down by my last two experiences with Cisco tech support for some issues. The previous team had been more knowledgeable and provided better service. The last case I opened was related to reporting and was particularly unimpressive. Cisco advised me to find someone who is proficient in programming to create a report for me. This is another expense for the company. I asked if there was a template I could use to develop my project, but Cisco said no. I had an issue with one of the boxes beforehand, where it would ask for sync when there was no configuration change after a few minutes. The box icon usually turns green when it's working, but it would turn red. The issue took almost two months to fix, and I had to do it myself. The lady never contacted me until two months later when she sent a message asking if we could continue this. I had already fixed the issue, so I was disappointed.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No
How was the initial setup?
Compared to previous versions of the solution the initial setup is easy. We initially used TenDot and had issues during the initial deployment. We then upgraded to 10.0.x, 10.4.x, 11.1(0), and finally 11.5(4), which was much simpler. Although we have not upgraded to 12.x yet, the deployment process of the latest versions didn't take as long as the initial deployment of 10.x DCNM. We experienced some issues with bugs and links showing down when they were online on 10.x DCNM. The problems have already been resolved in the latest releases 11.x and 12.x.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
When we purchase Nexus boxes, the "DCNM for LAN Advanced License and MDS" licenses were purchased alongside with them; this allows the DCNM server to manage the Nexus boxes.
We can download Cisco DCNM from the Cisco website and install it on a virtual environment such as VMware or Hyper-V, a Windows system, or in the cloud. We don't need to pay for the DCNM license because the nexus switches required DCNM licenses to manage them. To activate the DCNM server license itself, we just needed to contact Cisco and they will generate the license for us.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution a nine out of ten.
We have two clients using the solution. One has a small data center and the other is running a large data center. Both clients are using Cisco DCNM Classic LAN - HA to manage the data centers.
We integrated the NAC server (Cisco ISE) with this unit, so all users and their respective privileges are managed remotely instead of locally. We have a large number of users with varying privileges, and they can all access the unit based on the privileges they have been granted on the NAC server.
The best Configuration Management an organization can use to manage Nexus boxes such as N2K, N3K, N5K, and N7K, is Cisco DCNM. The solution will also provide a full description of what is happening within the data center.
We have Cisco Prime and NNMi, but these services cannot fully monitor or manage all the NX-OS boxes. Therefore, Cisco DCNM is the best choice for managing the VDCs. Cisco DCNM has three interfaces, one to connect to the out-of-bound boxes (Enhanced Fabric Management), an Enhanced-Fabric-Inband interface for inbound traffic, and a third interface for DCNM-management traffic. Because most of the servers have only one interface (inbound), they are not able to manage the entire box and VDCs. With Cisco DCNM's multiple interfaces, it is able to manage both the inbound and outbound traffic on the box. This makes Cisco DCNM the perfect solution to manage data center infra.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Last updated: Aug 5, 2024
Flag as inappropriateNetwork Operations Specialist at Trends and Technologies, Inc
Provides very good documentation with easy deployment and troubleshooting capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "It has a very nice dashboard so you can see what's currently happening in the network and the performance of the back story."
- "It's very costly."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution in data center to manage Nexus features and ECS servers.
How has it helped my organization?
Cisco provides very good documentation. It is easy to deploy and troubleshoot, and they have good backup support in case of any issues. With regard to maintenance or hardware, I haven't had any significant issues working with Cisco products.
What is most valuable?
It has a very nice dashboard so you can see what's currently happening in the network and the performance of the back story.
What needs improvement?
It's very costly. Most of our customers are actually looking for other cost-effective solutions. Even if it has very good performance, other competitors can offer the same at a lower cost.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) as an implementor for five years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is 95% scalable. You need support for cosmetic bugs, security issues, and upgrades.
It is suitable for service provider customers.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use Arista For SDN controllers.
How was the initial setup?
We could set it up in less than a week.
Two guys are enough to install and configure the product. You need to have the basic package. You don't need any advanced services.
What was our ROI?
Most of our customers who use Cisco have had the box running for ten plus years, there is ROI.
What other advice do I have?
Cisco has AI switches already for AI use cases.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementor
Last updated: Aug 27, 2024
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Technical Manager at Ledorbis Solutions
Offers great value for the money and is vendor-independent
Pros and Cons
- "The interface of this solution is easy to use overall."
- "If the customer thinks about using additional solutions, Cisco should make sure they are not left out."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution to build private clouds in government data centers. Government institutions mainly use their own data centers. We come in when they want an update or something in addition to their data centers. We work on any addition or update requirements in these data centers.
We are system integrators who also take part in purchase and selling. We architect solutions and implement them for all activities as part of a business.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is that it is vendor-independent. We have an open-solution approach. However, the actual devices have to be from an OEM but the management part, if proposed on open platforms, the solution becomes independent of OEMs.
What needs improvement?
For network management, your access is locked to Cisco. Open solutions let us integrate with other solutions. Cisco should have better integration to use additional tools. If the customer thinks about using additional solutions, which are alternatives, Cisco should make sure they are not left out.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for more than ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is very scalable. We work with their architects to figure out the solution. Scalability is a factor we take into consideration when we design a data center.
This solution can be used by big companies as well as SMBs.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good. I would rate the technical support a ten out of ten. For maintenance and support, Cisco provides options like next day, business day, or within around four hours. Multiple options are available, so depending on the use case, everyone can choose the ideal level of support.
How was the initial setup?
When a solution has more depth, the setup is more complex. Cisco has extensive training and documentation, so we don't have a hard time with the setup.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would say that the pricing offers great value for the money. The solution is expensive, but it gets compensated by the use cases.
The licensing cost is also on the higher side, but customers show confidence in our implementation of this solution. Getting trained people on this solution to do the job is easier for us. We have found that Cisco is a good company to work with.
The licensing model is not complex. Some scenarios can be complex, but the complexity is justified.
The cost structure is very transparent regarding maintenance and support.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
For some use cases, we worked with Juniper. Juniper is equally strong.
In comparison, the certification process is very extensive for Cisco. Most professionals are trained and familiar with Cisco. Of every ten professionals, all will be trained in Cisco, whereas only two will be familiar with Juniper.
What other advice do I have?
Whichever solution needs to be implemented, we can always work with Cisco Solutions. They have the right fit for everything, Cisco helps us select the right product. We work out a solution and vet it by Cisco; that's how we work. I would overall rate the solution an eight out of ten.
The interface of this solution is easy to use overall and is intuitive enough.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
A multisite network orchestration and policy management solution with useful Python scripting feature
Pros and Cons
- "I like running the scripts. With the help of a Python script, we deployed within the configuration and built up the code."
- "One of the biggest challenges is that we aren't always able to push the configuration onto the target device. Whenever this happens, we have to do a factory reset, put on the script, and then reconfigure it again. In the next release, I would like to have a troubleshooting feature."
What is our primary use case?
We recently deployed our supply value for architecture and connected it to DCNM.
What is most valuable?
I like running the scripts. With the help of a Python script, we deployed within the configuration and built up the code.
What needs improvement?
One of the biggest challenges is that we aren't always able to push the configuration onto the target device. Whenever this happens, we have to do a factory reset, put on the script, and then reconfigure it again. In the next release, I would like to have a troubleshooting feature.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Data Center Network Manager for about two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Cisco Data Center Network Manager is not a stable product. We had some database issues, and we had to restart it manually. We also had some false alarms and had to investigate.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give stability a seven.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Cisco Data Center Network Manager is scalable. We have two IT engineers using it right now.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give scalability an eight.
How are customer service and support?
I think we are premium partners, so technical support was mostly good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have Cisco ECI. We are focusing on high-end customers, so we are using DCNM. We also have Cisco AFI.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented this solution. We have three people, including a network architect, to deploy and manage this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would tell potential users a couple of things. Firstly, if you're trying to execute any network script, ensure it's properly written. Otherwise, it's going to create a huge impact. Secondly, before performing any upgrade to the latest version, pay the tag ticket to ensure that the firmware is OK and cannot cause any outage in your environment.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco Data Center Network Manager an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Good network integration, but the visibility of applications could be better
Pros and Cons
- "You can integrate all the networks into the software."
- "The visibility of applications is not great."
What is most valuable?
The HDA is part of the micro-segmentation of the network, and it can be integrated with security departments like the F5 Checkpoint Firewall Tool. You can integrate all the networks into the software and file network data center. We are looking for the load balancing and application service of Cloudflare.
What needs improvement?
The visibility of applications is not great, which is why we study upscalability. We want to understand the software-defined network and access, the edge, and how to connect. The setup is complex and could be improved. Regarding additional features, the integration with the APM would be good.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for 14 years, and it is implemented on-premises, Google Cloud, Amazon, or Azure.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable in terms of the network and software. You can do many things in terms of integration with the terraform.
How are customer service and support?
I rate the technical support an eight out of ten. We have a great relationship with them and talk directly with the business unit.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The setup process was complex and not simple. It's not a plug-and-play solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being a good price.
What other advice do I have?
I rate this solution a six out of ten. It can be compared to VMWare but more as a complimentary solution than a competitor.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
IT Solution Consultant at PCS
A great monitoring system and informative user interface are great features
Pros and Cons
- "Monitoring system provides a clear indication of what's going on in the network."
- "It's a relatively expensive product for some clients."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is for monitoring and protecting companies from malware attacks as well as providing secure VPN. I'm an IT solution consultant.
What is most valuable?
The monitoring system in this product is valuable. It provides a clear indication of what's going on in the network and the server processing, power, etc. User interface is also very good, very informative.
What needs improvement?
It's a relatively expensive product for some clients so perhaps improvement could be made in that area. In terms of product improvement, I don't have any recommendations. I'm happy with the product as is.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been providing service on this solution and using it for over 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product, I don't intend to replace it in the near future.
How are customer service and technical support?
I've used the technical support many times in the past. They are very helpful.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've used HP in the past, but it's for enterprise companies so not comparable to Network Manager.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward - I use the help of an integrator for this.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I believe cost for the product is below 5,000K.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Network Manager for small and medium scale companies. When it comes to larger scale companies, you would need to look at HP.
I would rate this product a nine out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
CSD Manager at BTC
Network monitoring is straightforward and the program is really easy to use
Pros and Cons
- "I like that is easy to work on and straightforward."
- "The configuration is too complicated and you have to create templates and use a lot of menus."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of this solution is for system network monitoring. We also use it for the implementation of Cisco projects and for gateway documents. We recently did a big implementation, and we did most of the features and configuration through Cisco Data Center Network Manager. So we are basically using this product to implement another one.
What is most valuable?
I like that is easy to work on and straightforward.
What needs improvement?
The configuration is too complicated and you have to create templates and use a lot of menus. They need to make it simpler.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for two years now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We've tried the maximum scalability and it is really scalable. We've had no problems.
How are customer service and technical support?
Whenever we have any cases we are dire to commit to, we use Cisco's technical support. They are very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We normally use Cisco products, like Cisco Management. I have a variance with SolarWinds and EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol). But we try to choose the same product from the same window from Cisco, and now we are trying to provide the same network for the management.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was really straightforward.
What other advice do I have?
This solution is the easiest and most straightforward. We would recommend it for sure. I would like to see more product devices and have the full software to the Data Center Management product to purchase. This is because the Data Center Network Manager doesn't support every product of Cisco. On a scale from one to 10, I would rate Cisco Data Center Network Manager an eight because there is room for improvement.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Sr.Solution :AI:rchitect at Wipro Limited
Stable solution that gives good ROI
Pros and Cons
- "Data Center Network Manager is absolutely stable."
- "Data Center Network Manager is a little complex because it includes a lot of hardware to be installed."
What needs improvement?
Data Center Network Manager is a little complex because it includes a lot of hardware to be installed, so making this simpler would be an improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Data Center Network Manager is absolutely stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Data Center Network Manager is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Cisco's technical support is excellent.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward so long as you have experience in networking.
What was our ROI?
We've had a good ROI from Data Center Network Manager. There's also a facility on Cisco's website to calculate the ROI from adopting this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
On average, Data Center Network Manager's pricing isn't too costly unless you choose a premier license.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise those thinking of implementing Data Center Network Manager to get some expert supervision during the planning stage. I would give Data Center Network Manager a rating of nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Network Monitoring SoftwarePopular Comparisons
PRTG Network Monitor
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
Arista Data ANalyZer
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the overall differences between Cisco Prime and Cisco DNAC?
- When evaluating Network Performance Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
- What Questions Should I Ask Before Buying a Network Monitoring Tool?
- UIM OnPrem - SaaS
- Anyone switching from SolarWinds NPM? What is a good alternative and why?
- What is the best tool for SQL monitoring in a large enterprise?
- What tool do you recommend using for VoIP monitoring for a mid-sized enterprise?
- Should we choose Nagios or PRTG?
- Which is the best network monitoring tool: Zabbix or Solarwinds? Pros and Cons?