Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Caucho Resin vs IBM WebSphere Application Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Caucho Resin
Ranking in Application Server
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM WebSphere Application S...
Ranking in Application Server
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Caucho Resin is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 11.9%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Use Caucho Resin?
Share your opinion
Saleem Shar - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 3, 2023
Compatible, stable, and scalable
We deploy the solution both on-premise and Azure, AWS, and IBM cloud. We use a solution for our e-commerce application. We have an application deployed on AWS Cloud, for a client, which has a large B2B customer base in Australia. Therefore, we use WebSphere Application Server for the e-commerce…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We pay around $200,000 annually."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"My company is on a perpetual or permanent license agreement with IBM WebSphere Application Server. There's also a pay-per-use option, but customers rarely choose that option. Most of the customers are on the perpetual license deal that's all-inclusive. As the license cost is quite expensive, I'm rating it two out of five."
"When you purchase Maximo, you get WebSphere for free."
"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."
"It costs more than some of the others, but, you get what you pay for."
"It's expensive."
"The licensing cost is 1,000 of euros for a 30-year table."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Application Server?
Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere Application Server edition.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?
The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?
I think in some moments, the security was a little bit more complex to configure when it was delegated to other systems, making it an area where improvements are required.
 

Also Known As

Resin
WebSphere Application Server
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RealMetrics, SugarCRM, Salesforce.com, GoHealth Insurance, PowerSteering, Wazap!, Vision Service Plan, MocoSpace, Vantage
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.