Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cadence Incisive Palladium vs Mentor Graphics PADS comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Cadence Incisive Palladium
Ranking in Electronic Design Automation
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mentor Graphics PADS
Ranking in Electronic Design Automation
3rd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Electronic Design Automation category, the mindshare of Cadence Incisive Palladium is 11.5%, down from 17.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mentor Graphics PADS is 16.5%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Electronic Design Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cadence Incisive Palladium?
Share your opinion
it_user5520 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 29, 2013
A sophisticated PCB program providing high quality results for an affordable price.
This is the best printed circuit board design software focusing on layout and design. Very user friendly program. Definitely will get your moneys worth. Stable, cost effective, yet sophisticated and powerful. There are lots of upgrades and add ons available to meet all users needs. This…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Electronic Design Automation solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
36%
University
20%
Educational Organization
15%
Comms Service Provider
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Palladium
PADS
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NetSpeed, Fujitsu, Sharp
Aethercomm Inc., Andrew Ferencz Consulting, Anritsu, Cool Earth Solar Inc., Dynapar, Ellett Valley Group, Pelagic Pressure Systems Inc.