Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azul Zing vs TmaxSoft ProFrame [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azul Zing
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (16th)
TmaxSoft ProFrame [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user332814 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 1, 2015
We no longer need to concern ourselves with tuning the garbage collector or coding around it, but the profiling tools lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation.
The most important Zing feature for LMAX Exchange is the C4 garbage collector. C4 effectively does continuous garbage collection and for LMAXExchange that means less latency jitter. Latency is a big deal for us and while low latency is important, predictable latency is also a requirement for our…
Use TmaxSoft ProFrame [EOL]?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
34%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProFrame
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more.  Visit azul.com for more.
LG, Kyongnam Bank Co. Ltd.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.