Hello community,
I work for a large comms services company. I am currently researching network monitoring tools.
What are the overall differences between Cisco Prime and Cisco DNAC? Cloud base/delivered, premise-based, etc?
Thank you for your help.
Two major differences:
1. The actual models that they manage, the p-dart Cisco migration report will tell you where you stand on this issue. Not all CPI models are supported on DNA.
2. Installation and maintenance automation of connected devices. A modern must-have for device deployment and maintenance.
Having said these two points, DNA is and will be the integration point for a whole suite of products like CPO which will become a DNA module and tighter integration with ICE. Furthermore, the new automation feature is really a prequel to the more interesting self-diagnosis and self-correction of device operations. Hope this answers your question, but install the PDART migration report to really understand the ROI of DNA.
We use both Cisco DNAC and Cisco Prime (PI). Actually, you can easily use the migration tool on Cisco PI 3.10 to migrate your data and integrate it with DNAC. DNAC is more dynamic and robust than PI supporting intent-based networking, analytics and assurance, and many automated operations.
Best suited for enterprise environments with many Cisco platforms and multiple managed devices where automated operations are highly required.
If we didn't have PI before, we would have just settled for DNAC because DNAC can do a lot more and better.