Aiven Platform vs Software AG Apama comparison

"What I like best about the tool is that the process for the services is faster compared to other methods. It's easier to use because Aiven for Apache Kafka handles the maintenance, so we have less to manage. We only use Kafka to manage its connectivity."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability that it provides its users to handle different kinds of rules."

"One challenge we face is when we want to update the version, for example, from 3.6 to 3.7. It will spawn new nodes, and then there's rebalancing and syncing from other brokers. There's high CPU usage during this process, so the solution can't be used for a while, causing some downtime in our services. To tackle this challenge, we schedule maintenance updates during low-traffic periods when there's less risk and fewer users use the services."

"The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product."

"A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama."